States order race starting with “white” and “Black” as the first two options.
I've noticed in a few recent surveys that the order of race is more frequently randomized or "white" is the last option - progress!
States order race starting with “white” and “Black” as the first two options.
I've noticed in a few recent surveys that the order of race is more frequently randomized or "white" is the last option - progress!
ommonly used charts and graphs like bar charts, line charts, and pie charts, while informative, can abstract the content by collapsing all the people represented into one shape.
So true! I've done this way too frequently and dehumanize the information. I like the idea of reminders that we are looking at people rather than dots.
You can't feel empathy for a point on a map, but you can feel empathy for a mom who’s crying. –KIM BUI
Such a true statement in education. Spending the first part of my career in the "No Child Left Behind" standardized data-driven era feels like stories and empathy were put to the wayside and I was conditioned to focus on academic improvements / numbers without putting people first or considering all the factors at play.
Our finding that Black, first-generation males have the lowest probability of persisting in any major is supported by research on Black male retention in higher education literature. However, our finding that Latinx, non first-generation females have the highestpersistencewas surprisingconsidering that in aPWI, we would expect White females and/or males to persist at higher numbers than their peers of coloras evident in the review of literature.
I think this is fascinating to consider the intersectional factors at play; it poses questions as to why this is is the case for the differences across identity markers.
That is, BIPOC women more often tend to report having experienced hostile, racist, and sexist working environments in STEM(Castellanos, 2018; Chaleston et al., 2014; Reyes,2011).
Angering - I'd like to read these three articles.
Only about 16% of undergraduates in the USchose STEM as a career major, compared to higher percentagesfor other countries(up to 47% in China), which can not only be detrimental to the USeconomy, but to the global market (National Science Board, 2010)
Oof - I wouldn't have predicted such a disparity in choosing stem paths. I didn't realize how high of percentages graduates elect into STEM fields in other countries. This answers many questions!
Current introductory chemistry courses mitigate many educa-tional debts and eliminate educational debts from racism forAsian, Hispanic, and White Hispanic men.
I appreciate the hope that exists through this study. Progress is made, and much like the Castillo / Babb article that references progress rather than the unrealistic dismantling of systemic racism.
All ofthe society’s educational debts from sexism were larger thanthe uncertainty in the measurement
Very sad but unsurprising.
To what extent have sexism and racism creatededucational debts of chemistry knowledge that society
From what I have learned in other articles in the course, I predict to a great extent.
One example is the charge for media outlets to cover the disappearance of non-white youth with the same vigor that is afforded missing white women, what has been termed ‘the missing white girl syndrome’. The charge for the media’s self-awareness of centering missing non-white victims has been around since at least 2005 (Liebler 2010; Stillman 2007).
Great example - I hadn't thought about this white-centered phenomenon before even though my mom and family are obsessed with "missing white girls"
They are often a common practice for qualitative work, but rarely used in science or quantitative studies
This is a practice that should change - regardless of the type of study, it's helpful to understand the researchers' contexts.
We also recognize that applying any framework and set of practices will not dismantle systemic racism; however, as a field, we are developing tools and strategies to begin reimagining the role that research and data can play in an anti-racist society. B
This is well said and sets expectations for the reader.
mpacts of gender or race gaps but the impacts of sexism and racism
I wonder how this sits with researchers at large, particularly those who may have personal and political affinities that may deny some of these impacts on others.
ond gender and race, including ableness, religious affiliation, and socioeconomic status
The unique experience of oppressed and oppressors is so unique and influenced by time and space. Understanding the complexities of intersectionality is imperative to constantly be asking oneself how they might be acting as an oppressor in any given scenario.
A common practice in educational research tends to clump the experiences of low-income students together when studying inequity. Jack (2019) demonstrates how qualitative research has the power to capture variations within groups not easily noticeable
I've been converted myself to leaning toward quantitative methods to qualitative over the course of this program. I appreciate both for sure, and both have their time and place. But the power of the qualitative studies, for me, can capture the nuances of lived experiences in ways that quantitative can't always do.
By grap-pling with their positionality, researchers can better understand the strengths and limitations of their lenses and thus their work.
This is not as easy to write as I was expecting - we all included these statements in our Qualitative Research Methods project and naming the implications / connections required a lot of introspect and nuance.
