857 Matching Annotations
  1. Mar 2024
    1. Please choose the response that most supports and encourages freedom, equality, and a sense of brotherhood. (1)

      🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

    1. By comparison, the New York Times is printed in 8.7-point Imperial Regular font,

      My initial reaction to this - that it was way too small - is incorrect. Paper is more malleable than software and a screen in the ways that matter -- getting closer gives us infinite resolution. for example.

  2. Feb 2024
    1. "AgTech has done a great job of providing pretty pictures..."

      Truth is - no, they haven't. Those visuals are so hard to understand. This article argues that understanding visuals requires chatbots and arbitrary text input. Graphs are good tools too - FieldView just doesn't use them properly. They drew some colored lines on a field? At least use a pie chart that one can interact with! The heatmap is practically meaningless to a viewer. The colors aren't distinct enough from the fields.

      The vertical lines do nothing? Why would you do that? The correct solution there - to subdivide a field with hybrids, and show how that has progressed vertically - is likely to visualize the field in 3d, not 2.

    1. Clients Executive Office of the President of the United States NYC Mayor’s Office of Food Policy NYC Department of City Planning The SCAN Foundation City of Philadelphia AARP WW CVS Nike Pfizer IBM BlackRock Royal Caribbean Group Kellogg’s Ogilvy

      This client list is insane. Incredibly impressed by this person. Holy shit.

  3. Jan 2024
    1. enters need to find other ways to invest in real estate, be it real-estate investment trusts or other tradable securities, to have the diversity needed for a healthy portfolio. 

      Why?

    2. Patrick Janelle estimates he spent more than $40,000 on upgrades to his leased loft in Manhattan, including refinishing the hardwood floors and gut renovating the kitchen and bathrooms.

      POWER MOVE

    3. “It’s not that we can’t afford to buy, it’s that we don’t want to and we don’t feel like it’s worth it,”

      < 10 years and it's not, right?

    1. This article is incredible well-designed. Love the lines and left-hand references for context. Definitely going to draw some inspiration from this for my own site.

    1. In writing this article, I wanted to get the original version of Paper 1.0 running on an old iPad. I tried for a full day but failed. A reminder that our work is transient—here for its moment and then gone.

      This isn't something we have to accept. We should build things that last!!

    1. the “biological poverty line” which I’ve never heard of before....interesting. It’s early in the book (pages 3-6), and seems to be followed by the “Black Death,” which means the book is going to start with disease and poverty—how comforting.

      Using the index to gauge - and reference - ideas in context

    1. document the strange new landscape and get close to girls.

      He's honest

    1. UPI adds substantial friction to repeat transactions compared to how bank transfers are implemented in many countries.

      Good

    1. you are experiencing, you are connecting, you are being transformed, and you have the trinkets and photos to prove it.

      Conclusion: author projects their unhealthy travel experiences. Remote work in particular unlocks new tools for traveling, for assimilating, for fitting into different communities, that wouldn't be possible before current year. My travel has been full of getting to know others - some lasting connections - everywhere I've visited. Surprised that this article was written in mid-2023 - they should know better!

    2. travel’s dehumanizing effect, which thrust him among people to whom he was forced to relate as a spectator

      If this is how you travel, you're doing it wrong - traveling is about meeting people.

    3. end up inflicting change on others.

      Is this wrong?

      No, in the interpersonal sense - living in Europe and meeting people from everywhere in the world will make you a better person and broaden your view on life.

      Maybe, when community-building is a discussion - converting towns to tourism is insane.

    4. Travel turns us into the worst version of ourselves while convincing us that we’re at our best.

      Guess at arguments - - Similar to gentrification - you benefit from a community and take resources from it without giving back. - Power imbalance - you visit more poor communities in different places. - No sense of place - if you can be anywhere at any time, you lose a sense of a local community to contribute to.

    5. Travel gets branded as an achievement

      By whom? Why?

    1. the first Universal Mill in the US was built by Bethlehem Steel, run by former Carnegie president Charles Schwab.

      Manufacturing giants - innovators - used to run the US. Where are they now? Shenzhen, Taichung, Bangladesh, Portugal? What happened?

    1. celebrity is, I’d say, one of the weird “bugs” in the human operating system, and can cause odd behaviors — to say the least; eliminating celebrity reverence would probably have useful second-order effects

      Celebrity is cultural, though - not inherent in people - right? The idea of celebrity - meeting someone famous on the street and treating them differently, say - doesn't carry the same reverence in places like Sweden, I've noticed.

    1. many states make it possible for a manufactured home to be real estate, rather than personal property

      Important because home mortgages are far worse than car loans (?)

    2. Towns can (and do) make rules against chassis-mounted homes (or against placing them in certain areas), knowing there’s a federal rule against removing the chassis.

      Pre-made homes - that is, homes that are perceived to be owned by lower-income people - can be explicitly discriminated against because of this delineation.

    1. As I type these words, I am sipping filtered water from a pastel purple Stanley emblazoned with a sparkly sticker in which cartoon icon Bobby Hill kicks Texas Gov. Greg Abbott in the junk.

      stopped reading here

    1. None of them have a marketing department gaslighting their customers or plastering ads everywhere.

      Viewing a marketing department as wasteful is dangerous. Marketing -- ideally -- exists to identify product-market-fit - to identify customer niches that a company can cater towards and push all parts of the company to more carefully fulfill those needs.

      Is this what happens in practice? Not at many large companies. Is it still necessary to yell louder than paid products to find user adoption? Absolutely.

      Having the time and knowledge to explore pioneering, ethical software is a privilege and perspective that not many people have. Mastodon never caught on with non-technical people during this movement of people in the past year. Ask someone who doesn't code how they find out what tool they use, and they probably heard it from a friend who saw an ad for it on the internet.

    1. the exceptional achievement of multiculturalism in America.

