how chatbots can be incorporated responsibly into the practice of law.
it's not to say chatgpt is completely bad, it has resources that can help you expand and improve on your original work with it still being your original work and not falsified.
6 Matching Annotations
- Last 7 days
-
www.nytimes.com www.nytimes.com
-
-
Mr. Mata’s lawyers responded with a 10-page brief citing more than half a dozen court decisions, with names like Martinez v. Delta Air Lines, Zicherman v. Korean Air Lines and Varghese v. China Southern Airlines, in support of their argument that the suit should be allowed to proceed.
the brief contained false cases, why include fake cases knowing they might be looked into? all to proceed a lawsuit
-
where there has been a growing debate about the dangers — even an existential threat to humanity — posed by artificial intelligence. It has also transfixed lawyers and judges.
it is indeed a "existential threat to humanity" the more we lean on chat the less we are capable of thinking for ourselves since we'll come to believe that chatgpt automatically "knows everything".
-
the lawyer had created a legal brief for a case in Federal District Court that was filled with fake judicial opinions and legal citations, all generated by ChatGPT.
main topic of article
-
Mr. LoDuca told Judge Castel that he had no role in conducting the research. Judge Castel questioned Mr. LoDuca on Thursday about a document filed under his name asking that the lawsuit not be dismissed.“Did you read any of the cases cited?” Judge Castel asked.“No,” Mr. LoDuca replied.“Did you do anything to ensure that those cases existed?”AdvertisementSKIP ADVERTISEMENTNo again.
how is he not aware of a document under his own name?
-
“There’s a sense that this is not something that we can mull over in an academic way. It’s something that has affected us right now and has to be addressed.”
chatgpt is starting to develop an everlasting effect that should be handled now rather than later.
-