this is a great way to give students a good idea of what they could say, how to present their work/ give them something to work off of and give them the opportunity to present in what way works best for them

wow...i found this super interesting! I think this certainly goes a long way in legitimizing the industry

they both serve as subordinating the other/work against each other when they do not work together...when they work separately—highlighting the importance of intersectionality.

essentially they would have to be put in the hospital due to injuries inflicted by the spouse...which means they would have to be beaten really badly AND....for this to happen this likely means these women would had put up with way more abuse up to this point.

I want to understand this in more depth

this has really resonated with me

this is a really great question as this directly holds in the balance the purpose of government support and is it support at all, or a ploy to gain control over women?

but why do we have to give one up to have the other?

this is interesting...define protectors rules.

i mean that what many of my teachers were doing...

what is this?

its really insane to me that after we took their land, we simultaneously treated indigenous people as second class citizens while stealing from their culture and way of life. Which is more proof that these were racist charged actions?

literally just made a note of that!!! I am on the right track.

a concern i have with this "ranking" style is that we don't fully understand the scope of discrimination and how that impacts these different groups. Furthermore, to posit these different groups seems to make the observation that one is treated better than the other, however, that doesn't really inform on how those within these "different groups" actually feel on the ground.

The quality of being interior or inward.

This offering is particularly challenging to the current understanding of borders many country leaders have. Which prompts my question:

How could reimagining the "idea," "process," or notion of a border affect or make more effective international relations/foreign policy? Through this reimagination, would/could relationships internationally generate a more meaningful working relationship?

I feel like this...long...sentence has much to unpack. In short, I feel this sentence is a loose mention of the idea that we may have differing countries with borders "on paper," but that doesn't disclude the idea that, especially when thinking in terms of individuals from different (neighboring) countries (for example—the distance from Toronto Canada to Buffalo NY), they may have similar ideologies even thought their governments are different.

The question erects the notion the area around a border "line" where that line may not be as clear as the map dictates.

When I think of the beginning idea of borders, one thing I think of, as mentioned in class a few times, are the times of monarchism and their borders around the kingdoms.

So it is an engaging contrast that we are studying the idea of borders in a place that once had the stereotypical kingdom walls, to now where they are fairly borderless.

There are many aspects that go into geopolitics (which is basically international relations) that may influence how discussions are held or how decisions are made—what is the impact or influence of religion on geopolitics?

I think this question is particularly interesting question to pose as the answer would look different for the person you ask (even currently) from those from different periods of time. Meaning if we went way back into monarchism—those individuals would likely say the stone wall around their kingdom (potentially). Currently, there isn't necessaryily a need for a physical border wall (unless you are certain people) because there, arguably, aren't really any borders in modern civilization. Most countries allow people to travel to their country and there isn't a physical border separating them rather a sort of marker. Another interesting concept this begins to dip into, is the idea of ideologies. Even though there is a "border" separating different countries—is there a border separating ideologies that may be similar even though they exist in different countries.

A branch of mathematics concerned with those properties of geometric configurations (such as point sets) which are unaltered by elastic deformations (such as a stretching or twisting) that are homeomorphisms.