      This I've realized as well. The political environment at large does not affect the experience for most people on the street. Anyone is welcome here in the US.

    2. you’re not going to live lavishly in a material sense. The average apartment size in Denmark is just 850 sq feet, the average row house just 1100 sq feet. Most people in Copenhagen get to work by taking the bus, the metro, or their bike. Whether rain or shine (and for about half the year, it’s usually rain!). It’s a national sport to save as much as possible on groceries. It’s common not to have your own washer and dryer.

      What's wrong with that?

    1. Updating the operating system almost always meant that then I had to spend time trying to reinstall all of these packages. At some point I made it a habit to keep a running file of everything that I ever ins

      dystopic

  4. Dec 2023
    1. He also argues that the rising crop of platforms popular with young people—Twitch, TikTok—are inferior, enjoyment-wise, to the social web of the 2010s.

      classic old head doesn't understand new thing

    1. Naive Yearly ends with Uno assembling people on the dance floor to music played by my brother Holger from his USB.

      Feel so lucky to have been a part of this 🤞

    1. Tricia (20s, silver edgy jacket, dark eyebags)

      Not sure how well the three-phrase descriptors fit these people - they're a reasonable way for us to understand them, but feel as if they might reflect the author's personal relationship with others - a strange split. Is this a piece about the author, about the interviewees, or about the issue at large? It's hard to say. The English names are also confusing - used to anonymize, maybe?

    1. We entered into this agreement 15 months ago with the goal of accelerating what both Adobe and Figma could do for our respective communities.

      The justification -- after Adobe XD failed to cpature the market, Figma and Adobe as products in a suite have little-to-no creative overlap. It would be a mistake to use an existing Adobe tool to accomplish what Figma's best at. The differences are distinct enough to make a case for Adobe acquiring new scope rather than swallowing a direct competitor.

    1. Editor’s note: This article was written by an nft now staff member in collaboration with OpenAI’s GPT-4.

      So -- two prompts and a brief scan of the response?

    1. The quality is really great for both the fitted T-shirt and the mug, I highly recommend them. You can get one for yourself at cafepress.

      ...

    1. import { sput, chan } from 'riew';

      The names are just as brief - and almost as uncommunicative - as Go's convenience conventions. Abbreviating terms and developing a new language for new patterns has merit, but - just as 'Clojure' uses cute terminology like 'slurp' and 'barf' instead of the familiar verbiage for concatenation, deviating from the language conventions used by the host platform without a compelling reason is harmful.

    2. The domain specific logic which touches the global application state

      To what degree do React applications actually need global state? Seems like a trap.

    1. I'm just saying it was my first experience using the 2 in tandem and I was giving myself the Jerry to Jerry handshake (Rick and Morty).

      ?????

    1. Caches are shared across workflow runs but not across GitHub repos. We suspect, however, that any potential speed benefits of cross-project caching would be marginal at best.

      Is this because most serious users tend to pin to different nightly unstable derivations rather than a versioned release?

    1. Combat drones have improved in part because of advances in the consumer market. Ukraine is producing as many as 10,000 quadcopter drones per month using consumer electronics parts

      😭

  5. Nov 2023
    1. This is where I showcase the various images I've created over the years pursuing my hobby of using maths to create patterns. Wherever possible I've tried to provide explanations of how the patterns are generated and in some cases I've provided source code that you can download and adapt.

      A website is both a hobby and a life's work

    1. Apps must not force users to rate the app, review the app, download other apps, or other similar actions in order to access functionality, content, or use of the app.

      NICE

    1. Consider the Concurrent Versions System (CVS) as an example of what not to do. If in doubt, make the exact opposite decision

      Why?

    1. Tootsie Roll Industries (name adopted in 1966) is one of the largest candy manufacturers in the world. Over 65 million Tootsie Rolls are made daily

      Who is eating them???????????

    1. Even if it meant losing the story? Ogletree asked.

      If you make the story, don't

    1. there’s an AI research team that’s interested in the problem, hires a top PhD talent to work on it, and delivers a world-class math recognition API within 6 months.

      wow

    2. Shockingly, you get immediate access to all of it. Access to their gigantic monorepo🔗 with billions of lines of code covering almost all their products. Live statuses of their globe-covering data centers. Strategy documents spanning two decades of history. And direct access to legends.

      Biggest reason to work in big tech ---- to learn.

    1. I was in a van with two Americans, a Japanese, an older — supposedly famous — French illustrator, a Belgian artist, a Swedish photographer, and another Frenchman, drunk — quite obviously so — and driving.

      Why is he addressing the group so dis-affectionately - without attachment? Do these people not deserve to be mentioned by name?

  6. Oct 2023
    1. These are not optimists — they are the most naked cynics, believing that the current societal structures that empower and enrich them should be made more efficient

      Agreed. I don't understand why this essay has such a partial, hateful take on Andreessen - it is possible to have done good things and supported legitimate technological progress (largely in the past) while also (in more recent memory) backing crypto scams, inch-forward SaaS products, and crying about leftists.

      Both stories can be true. This new essay of his meanders and makes claims that aim to support his status quo moreso than they encourage legitimate societal progress. It is also true that technological optimism is the way to a bright future.

      Time to stop reading about Twitter - wait, X - trolls for the week.

    2. Technology has always solved Andreessen’s problems, but not through innovation or creativity other than that which increased the multiplier that a company could be sold for.

      Netscape wasn't impactful?

    3. Marc’s only real suggestion is that social justice or government regulation is bad, and that economic growth is good and makes people rich.

      This, though, is a more accurate summary. 'Social justice bad' rhetoric is tired; we have enough (ten years of) reactionary rhetoric on the timeline to make clear that most people have sane, pragmatic views of the world. Marc isn't ever going to change that with incel takes and Twitter replies. I'm with you there, author.

    4. they’ve done so by adding as many layers of tech to society as possible, for better (Stripe, Plaid) and for worse (Airbnb, Instacart, and every Web3 investment).

