14 Matching Annotations
  1. Apr 2016
    1. ancient concepts

      hmm plutarch is funny in this context because romanLife+greekLanguage :) but we should definitely have a latin words doc (like norman's greek words doc) with: virtus, senatus, rex, potestas, imperium, auctoritas, jus, pater..?

    1. I want to pick something as topical as possible. One example: Jill Lepore's "The Sovereignty of Women".

      nice essay!..note how the examples of pathological treatments of women-as-leaders are english :) [the middle english 'purity/cleanness/hygiene' tradition is relevant here too of course] but obviously queen victoria is the toweringly missing figure here..!

    1. measures your implicit bias for or against women in leadership positions

      one caveat that might be worth noting depending on how deeply gender-theoretic we want to go: roman political and military leadership may be more intensely gendered, and especially more connected with survival via violence, than modern american political and business leadership (plenty of modern corporations do see their male leaders as 'paterfamilias' but plenty do not; in the united states, legal prioritization of the father or husband varies significantly by state (i think this correlates with first european colonists -- iirc first-spanish areas like texas give women significantly better consideration in e.g. divorce cases than in first-english areas) but in general american fathers do not have the authority over household life and death that roman fathers did)

    2. advantages and problems of the survey's methodology

      opportunity to encourage students to notice implicit associations as they read these texts -- more likely to notice when an association suggested by plutarch seems unfamiliar, so if you don't notice anything then maybe you and plutarch share the same implicit biases!

    1. playing the gender card" to strengthen their position as a leader

      for leaders' goffmanian self-presentation, diffs between late-republican roman and modern american 'power' clothing differentiation by gender seem significant..philip rieff has a great (albeit very old) article on the political semiotics of business suits that i can't find at the moment but will dig for a bit

      (in general stuff about gendering of the leader's self-presented body might connect with the 'vistas' point ulrike made in slack)

    2. Heracles and Dionysus

      can we trace paradigm-figures throughout our modules? maybe 'heraclean' and 'dionysian' and 'jasonian' and 'agamemnonian and 'achillean' and 'odyssean' and 'caesarian' etc. are all 'leader paradigm' tags?

    3. East-West, Greek-Roman, Reason-Passion

      these are huge issues that should be raised in other leadersip modules too :)

      east-west and reason-passion constantly recur in modern leadership studies too (to say nothing of kissinger books and trump speeches)..often with little conceptual sophistication but tons more data, as far as i've seen..for earlier examples see 18th-century jesuit-dominican fights re. missionary approach to chinese government and ritual

    4. in the immediate context

      might be especially interesting to look for stories unique to plutarch (so more likely to be fabricated or selected-from-obscure-sources for the sake of gender-heavy characterization)