30 Matching Annotations
  1. Dec 2020
    1. Elouise Cobell was born on the Blackfeet Reservation in 1945, the middle of nine children. Her parents had a small ranch, and like many reservation families at the time, they didn’t have electricity or running water

      This correspond to the later primary sources I've found (For week 7 I think) that Native American communities are suffering from lack of public infrastructures and services such as education and health care

    1. he Indian as incommensurable savag

      This reveals why the United States believe it was OK to take over Native Americans land as they do not consider two as equal entities, but one more superior than the other.

    1. rt. 2. The Shawanoe nation, do acknowledge the United States to be the sole andabsolute sovereigns of all the territory ceded to them by a treaty of peace, made betweenthem and the King of Great-Britain, the fourteenth day of January, one thousand sevenhundred and eight-fou

      This article sounds like what a bully would say at school. You shall recognize my right to be on this land, and therefore it is my right to take it over.

    1. “Domestic Dependent Nations”

      I am not an expert in this field, but I found this term itself very ironic as nations should be independent and have sovereignty. I think this term was created and defined at the time to suit its political purposes.

    1. Instead, current citizens of the Five Tribes today exercise the privileges ofdual citizenship and have the opportunity to participate in state and federal elections, inaddition to tribal participation

      I think this is one of the few things that you can only find in the United States.

    1. ut nevertheless these Indians have rightswhich should be respected, and these rights the pro -posed legislation would treat with utter disregard.

      If this belief is respected and truly followed, I think there would be less tragedies and hostilities between the United States government and the Native American community.

    1. That a perpetual peace and friendship shall from henceforth take place, and subsist between the contracting: parties aforesaid, through all succeeding generations:

      They signed this treaty hoping that the United States government would continue this treaty for generations, but after just a few, I think the government forgot their promises and saw Native Americans as barriers to their development and advancement.

    1. This powerful coalition made it clear to Britain that the only way to prevent them from attacking the colonies and starting another costly war was to prevent Virginians from occupying the highly desired land in Kentucky.

      War is not only costly to the Britain and the colonists, but also to the Native Americans tribes.

    1. "They are worse than those we had on Guadalcanal,'.' is the way one Navaho ex-Marine summed it up. In summer, the roada are heaps of sand; in winter. mountains of mud.

      If this is referring to Guadalcanal that I know from the Pacific War, I can imagine the condition the infrastructure is really really bad at that period of time.

    1. ARTICLE 1. From this dav forward all war between the parties to /eace this agreement shall forever cease. The Government of the United s ip. States desires peace, and its honor is hereby pledged to keep it. The Indians desire peace, and they now pledge their honor to keep it

      Coming from my I-Search Plan and UnEssay project, I found this article extremely ironic as Native American took treaties extremely seriously and respect the treaties. They were even willing to participate in battles which do not belong to them as uphold to the treaties. However, the government has designed policies to violate the treaties that they signed. Given this first article, I find it extremely ironic.

    1. Native activists and service providers in attendance were outraged by the BIA’s testimony.

      If I were part of the Native American community at the time, I tool will feel anger and outraged by the BIA's testimony. I think this violates the original purpose of forming the BIA

    1. Slavery also was an important marker of “civilization” in the South. Benjamin Hawkins, the federal Indian agent for the South from 1796 to 1816, lived among the Creeks and ran a model plantation staffed by several dozen slaves. He demonstrated how to farm various crops, made and repaired tools, and offered instructions on how to efficiently manage a slave labor force. [3]

      This is one of the most ironic statement I've seen. During colonial era, most colonizer consider them as saviors who brought civilization and culture to native population. I think this statement is no different from those claiming colonization brought prosperity and development to colonies.

    1. The election specifically asked voters whether to amend the Cherokee Nation’s constitution to limit citi-zenship to those who can trace their heritage to the “Cherokee by Blood” Rolls,

      Yeah, totally agree to another annotation, why would they want to limit the citizenship to those who can trace their heritage to the "Cherokee by Blood"

    1. Post-Civil War division of Indian territory, Oklahoma

      It's actually odd to see "NO MAN'S LAND" in this image. I am not sure if there is truly no inhabitants due to environmental conditions, but in my opinion this is probably another time that the government has viewed Lands owned by certain communities which it does not recognized as "NO MAN'S LAND"

    1. The long and narrow room was filled with tables and folding chairs facing the single table reserved for the commissioners at the front of the room.

      I could imagine a small room crowded by people desperately awaiting for the meeting.

    1. ted agreeably to the provisions of the said treaty, and any surplus which may remain after removal and payment of the claims so ascertained shall be turned over and belong to the education fund.

      According to another annotation, this six hundred thousand dollars worth roughly seventeen million today, but is it truly enough to cover all the expenses of movements including building education system.

    1. ICERR Pamphlet, Source: Alexandra Harmon, Rich Indians

      I think this image shows the fear of surrounding neighborhoods of an empowered Native American economy.