      I'm off-board here with this comment - blaming Airbnb is nuts. They are partially to blame for more people taking vacations - so more climate emissions and raising rental prices, especially in places with pre-existing housing shortages - but to claim so succinctly that Airbnb added technology to the world that made society worse is incorrect.

      Giving people a platform to make money off of their current property - and giving renters both a large financial backing and legal protection for visit mishaps - is valuable.

    1. unique "stooping" culture

      Have you lived in another city?

    1. It denies residency permits for men who practice polygamy

      America would never

    1. This work is postcardware. If you like it, please send me a postcard, message or email or post a comment.

      AWESOME

    1. all modern entertainment is generated and recommended by an algorithm

      AI wasn't good enough then; I think people just like copying each other

    1. But most importantly is that beautiful 16mm image that simply can not be replicated digitally. Picking up your DSLR will always be the easier option, and for some projects it may be the better way to go. But for those films that do call for that unmistakable 16mm look, the extra blood sweat and tears that go into the process are well worth it.

      Images are just pixels; they're directly recorded by digital hardware or scanned by digital hardware from analog hardware. Both work.

      The only benefit to shooting on film today is the native 'infinite' resolution if you're showing your original film reels. If the movie is cut analog and 70mm reels are made - like Oppenheimer's release (I think?) - that reel in theatres is going to be exceptionally beautiful.

      Most people, though, are not able to afford the luxury of seeing the original 70mm track; they're watching pixels on screens, and - whether recorded on film or digital - those pixels can be changed by digital editing software however we want.

      This take - along with the other posts raving about film simulations on the site - reveal a lack of education about the photographic process, how digital and analog sensors work, and how digital information is recorded. Learn more about something before advocating for it!!

    2. There are practical advantages too. For instance, shooting a low ratio means your edit time will be massively cut down. Less time and money is needed for post-production, including color grading as the film scans will likely be far closer to a final look than a digital negative might be.

      This can all be done in digital and with presets. Confused by this take.

    3. ilm changes the entire dynamic of what you shoot and how you shoot. It forces you to truly think about what you’re saying on a deeper level, and challenges you to be a more effective storyteller by using those creative limitations to your advantage.

      By increasing budget?

    1. or the person who hoped that maybe a lucky crypto buy could help them dig out of crushing debt just a tiny bit faster.

      No - this is the problem! You should not be promoting this! Nobody should be promoting this! This is just gambling with no regulation! How many people's savings have been ruined by these scams?

    2. How can we make information more available to everyone?

      How does cryptocurrency solve this?

    1. A partner who understands how we, as people, like to connect: in webbed and networked patterns. There’s an emphasis here on the people aspect of web3.

      Example?

    2. As a clinically trained social worker building web3 software tools to improve human relationships

      How does introducing financials to relationships - making them transactional by definition - improve them? Human relationships are built by establishing trust between people, not asking for microtransactions to contribute to particular causes

    1. Its code base is open-source—publicly available for anyone to download and comment on—and subject to peer review.

      It's not. The codebase used in production is not the same codebase they put on github and pretend to maintain.

    1. OpenAI’s ChatGPT, released as a research beta two days ago, has done to the standard high-school essay what cameras did to photorealistic painting and pocket calculators did to basic arithmetic.

      Maybe it's okay for students to learn to become editors, not writers

    1. First time I've heard the phrase 'artistically efficient'; one of the biggest lessons to learn from film even if working in other mediums. Film is about communicating ideas over the course of time, and establishing and setting pace is the distinguishing characteristic of the medium; music, photos, drawings - literally - cannot depict animation.

    1. Terse, written with discipline, somehow, but so, so full of love // this tore me up.

    1. While the medics are conferring with one another, Diana suddenly says, “I think I should go to the hospital.” The ambulance guys seem delighted by this. Diana is put on the stretcher, and the ambulance disappears. No one asks what I think should be done. No one asks me to come along. In the confusion, the blanket has been left on the front porch. When everyone is gone, I take it inside.

      This is incredibly sad

    1. I chose to stay near the entrance to observe.I'm so grateful for that choice. At one point, a waiter from the restaurant across the way braved the storm to retrieve some glasses, plates, and other items left outside. With my camera (a Fujifilm X100V) ready, I quickly turned it on and snapped the photo.

      You stood still to take the photo rather than helping???????????????????????????

    1. I asked to discuss monogamy and, in an effort to be the sort of cool girl who does not have so many inconvenient needs, I said that I didn’t need it. He said he thought we should be monogamous.

      Crazy twist

    2. When I found out that he’d kissed another girl on New Year’s Eve months after that, he said that we hadn’t officially discussed monogamy yet, and so I shouldn’t mind. I decided he was right.

      Oh

    3. When I found out that he’d slept with our mutual friend a few weeks after we’d first started seeing each other, he told me we hadn’t officially been dating yet so I shouldn’t mind. I decided he was right.

      Wild

    4. When men desire things they are “passionate.” When they feel they have not received something they need they are “deprived,” or even “emasculated,” and given permission for all sorts of behavior.

      I think the opposite is true in many circumstances.. the question becomes - "Why do you need help? Man up -- you should be able to do it yourself."

    1. It’s not a gimmick and I’m not being nostalgic,” he said. “It’s an effort to retain a meaningful core, something primal and mysterious.”

      Isn't this nostalgia, though?

    2. is eerily adept at capturing perfect moments in his pictures, although “perfect,” in his case, doesn’t mean glossy or unblemished.

      I want to know what he sees in others; his last interview makes me think that he just looks for flaws, for himself. Still surprised by how self-deprecating someone so accomplished is - the only thing he seemed affirmed by was his photo work.

