5 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2025
    1. "She shot out from the back bedroom with a howl, was through the living room and up into my arms, leaping up onto me, her arms locked around my neck, her legs wrapped around my waist, 95 pounds that felt no more than 30. She was crying into my hair, squeezing her legs tighter. It was not a greeting as much as it was a claim: She was staking out this spot on my chest as her own, and I was to hold her for as long as she wanted to stay." Observation: Ann Patchett recounts years of caretaking for Lucy — helping her recover from surgeries, managing finances, and emotionally supporting her through depression and addiction. Interpretation: This highlights a feminist issue of emotional labor, especially in female friendships. Ann gave more than companionship — she carried Lucy when the systems failed her. Connection: Feminist criticism often looks at how women are expected to care for others, even at the cost of their own well-being. Ann’s role brings attention to how friendship between women can become a form of unpaid emotional work.

    1. "Mai Xia and I chatted "If I ,now," she told me "I' H . were,n t Hmong, I'd be finishing college· m mong and Im a mother."By February Mai Xia had quit her · ob L · . .before Georgina was born, Mai Xia cal/ed. o:' Iron. In Apnl, six weeks the ca l endar, counting but not th d agam. S he had been watchmg she figured, must have 'fin1·s h d l e ] ay bs to delivery. Her old girlfriends, S e co ege y now.he was twenty-three years old." **Observation: Sue Murphy Mote had direct access to Mai Xia Cha and could ask questions about culture, family, and values. Patchett wrote about Lucy from lived experience and memory. Interpretation: While Mote’s portrayal feels more “objective” or researched, Patchett’s account is deeply emotional and intimate. This reflects two types of storytelling: one as a journalist/observer and one as a participant. Connection: This reflects a larger feminist discussion about how women’s lives are recorded — through emotional truth (like memoirs) or cultural/historical documentation (like ethnography). Both are valid but serve different purposes in feminist literature. **

  2. Sep 2025
    1. Intersectional feminism: If feminism is advocating for women's rights and equality between the sexes, intersectional feminism is the understanding of how women's overlapping identities — including race, class, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation and disability status — impact the way they experience oppression and discrimination.

      Intersectional feminist is a feminist that are mainly interested in the equality between the sex and this may include race class, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientations, and disability status.

    1. In the 19th century women's fashions became more sexual - the hips, buttocks and breasts were exaggerated with crinolines, hoopskirts and corsets which nipped in the waist and thrust out the breasts. The female body was dressed to emphasise a woman's separation from the world of work. By wearing dresses that resembled their interior furnishings, women became walking symbols of their social function - wife, mother, domestic manager.

      In the 19th century, women's fashion became sexual, showing off the attributes of a woman's body that meant, different significant parts. This emphasize what the woman meant to the world as a wife mother, a domestic lover.

  3. Aug 2025
    1. They accuse you of hurting them, & if you think it is not unwillingly but by designe, you must look upon them as murderers

      In this source, the speaker is pressuring the accused by saying, “They accuse you of hurting them, & if you think it is not unwillingly but by designe, you must look upon them as murderers.” What I see here is an early example of interrogation tactics that are still recognizable today—getting people to confess to things they may not have done. The logic being pushed is that if the accused did not hurt the children by accident, then it had to be intentional, and therefore she is the one guilty. The trap in the statement is that it flips the blame onto the children, making them seem like the true “murderers,” so in the accused’s eyes anything she might have done to them would appear justifiable. It connects to Context, since understanding the fear of witchcraft and the religious panic in 1692 helps explain why this kind of statement would carry so much weight in Salem.