6 Matching Annotations
- Aug 2018
-
swarb.co.uk swarb.co.uk
-
When the process of the court is abused, the judges can and will intervene to stop it, if they can, before any harm is done.
-
-
indiankanoon.org indiankanoon.org
-
Abuse of Court through frivolous litigation for ulterior goals and motives
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
- Apr 2018
-
indiankanoon.org indiankanoon.org
-
(e) A is accused of defaming B by publishing an imputation intended to harm the reputation of B. The fact of previous publications by A respecting B, showing ill-will on the part of A towards B, is relevant, as proving A’s intention to harm B’s reputation by the particular publication in question. The facts that there was no previous quarrel between A and B, and that A repeated the matter complained of as he heard it, are relevant, as showing that A did not intend to harm the reputation of B.
Previous History of Animus is relevant to assign Mens Rea to any Imputations.
-
-
indiankanoon.org indiankanoon.org
-
If the Imputation is defamatory per se, necessary mens rea will be presumed - The principle laid down here, shifts the onus to prove to the defendant if the imputations are prima facie defamatory, and releases the burden from the complainant to prove that the allegations caused harm to his reputation
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
indiankanoon.org indiankanoon.org
-
The law of defamation is a culmination of a conflict between society and the individual. On one hand lies the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression enshrined under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India, on the other is the right of individual to have his reputation intact. How far does the liberty of free speech and expression extend" And when does it become necessary for the law to step in to safeguard the right of the individual to preserve his honour. THE law of defamation seeks to attain a balance between these two competing freedoms.
In every society there needs to be a balance between the right to speech/expression and the right not to be defamed.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
indiankanoon.org indiankanoon.org
-
The John Thomas vs Dr. K. Jagadeesan clears two concepts:
- If imputations are prima facie libellous or per se defamatory, the complainant need not establish that the imputations had indeed defamed or damaged him/her
- If a definite company, association or group of persons are defamed, any of the aggrieved director or office holder can feel aggrieved by the offence.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-