    1. I chugged on my “Boost” Ripple. It’s the best one. It’s the fruitiest.

      Read 'funniest' at first --- would have made the paragraph. I still want it to be that

    2. Ripples look good on my kitchen countertop—all of the packaging and design is beautiful

      Still pining for the product endorsement

    3. But vapes look lame! They make you look lame, and they taste lamer!

      The switch in language tone here - almost childishly(?) finding something about the status quo to hold onto - makes the point

    4. I started smoking cigarettes because I couldn’t get a first kiss. I didn’t know how else to be cool, and everyone was kissing, and in order to get a first kiss, you have to find another willing participant, so at age 14 I bought my first pack of Marlboro Reds. I turned out to be good at smoking; maybe even the best.

      Lovely opener; incredibly vulnerable. 'I', 'I', 'I' in the best of ways. Quick lead and rambling second sentence to convey train of thought, then a quick third to set the stage - this essay isn't about the kissing or the cool or the age of fourteen; it's about cigarettes over a lifetime.

      • build understanding between people on teams
      • create psychological safety to speak up, to share parts of your life, to live with the people on your team, to a degree
      • always feel comfortable speaking up - maybe discussions are regulated, maybe not, but always passionate
    1. “Yeah, yeah, you like that,” with an intonation that made it impossible to tell whether he meant it as a question, an observation, or an order

      This is hard to read

    2. “Sorry!” he said.And then he asked, urgently, “Wait. Have you ever done this before?”

      Yikes

    3. But the next week he came into the movie theatre again, and bought another box of Red Vines. “You’re getting better at your job,” he told her. “You managed not to insult me this time.”She shrugged. “I’m up for a promotion, so,” she said.After the movie, he came back to her. “Concession-stand girl, give me your phone number,” he said, and, surprising herself, she did.

      This sounds confrontational - is that set up deliberately to build into the 'scaffolding of jokes' bit?

    4. “I don’t think I’ve ever actually sold a box of Red Vines before.”Flirting with her customers was a habit she’d picked up

      Incredible opener to this essay... we know we have a little confrontation, a little drama, a little grit

    1. Thank you for sharing. Meandering in just the right way.

    2. And he was blank like an advertisement, but his blankness was not artifice. It was a kind of refusal. He was perversely and resolutely blank, like a character in a Bret Easton Ellis novel, except with no money or class status.

      Having trouble picturing this - what kind of blank is it?

    3. I was with a new boyfriend.

      curt - not even a name

    4. You are busy being born for the whole long ascent of life, and then, after some apex, you are busy dying—that’s the logic of the line, as I interpret it

      No apex - life comes and goes

  7. Sep 2023
    1. with the sheer force of Mr. Dolan’s legendary stubbornness propelling it to completion

      incredible

    1. I. Me and My Hemorrhoids

      This intro is brilliant!! Instant fan of Wolfe. Gonzo, expressive, gripping.

    1. Google lawyers have explicitly argued that the judge should avoid allowing documents to become public solely because it is “clickbait.

      Insane

    1. The data is already there, all we have to do as designers and engineers is to build tools that reveal how expansive these platforms really are.

      How do we expose and explore tools for exploring content? Crazy!

    1. philosophy no longer knows its way around writing.

      Would love to see some context!! I want to know more - I want examples - what's wrong with it?

    1. In a diary kept during the winter of 1846, an emigrating twelve-year-old named Narcissa Cornwall noted coolly: "Father was busy reading and did not notice that the house was being filled with strange Indians until Mother spoke about it."

      Her cultural references are still unparalleled

    2. I had not been elected to Phi Beta Kappa.

      Didion's work has this sense of both being an outsider - someone curious - and someone who is distinctly - almost to the point of cliche - American.

    1. Tapwater creates a timeline for a project as it progresses. By including only the most important information in a linear, easy-to-follow flow, you and your team can effectively keep track of deliverables, milestones, and most importantly, the future.

      Cool... but it requires huge buy-in

    1. Back in ye olden days, most programming tasks I performed felt quite natural and painless, just a quiet little chat between me and the compiler. Sometimes longwinded, sometimes repetitive, but I just sat and thought and typed and software happened. The work I do these days feels more like being a dogsbody at the tower of babel. I just don’t seem to feel fluent in anything much any more.

      Work building tools feels too decentralized

    1. I saw the best minds of my generation destroyed by… toolmaking?

      Overabstraction, maybe

      I think it's awesome that lots of people develop bespoke tools and investigate new paths

      I think it's not awesome that so many of these are overly commercialized, doomed to die, and the work and thinking is thrown away rather than released and documented

    2. a sampling of startups

      There's the problem. The best way to make a good tool in software isn't necessarily to sell it to someone else.

    3. I’m worried that everybody wants to be one.

      What's wrong with that?

    1. Ironically, this page gets at least one thing wrong about web design - the state of the page isn't reconstructible from the URL. How else am I supposed to share my exact position in the experience with others? Use a query parameter at least!

    1. SSL Certificate My entire "grandpappy.org" website is covered by an SSL Certificate. You can easily verify this by looking at the Grandpappy web address in your browser window bar. If your browser shows a prefix before the "www" then it will show "https" instead of "http." The prefix "http" is for the world wide web without any special security. The prefix "https" is for those websites that have an SSL certificate and that certificate authenticates the identity of the website and the integrity of the data that is transferred.

      This is awesome. The author of this website is so proud.

    1. To the women and children who will sooner or later die by the hand of their partner and father, the message from the State, as from the media, is the same: suffer in silence.

      I hope that this piece was able to persuade some people - or at least help voices be heard. Really powerful writing

    2. On Sunday evening,

      The progression of this piece is brilliantly organized - though it ends just a bit too early (imo), the narrative example, the focus on language and sensitivity rather than description of crime, the wider discussion of the ways these events are documented and their impacts on a larger culture - great perspective. This was worth my time.

    1. These job descriptions are meaningless because the jobs themselves have no meaning.

      ??