Additionally, it is important to acknowledge that STEM fields have a history of conducting research, creating theories, and making measurements that primarily centered white, cisgen-dered, male, heterosexual, able-bodied, wealthy individuals (Harding, 2006)
I wonder how much this is related to a lack of background in historical context for these researchers...
Critical theories explore how his-torical events and society have shaped present-day experiences and understandings of how the world functions
This requires a depth of historical and social knowledge. This comprehensiveness required as a researcher will inevitably vary across researchers, which makes research for the researchers important.
one might expect politicians, policy-makers and academics to be more circumspect in their behaviour
No longer. Trust I once held has been put on pause (maybe permanently) with wild claims and misuse of statistical claims.
trade on deficit assumptions, and working with minoritized communities and activist groups to provide more insightful, sensitive
A lot of this conversation is closely aligned to research on trading deficit / fixed mindset and language for growth and asset-based language in the classroom as well.
complex, fluid and changing characteristic
Like exploring research in schools, this makes true scientific research where a singular variable is changed quite challenging to study. So many factors are constantly at play.
‘the most widely read statistics book in the history of the world’ (Steele,2005)
Irony, perhaps - this type of statistic is the first that comes to my mind of those that are most skeptical for me. Most, best, and wide generalizations hit me in ways of needing to dig deeper about sources of claims such as this.
nceptual Model of the Study’s Antecedent-Opportunity-Propensity Framework.Note. Adapted from Byrnes and Miller
I appreciate this theoretical framework / graphic as I begin to think about my own. It would be interesting to read the Byrnes and Miller article as well.
found that, for premed students who completedtheir degrees, poor experiences in chemistry courses explainedthe large decrease in minoritized students’interest in andpursuit of medical degrees.
There's a lot of potential examination of root causes of factors that lead up to this point in the lives of students.
For women, society owed the largest educationaldebts from racism to White Hispanic (5.3 percentage points)and Black (4.6 percentage points) students.
Interesting breakdown of language - what is "owed" most.
As such, we follow Ladson-Billings’11,12framing of inequities in group performance as educationaldebts that society owes students due to their continualmarginalization.
Well framed. I appreciate the direct connection to the previous reading / podcast with Ladson-Billings in grounding this principle.
(6.2%) or Hispanic (7%)
These numbers are insanely low - less than half of the national population.
educational debts
Ladson-Billings term from previous article directly in research question aimed at addressing problematic nature of "achievement gap" focus.
ol the thinking. Let us call it "strategic reinvestment" when we simply mean firing people from their jobs. Let us call it "a personal savings account" when we are actually referencing the dismantling of social security, the one safety net that most of the poor can count on. Let us call it "No Child Left Behind" when we mean disinvesting from public education and cradle-to-grave testing. I argue that we need to change the discourse from achievement gap to what I have termed an "education debt" (Lads
Lipstick on a pig? The grounding is all still the same: deficit-minded application of how student's "should be" rather than open-mindedness of alternative ways of thinking / celebration of cultures.
o at age 5. Interestingly, the most affluent parents have the luxury of doing what Graue and DiPerna (2000) referred to as "academic redshirting." This means they have the resources - both human and fiscal - to hold their children ou
This is a good point. Working at a high-school level I don't often think about this early education issue. However, the impacts are felt for years.
. In 2007, we can still walk into schools and hear the following explanations for poor students' of color school failure:
It's now 2025 and some of these statements are still occurring...
allows us to conclude that the problem lies solely in the realm of scholastic disparit
This is a good point, and not only feels reductive but focused on an assumption that these measurements are equitable / the correct tools.
Greater use of special education data may help prevent future systematic failures to identify and serve eligible students with disabilities. Wider use of quantitative data could uncover other inequities deserving of attention.
I appreciate the increase in public data for this particular issue, and also struggle with our nationwide debate about data accessibility on a more holistic level. Our current political landscape bringing light to this debate significantly.
We argue here that emphasis on quantitative data analysis for social justice can and should be an essential feature of preparation programs.
Yes! This approach is essential to build wide understanding of critical analysis. As many are afraid of numbers / math themselves, it becomes easy to manipulate to tell your own story. The more we can encourage folks to question and critique quantitative data, the more difficult it becomes to be manipulated. I think this analysis of social justice data should occur at very early ages through all of education.
“dynamic model.”
Why can't everything be a "dynamic model"? The reality is so much more harmful...