    1. In order to prevent the dam’s construction, the Seneca Nation waged a legal battle. During their testimony to the House of Representatives Committee on Appropriations in April 1957, the Army Corps of Engineers justified the project, in part, because of its “good cost-benefit ratio”

      It's always heart breaking to hear few sacrifices for the benefits of the majority.

    1. The United States agrees, at its own proper expense, to construct, at some place on the Missouri river, near the centre of said reservation where timber and water may be convenient, the following buildings, to wit, a warehouse, a store-room for the use of the agent in storing goods belonging to the Indians, to cost not less than $2,500; an agency building, for the residence of the agent, to cost not exceeding $3,000; a residence for the physician, to cost not more than $3,000; and five other buildings, for a carpenter, farmer, blacksmith, miller, and engineer-each to cost not exceeding $2,000; also, a school-house, or mission building, so soon as a sufficient number of children can be induced by the agent to attend school, which shall not cost exceeding $5,000.

      If this promise can be done properly, I think it's going to change Native American's lives. However, based on what we have studied this quarter. I think it is not the case.

  2. Nov 2020
    1. This mother . . . Theseare the nicest people in the world. I mean, there are wayworse people in theworld than this family. This mother says, ‘So. You’re Indian! Tell us all about it.’“I looked at her and I didn’t say anything, ’cause I didn’t really know whatto say. She says, ‘See dear, you tell us all about it now, then we don’t have tobring it up again all weekend.’

      I can imagine this situation for a native American being questioned and viewed differently simply because of her identity.

    1. Neither the United States nor the Indian tribes were able to control the actions of their subjects, as aggressive white settlers moved illegally into lands reserved for the Indians and as young Indian warriors continued their raids on white settlements after the chiefs had agreed to permanent peace. On the side of the whites the governmental system contributed to the problem, for trea-ties negotiated and signed in good faith by the executive branch were delayed, amended, or rejected by the Senate, and Congress was often slow or negligent in appropriating the funds needed to implement the treaties. But it is not proper to maintain, as some Indian groups have done, that an initial treaty is absolute and that any subsequent treaty, agreement, or statute that changes its provisions is an illegal abrogation of the original treaty.6

      Yeah, totally agree with another annotation. We usually undermine these settlers who constantly break the treaties and increase the tension between the US and native American tribes.

    1. AreassupposedlycededbyIndiansinthe1851-52treaties(blankareas)andareasintendedtobereserved(hachuredareas).Treatydesignations(A-Q)arethoseusedbythePresidentin1852.(AfterRoyce1899:Pi.CXIV).

      This is ridiculous. I can't imagine if someone take this big piece of land from my people. I don't even think we have this much land to be taken

    1. The takeover began November 20, 1969. Media coverage materialized immediately. Protestors occupied the island for nineteen months, until the last occupiers were removed on June 11, 1971.

      Wow. I am shocked by their perseverance and the will to continue the protest.

    1. As a reminder, under allotment, when the President deemed a tribe “ready,” their reservation could be split into individual allotments or homesteads. These allotments would be exempt from taxation and ineligible for sale for 25 years. After the period of 25 years, the trust restriction would be lifted and the Indian allottee would become the owner of the land in fee. In addition, any “surplus” land could be sold off to white settlers.

      This sounds like a great soil for illegal business to exploit. I could image settlers that might exploit this policy and gain great advantage from tribal lands.

    1. Kiowa men’s roles were greatly altered as a result of the reservation system. Hunting and procuring through raiding were coming to an end. Men continued to hunt and exchange hides with local traders for manufactured goods and to reduce debts, but the robe and fur trade had collapsed, falling from $70,400 in 1876 to $5,068 in 1879. In the waning years of the buffalo business, Indians benefited less and less while American hunters and merchants wrung the last of the profits out of the robe trade.

      I think economic superiority is scarier than military or technological superiority which can slowly consumes and "defeat" cultures and populations with a weaker positions. It shows how tribal hunters can slowly be turned into a labor within the entire capitalism machine.

    1. In consideration of the advantages conferred by this supplementary treaty upon the the Apache tribe of Indians, they agree to observe and faithfully comply with all the stipulations and agreements entered into by the Kiowas and Comanches in said original treaty. They agree, in the same manner, to keep the peace toward the whites and all other persons under the jurisdiction of the United States, and to do and perform all other things enjoined upon said tribes by the provisions of said treaty; and they hereby give up and forever relinquish to the United States all rights, privileges, and grants now vested in them, or intended to be transferred to them, by the treaty between the United States and the Cheyenne and Arapahoe tribes of Indians, concluded at the camp on the Little Arkansas River, in the State of Kansas, on the fourteenth day of October, one thousand eight hundred and sixty-five, and also by the supplementary treaty, concluded at the same place on the seventeenth day of the same month, between the United States, of the one part, and the Cheyenne, Arapahoe, and Apache tribes, of the other part.

      Article 4 is interesting to me as it shows in what ways Indian tribes sign treaties with American. I am fascinated by this fact which I never new about.