      Not sure that Graber's "Bullshit Jobs" is an apt comparison here - he writes of middle management, of 'quiet firing' (a new term outside of the vernacular at the time of that book's publication), of grinding out features and pushing around paperwork.

      It's easy to say that the transformation of journalism as a field into content marketing, corporate strategy, TikTok and social media posting, is silly - but to me nobody knows how to address these marketing jobs because the circumstances change so often over time. The employee will have to adapt to new social media platforms and push new forms of content - it just so happens that the written word was the go-to for so many years.

    2. It's no longer enough to be a reporter, an editor—these titles carry with them the feel of specialization, as though their bearers are capable of doing "only" one thing. A "content strategist," though—that implies flexibility, a knowledge of a multitude of disciplines, the fortitude to work with brands, the ability to create video content that brings in far more ad dollars per 1,000 viewers than words alone on a web page.

      Ah, okay - this is someone upset about the changing of the times

    3. "Content" is the offender that springs most readily to mind. It's a catch-all now, hardly better than "stuff," for one-way communication: the listicle, the 6-second video, the 3,000-word article, the 45-minute video essay, the season of television. I use "content" as an insult, to designate writing I do that has no value.

      User error!! This is someone who isn't part of that community - the social media production sphere - and doesn't understand the new definition of the term. It is concrete - content now refers to anything published and released, anything that can advertise or provide leverage - and the term was necessary to describe work that now carries real financial stakes, like social media management

    4. I have been seeing more and more words permeating the vernacular that do not have any real meaning

      I think this is awesome

    1. This essay - though I didn't finish reading - reminds me of the benefits of 'outside art' - doing what I want without participating in the fragmented community discourse. Literary criticism is important, but as someone who doesn't want to dedicate myself to such a community or 'meta-community'. My membership in such a community will scale with the work I make - if others respond to what I do, I'll get involved, but otherwise there is no concern.

      I have no stakes though - my writing just lives in git and is visible-but-unlinked on my personal site.

    2. American society, the essay is to American literature

      American, American, American -- what makes American writing anymore? English dominates the internet - I'm typing this from Stockholm, as anyone who lives here could, as everyone here is practically fluent. How is the American blog post or article distinguished from the British one? The European?

      The only difference I see is the URL (though I'm accessing this page through archive.ph - so even that is redirected through another party). My Macbook is Swedish and uses a Swedish layout. The publication name - 'The Drift' - could be anywhere in the world.

      What makes it American?

    1. he got him “talking about things that family members don’t normally talk about. . . . The deeper, perhaps more disturbing things that he hadn’t come to terms with.”

      Isn't the interviewer following a script? Is the impact the human in the room?

    2. LifeBook could contract any local interviewer at a low rate of $50 per session, with no reimbursement for travel, to drive to the Author’s house, follow the prompt, and record the interview. As long as the interviewer stuck to the script, he or she was sure to produce what the Ghostwriter needed.

      This is formulaic labor that could be completely automated! Is the human in the loop to flatter the customer?

    3. it would be my job, as the Ghostwriter, to take the raw audio tapes, ninety minutes or more, and spend no more than two business days to turn them into biographical prose.

      How?

    4. a LifeBook biography was an heirloom-quality depiction of a life well lived.

      This business is dystopian - a beneficiary business class absorbing value from an industry, then commissioning members of that industry to write about their life and praise them - but it does give authors the opportunity to literally control the narrative of these people! Insane.

    1. I know the temptation. I never wanted kids. I was scrupulous about condoms and whatnot from the very beginning, because I knew that if I knocked someone up I would stick around, and I did not think of myself as the type of guy who makes a good father. I am vain and stingy with my attention to others. I like things tidy but put off chores. I’m funny but find other people’s laughter annoying.

      You're 37 - why not fix these things rather than accepting yourself as the type of person who fails at them?

      I'm confused by this passage, given the praise earlier of a growth mindset and the narrative that you are what you do every day. This segment about 'a type of person not making a good father', being 'vain and stingy with attention to others' makes me think that the author has taken no lessons from what they preach.

      The author's use of the word 'type' explicitly here makes me think that this passage is tongue-in-cheek - a satirical statement or an exaggerated admission of hypocrisy in himself - but the rest of the piece doesn't give any indication of the author being self-aware. I'm very confused.

    2. Ask any 12 year-old.

      This isn't representative of the 12-year-olds I've met... this feels too biased - a piece about a particular person and the media that they choose to consume - and that media's impact on them and their parents. I do think this phenomenon - this 'type' of 12 year old, ironically - exists, but I don't think it's representative of an average American 12 year old.

    3. I don’t know if you’ve checked in on tween culture lately, but it is roughly divided into two parts: incredibly boring rap songs about anti-anxiety medication and short internet videos about types of people.

      This feels incredibly diminishing! I grew up cutting through the noise and finding these interesting pockets of people on the internet, through the internet.

    1. Airbnb itself has in a way become gentrified.

      Airbnb became the default, but in some ways it was never designed to be?

    2. The homogeneity of these spaces means that traveling between them is frictionless

      Stockholm is starting to feel this way, and I'm likely part of the problem for rewarding this style - or is the Stockholm style, in part, influencing the rest of the world? Hard to call

    1. omakase, literally 'I leave it up to you',[3] is most commonly used when dining at Japanese restaurants where the customer leaves it up to the chef to select and serve seasonal specialties.

      i love it

    1. George R.R. Martin writes his novels on the 40 year old DOS operating system

      king

    2. I meal prep lunches every week, shave my head twice a week

      post proof

    3. without logos

      boring

    1. they all share the same principles and, in general, have a similar timeline

      Maybe there is some difference in language understanding - but I absolutely disagree! The act of designing a tool - something that is designed to be used by people, something that lasts - is so, so different from the design of ephemera used for advertising and documentation.

      (Documentation has a bit of overlap - it's designed to be revisited - so some aspects of graphic design are interesting, insofar as bookmaking is interesting)

    1. it creates more dishes (ugh!) and probably doesn’t represent the critical path (can’t I just slice my peppers while that onion is caramelizing?!).

