However, few of us are likely to consciously apply matrix mathematics in our day to day lives.
ok you got to the conclusion at the end of the article, build on it and help!!
However, few of us are likely to consciously apply matrix mathematics in our day to day lives.
ok you got to the conclusion at the end of the article, build on it and help!!
If the video game has curved reflecting surfaces, such as a shiny silver goblet, the linear transformation matrix would be more complicated, to stretch or shrink the reflection.
Here's the sweet stuff. Now let's get to how we recognize this in even more places; build from the foundation.
Matrix mathematics simplifies linear algebra, at least in providing a more compact way to deal with groups of equations in linear algebra
This is how it relates directly to my class
Matrix arithmetic helps us calculate the electrical properties of a circuit, with voltage, amperage, resistance, etc.
this means we get phones an stuff. This only means something to a science nerd, not someone considering dropping out of high school
computer graphics, then touch on science
This is fine, but not likely to engage youth that I want to talk about. Don't we need to start with "fun" stuff to get people invested first?
Speeches using paradigms are not less persuasive, butthose with enthymemes excite more favorable audience reaction
really vital. is there any way to mix, or have a healthy medium to appeal to all audience members who want some of each?
3. In legislation, it is useful to an investigator notonly to know what constitution is advantageous on the basis of pasthistory but also to know the constitutions in effect in other states
comparison
Insofar as someone tries tomake dialectic or rhetoric not just mental faculties but sciences, heunwittingly obscures their nature by the change
making it too specific narrows the crowd
. As to whatever necessarily exists or will exist or is impossible tobe or to have come about, on these matters there will be no delibera-tion
always do possibilities, not absolutes
Further, since all speakers, praising and blam-ing and urging and dissuading and prosecuting and defending, notonly try to show what has been mentioned but that the good or the evilor the honorable or the shameful or the just or the unjust is great orsmall, either speaking of things in themselves or in comparison toeach other, it is clear that it would be necessary also to have prop-ositions about the great and the small and the greater and the lesser,both generally and specifically; for example, [about] what is the greateror lesser good or injustice or justice, and similarly about other qual-ities.87
hoe speakers provide beneficial outcomes to all actors in the debate, large and small
propositions
pragmatism is vital? do you always need one or can you also talk about how there is a lack of it in the status quo?
Similarly, deliber-ative speakers often advance other facts, but they would never admitthat they are advising things that are not advantageous [to the audi-ence
always tell the audience what you say is better for them, not you
In the lawcourts there is either accusation [katBgoria] or defense [apologia]; forit is necessary for the disputants to offer one or the other of these
is this entire section funnelling everything down into two options? isnt that one of the fallacies heinrichs talks about?
for only it, if true, is irrefutable
truth=truth?
Thus,it is necessary for an enthymeme and a paradigm to be concerned withthings that are for the most part capable of being other than they are
look out for trickery? is this a tip for the audience or society in general?
In the case of persuasion through proving or seeming toprove something, just as in dialectic there is on the one hand induction[epagDgB] and on the other the syllogism and the apparent syllogism
is this what he means by unethical? trying to trick the audience into a proof?
character is almost, so to speak,the most authoritative form of persuasion
therefore as a speaker I should strive to show character
Butrhetoric seems to be able to observe the persuasive about “the given,”so to speak. That, too, is why we say it does not include technicalknowledge of any particular, defined genus [of subjects]
prior knowledge is not the most vital thing, but rather principles
the latter is more characteristic of humans than is use of thebody.
intelligence trumps physical nature within societies
thus an ability to aim at commonly held opinions [endoxa]22isa characteristic of one who also has a similar ability in regard to thetruth
good power quote. they who can understand the assumptions of the audience is therefore better understanding of the truth
while they explain nothing about artistic proofs
i feel like introductions have other merits like context.
that is the same as if someone made a straight-edge ruler crookedbefore using it.
doesnt seem like a great justification, even though I agree
This is true of Socrates’ argument,found in Appendix I.B, that since a rhetorician “knows” justice hemust necessarily always be just, and his analogy between rhetoric andcookery as sham arts of flattery
Logical fallacy that aristotle even describes. morality of speaking is very interesting
flattery
This was talked about in the play Medea. Orators in this time often just praised athens for most of their dialogue and were revered for it.