9 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2024
    1. logitp[i] <- alpha + beta * voc[i] p[i] <- exp(logitp[i]) / (1 + exp(logitp[i])) observed[i] ~ dbin(p[i], 1)

      For next edition, rewrite all JAGS code so that the order/format matches how we write down equations describing our models. E.g.:

      response variable ~ statistical distribution(parameters) transformation(parameters) <- linear predictor

  2. May 2024
    1. varcovEYhat<-xmat%*%Sigmahat%*%t(xmat)

      Compare to predictSE.gls() in the AICcmodavg package (which I just learned of)! Note, the above only provides SEs for CIs and not PIs.

  3. Feb 2024
  4. Jan 2023
    1. Yes, that would be another option. However, the goal here is to introduce alternative methods specifically developed for count data - rather than compare all options. Also, there are potential reasons to prefer these alternative models - again, see Warton et al. 2016 (though, it is not always going to be a clear cut decision - and, fixing type I error rates may require resorting to atlernative (resampling- and permuation-based methods)..

  5. Aug 2022
  6. Jul 2022
    1. Luque-Fernandez et al

      Add:

      @article{addicott2022toward, title={Toward an improved understanding of causation in the ecological sciences}, author={Addicott, Ethan T and Fenichel, Eli P and Bradford, Mark A and Pinsky, Malin L and Wood, Stephen A}, journal={Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment}, year={2022}, publisher={Wiley Online Library} }