      By freeing up this time, you relieve pressure on yourself - the process of cutting, slicing, prepping can be slower, more deliberate - making the dish better. The time can always be filled by cleaning during the cooking process, or it can be used to improve the quality of dish. Better to have too much time around than not enough - there are always more ways to allocate it.

    1. So far as he is serious, the artist is continually tempted to sever the dialogue he has with an audience.

      Why?

    1. the students who actually get in have very little or no training in the arts or humanities. I’ve learned to recognize the mostly straightforward and narrow claim for doing “art” that’s common at the Lab and among tech folks generally: They mean to indicate the non-useful, beautiful, or elegant results from their technical work, and they want to encourage some wacky or whimsical side projects on the path to technical feasibility.

      Is it possible to express yourself through technology without an intimate understanding of technology?

    1. measuring the values and movement of social capital

      Followers do not adequately measure this

    1. You can use them as inspiration, and possibly as a teacher, to improve.

      ASK QUESTIONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    2. You have to be OK with being better at them than other people.

      Working on this one still --

      • How do I gauge the skill level of the other person and talk to them in an appropriate manner without being dismissive?
      • How do I support someone and provide critique or help when they need it - only when they need it?
      • When is it appropriate to provide critique? When is it more important to step back and allow someone to learn from a mistake?
    1. unlike the tech innovators that came before him, he does not have a solid image or point of view. His persona is malleable, forever morphing to accommodate his followers

      He is a product of social media and social influence - maybe more than anyone else! He's become defined by how other people use Facebook, use Instagram, use Wbatsapp

    1. The people I met at Yale seemed to understand the world and its opportunities in a way that other people didn't.

      How so?

    1. A medium has a niche

      A medium is a technology designed to provide answers to a problem that can be solved or a desire felt by lots of people.

    1. If you're getting nose surgery, shave your moustache the night before.

      What happened?

    1. Bookmark after bookmark led to dead link after dead link. What's vanished: unique pieces of writing on kuro5hin about tech culture; a collection of mathematical puzzles and their associated discussion by academics that my father introduced me to; Woodman's Reverse Engineering tutorials from my high school years, where I first tasted the feeling of control over software; even my most recent bookmark, a series of posts on Google+ exposing usb-c chargers' non-compliance with the specification, all disappeared.

      Worst fear

    1. you can only roll back a change until you boot on the new version, then the changes are also applied on the previous boot, and you can't roll back.

      Why not support arbitrary upgrades? The complexity introduced to the user is limited, and Linux systems - or lists of package hashes - don't take up enough space to warrant saving. Weird tradeoff here.

    1. publishing in social media

      Interesting phrasing - to me, to 'share' on social media feels so much lighter than to 'publish'

    1. Playboy: Is it true your father once almost cut off your finger with an ax?Palahniuk: I was very young.

      Don't answer the question - tell the story!

    1. I want to be a good human.

      What does that mean to you?

    1. doing an apples-to-apples comparison with the Rust implementations, we found that our implementation was marginally faster on average for OpenAI tokenization, and a bit less than twice as fast on average for Anthropic tokenization

      Huh - must be good code. See GC pause note below, though - sometimes Rust is good. Rust written with a more imperative model would probably cook this alive.

      That doesn't make OCaml any less wonderful of a language, though!

    2. That’s where Rajeev’s project came in. Rajeev’s goal was to build an easier-to-use, SQL-like query language to act as a frontend to the LTL query engine. The language wouldn’t be quite as expressive as LTL, but it would be a lot easier to use.

      This is the right approach!

    1. Paraphrased: "Releasing music feels like a funeral in a way... it's no longer mine."

    1. I do not drive a car, I am a user of public transport.

      King

    1. Anything Rick Owens does, you know immediately it’s Rick Owens. If he writes a text or designs a garment, or if he does a piece of furniture — it’s so coherent.

      The goal

    1. “It’s not relevant,” he interrupted. “By writing for that paper, you legitimize their stance. Therefore, our friendship must end here and now. As I said, this pains me a lot.” That was the last time we spoke.

      What is life like to live like this?

    1. the lamp I want costs more than a year’s worth of childcare for my toddler

      always phrase costs with alternatives

      • Marriage is a lottery ticket - risk reward is huge, but if you land it the payoff is wonderful. Hedge the risk with a prenup!
      • Marriage - and any law - is a technology that's human-centered. It hasn't been updated to keep up with independence, with social media, with the status quo. (This is by design; laws should be crafted slowly and deliberately. It's still true that the law is not reflective of what is moral or fair today. A prenuptual agreement guarantees that your divorce principles reflect your morals rather than those of the court).
  8. Aug 2023
    1. Being offered a role that requires relocating when your boss knows moving isn’t a viable option for you

      This should be illegal

    1. There should always be an option to add GoatCounter to your site without requiring a GDPR consent notice.

      Goated

    1. LLVM became at least as good as GCC, and a less risky decision for big companies, and easier to use to build new languages

      Yup. - Managed by org with strong and consistent funding - More accessible to workplaces - More contributors, inside and outside the company, because of these - Better software

    2. those freedoms don't actually mean shit to the average end user. only programmers care if they have access to the source code, and most people aren't programmers.

      How do we empower people to make this privilege worthwhile? I don't think the problem is that people don't care - everyone has opinions or issues about glitches, problems they face in the software they use every day. The problem is that the barriers to entry - 0 to programming and modifying an app - are so, so great

    1. the series received a five-minute standing ovation following the screening of its first two episodes, which is considered a normal to lukewarm audience reaction

      The premiere is evaluated based on how long people stand and clap?????

    1. A research lab. We built quarterly prototoypes exploring machine learning capabilities. I designed and built the front-end for experiments exploring capabilities like summarization, sentiment analysis, and prediction. I also led design for the branding and print reports.

      What a beautiful work environment! I dream of something like this.

    1. I’ve tended to end up on less opinionated/purist tools that adopt many of the ideas they’ve pioneered with dwm and particulary dmenu

      The engineering behind these tools is brilliant, but most people want good defaults moreso than they want to be able to build software from scratch.

    2. tabbed - a generic tab primitive

      This is how all tabs should work! Everything in the operating system should be indexed with the same tab/window primitives. Imagine how much easier navigating an operating system would be...

    1. Museums are an important aspect of English culture, and almost every city and town have extensive museums and art galleries

      Where'd they find what to put in the museums? There aren't so many British artists...

    1. Create APIsExport your code as public to create an API endpoint.Email yourselfSend yourself an email as easily as you log to the console.

      Really baller

      Text message and call next

    1. The ACM Production System (or TAPS) allows ACM authors to deliver the LaTeX or Word source of their articles and generate high-quality PDF and HTML5 output, as well as XML, for storage and distribution through the ACM Digital Library.

      dystopian

    1. mold is so fast that it is only 2x slower than the cp command on the same machine. If you find that mold is not faster than other linkers, please feel free to file a bug report.

      legend

    1. Physical whiteboards physically encourages revision. Cross things out, erase them.

      Interesting! Wondering to what degree uses use photos to 'diff' whiteboards vs. living with losing everything but the end result. GIt and file corruption has made me paranoid of losing anything and everything in my life.

    1. Christopher Alexander’s A Pattern Language (1977)

      Goated. The Oregon Project changed the world. I don't think U of O is the best campus, but the fact that Alexander could point to a system that worked - well enough - helped broadcast his ideas on a world stage.

      I don't think that prescriptivist community design works as well as we'd like it to, though, especially with such rapid technological advancement. There has to be some central vision or respect for how the environment changes. Considering the current needs of the community doesn't necessarily accommodate future needs. (Yes, some of the patterns have provisions for this - and I know they're suggestions.)

    2. ‘Design’ remains synonymous with maximizing control.

      Disagree

    3. User-centered design

      Descriptivist

    4. he clean, geometric forms of Brasilia do little to support the inherent messiness of daily life for real people.

      Brasilia wasn't designed or built to support people! It was designed to broadcast a modern, futuristic nation with a space-age seat of governance.

      There are images of tanks rolling through the city a few years after its construction. Turns out that building an international arts reputation doesn't work when you don't respect your local population. World powers have to be built from within. American coups everywhere in South America didn't help. Sorry Brazil.

    5. The mid-20th century saw the apex of high modern design. This paradigm was characterized by a hubristic disregard for context, history, and social complexity in favor of an imposed rational order and universal standardization. “Rational” in this paradigm describes a state of superficial geometric efficiency as conceived by the designer.

      Was context and social complexity disregarded? This really depends on where you're looking. This is an extremely common cricitism of Soviet - and welfare state (like Sweden) - architecture during the time, building these huge, monolithic buildings throughout a city very quickly.

      Honestly, I think large, cheap, and hastily constructed apartment buildings work, even the soviet ones. Sure, they fall apart - but everything has a lifespan and buildings are no exception. it's okay to build for two, three, four generations if you understand that the dynamics of your city will change significantly during that time period - you'll be able to more easily reroute and reconstruct the city around new ideas that better fit the population then. Building monolithically was fine for rapid growth.

      (Note: The American 'Projects' are the biggest example of large-scale socialized housing failure. The lack of lighting, cramped spaces, and lack of public safety in those places has made them terribly unsafe for everyone involved. America doesn't know how to respect poor people)

      Many of these 'imposing', 'universally standardized' buildings can and have been retrofitted to fit Louise Sullivan(?)'s four part division of a building - repurposing the first floor for shops, for example, and clearing space for a courtyard in the center. Architecture isn't a finished product; buildings can be modified and transformed with the times.

      The car, also, dramatically changed the urban landscape. How do we build cities to acknowledge the universal access that a car provides? Why might cars be good and bad for cities? I don't think anyone fully understood the problem at the time.

      The tradition that was respected during the time wasn't ordamentation. Most of the buildings are plain, 'brutal' (haha), and a bit ugly. The respect for public parks and spaces, though, learned from the British work very deliberately crafting nature - first the grounds of palaces, then the public garden and park, was translated to so many spaces across America and Europe. Brutalism, functionalism, and modernism had an understanding of how to leave space for people.

      Sure, if we knew more about the smartphone and the car and the bicycle as modes of transport and communication that could be planned for, we would have. I don't think the era was particularly transformative - but I think cities, like Stockholm, that rapidly expanded with these principles in mind were left better off for the future.

    6. the long-tail problem

      New customer, new feature, new customer, new feature, more general... soon you have an everything machine.

    1. It is very clear that the EMFs & Heat from your phone (if you leave it in your pocket) contribute to a reduction in sperm quality and testosterone.

      Oops

    1. Jack Dorsey, the Twitter co-founder, who credited Mr. Masnick as an inspiration for the creation of Bluesky, a Twitter clone that embraced that approach.

      Instead of supporting FOSS alternatives, creating your own capitalistic, for-profit solution adn trying to strongarm it into a robust ecosystem. Nice

    2. Mr. Masnick suggested that Mr. Zuckerberg consider decentralizing.

      King

    3. a laptop with a slide-out second screen

      how???

    4. Mr. Masnick has written more than 51,000 (often lengthy) blog posts, adding more several times a day

      Holy prolific. Goals. This is someone who loves their work and loves opinion. That's way more than 10,000 hours

    5. A wall of text, heavy on hyperlinks, it has not evolved much since its founding.

      It's beautiful. You just don't understand

    1. For the first time, in 2023, the organisers have implemented sustainability requirements for participating fashion brands.

      This is so good! Explains why they don't have the showing of previous years though - lol.

    1. Stine Goya held a show on her own street, Eckersberggade in the Kartoffelrrækkerne in Copenhagen.

      Like LaRussell in the bay - rebellious. Bring it home. Control the thing yourself!

    1. Scanning books is pretty clearly fair use. What you do with that later could violate copyright law, but I don’t see anything that Prosecraft did that comes anywhere even remotely close to violating copyright law.

      Boring. Anti-accelerationist.

    1. This case raged on for several years until it ended up in the Swedish supreme court in 2016, where the court sided with BUS, declaring that Wikimedia did not have the right “to communicate photographs of works of art permanently placed outdoors from its database to the public via the internet. Whether the disposal has a commercial purpose is irrelevant.”

      NOOO

    1. is a dedicated CrossFit practitioner

      Oop - whatever keeps you going

    2. Certain elements of the “Whole Earth Catalog” haven’t aged particularly well: the pioneer rhetoric, the celebration of individualism, the disdain for government and social institutions, the elision of power structures, the hubris of youth.

      What's wrong with that?

      Many of the issues in San Francisco today are caused by overbearing government, not avoidance of it.

    1. Brand was born in Rockford, Illinois, and attended Phillips Exeter Academy in New Hampshire. He studied biology at Stanford University, graduating in 1960.[2] As a soldier in the U.S. Army, he was a parachutist and taught infantry skills; he later expressed the view that his experience in the military had fostered his competence in organizing.

      Why did so many highly educated, bicoastal, clearly wealthy and smart people join the U.S. army after their educations? Some were inspired by their time in the army - like Herman Melville, Joseph Heller, and apparently Stewart Brand - but for someone of this status to join the armed forces today would be practically unheard of outside of some West Point trajectory. I'd love to know more about, and somehow experience, the attitude that the American people had about the US military then.

    1. Many YouTube creators build their massive audiences through sociopathic stunts, and it’s not surprising when the creators turn out to be sociopathic in real life.

      To me, this reveals that the author largely consumes traditional media sources, eschewing the communication streams that people use. This is true, but no different from traditionally mainstream come-ups - look at the Sex Pistols' stunts that shot them to stardom (as cited below). Look at Marilyn Manson. The bad examples are exceptions, not the rule.

      Traditional media outlets have slow, aging customers and are losing numbers. Their job is to criticize change and sensationalism. Crime is bad, so of course it's all they cover.

    2. Why hasn't a decade been enough time for DIY online video creators to turn their view counts into mainstream stardom?

      I think the author's categorizations are flawed. Social media still runs discovery of video creators. Some people bridge the gap to mainstream success, get signed to labels, etc. and abandon their social channels. Others continue to use those channels.

      The creators in the latter category likely haven't received the institutional support they'd like because - as the author says - they just don't have qualities that beget institutional support or traditional marketing techniques. They stay DIY creators.

      Again - Sex Pistols? Look at Lil Nas X. Look at every rapper besides Drake in the last ten years coming up off of SoundCloud hits and TikToks; half of them are fiercely label-independent and still demand mainstream recognition.

      There are no examples of modern creators cited in this article. There are so many examples that can be used.

    3. For every actor in a Hollywood film, we assume exceptional dramatic skills, or at least, natural beauty.

      Again - this gap is actively being bridged. A24 is obliterating Marvel. Euphoria picked up most of its cast off the street and made average people (with great talent) superstars. This is imagined and projected by the author. Mainstream media events have had to accommodate those popular on social media to stay relevant, not the other way around.

    4. Internet stardom bestows no glamor

      Have you seen how people worship Charli D'Amelio? The Kardashian family? Where have you been?

    5. But would anyone say that Bella Poarch is “famous” the way that the Seinfeld gang are famous?

      No, and I don't think it's the case that she is 'less famous' in any way; fame from social media looks so different from industry-produced fame that it's hard to compare.

      There are tons of counterexamples.

      Lil Nas X bridged the gap here, as have so many other 'creators' that have found endorsement, sponsorship - read MONEY - from traditional, pre-social-media institutions.

      Anyone working with technology will know who MKBHD and Linus Tech Tips are.

      This article is written from the author's perspective. The author may be someone who consumes media from 'traditional channels' - television - and it's true that these people haven't broken through in that way. If you ask someone on the street or index the billboards in Times Square, though, CNN and the real world tell different stories.

    1. They think that technology is something that you write a check for and buy.

      I've noticed this from DAW reviews; It's good to think of music as a tool - and to extent, these grooveboxes are mashed together to make new by plugging them into modular setups and such - but most of them are of poor build quality, running shit microcontrollers and underpowered tech, have little to no memory, and the companies pass this all off as 'limitation' that 'breeds creativity'.

      I call bullshit. You can make a two thousand dollar product as big as an Elektron and have the budget to throw an 100 gig SSD in and a Beaglebone off the shelf. that's less than 100 bucks for some brilliant, capable hardware that can hold anything. The screens have 20 pixlels? What the hell?

      Teenage engineering understands. They provide actual brilliant value in packages that nobody else can make. They fit a niche and make the best product in that niche. Their pricing model isn't great now - but the next generation of their products has the potential, I think, to go beyond what's okay.

    2. Apple is a very visible American company

      This is another theme throughout the work - a constant reiteration that Apple is American.

      I haven't grown up with a strong American identity or with any sort of great faith in my country of birth. I grew up with immigrants mostly, kids whose parents brought with them these intricate legacies, carrying some sort of struggle or journey, spoken or unsaid, that ends with them settling down in the United States. I couldn't see the same story in my upbringing - America is just where I was born and was growing up. Everyone seemed to be going with the flow.

      The political climate I've grown up in has a lot to do with this, but Jobs' political climate seems quite unstable; from Vietnam to Clinton to now 9/11 and Bush, where my American political consciousness kind of begins. I want to know where this American faith comes from. Should I have it? I don't even live in America anymore.