8 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2021
    1. ncrease and thereby absorb the extra carbon from the atmosphere? Recent studies suggest that natural processes may slow the rate of increase of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, but it is doubtful that either the earth's oceans or its forests can absorb the entirety of the extra carbon released by human activity (Falkowski et al. 2000).

      It would be interesting to see how these different organisms cope with increased carbon emissions and how their multiplication would affect their ecosystems.

    1. Species richness and species evenness are probably the most frequently used measures of the total biodiversity of a region. Species diversity is also described in terms of the phylogenetic diversity, or evolutionary relatedness, of the species present in an area. For example, some areas may be rich in closely related taxa, having evolved from a common ancestor that was also found in that same area, whereas other areas may have an array of less closely related species descended from different ancestors (see further comments in the section on Species diversity as a surrogate for global biodiversity)

      This may be missing the point but in general do ecologists value diversity from one common ancestor vs many one of the other?

    1. No Perfect Organism

      Excuse me anomalocaris existed and is very offended by this statement! Though in all seriousness this probably seems obvious at least for me I feel like I can get into the trap of thinking that all organisms are perfect how they and don't consider how there imperfections drive evolution.

    1. Fecundity Selection Certain phenotypes (thus genotypes) may make a disproportionate contribution to the gene pool of the next generation by producing a disproportionate number of young. Such fecundity selection is another way of describing another criterion of fitness described by Darwin: family size. In each of these examples of natural selection, certain phenotypes are better able than others to contribute their genes to the next generation. Thus, by Darwin's standards, they are more fit. The outcome is a gradual change in the gene frequencies in that population.

      This may be silly to ask but if an increase in fecundity some how lead to a deacres in fitness would that mean that they could cancel each other our without anyone even knowing ?

    1. In short, organisms must be able to reproduce with each other to pass new traits to offspring.

      If 2 animals that looked entirely different and behaved differently were able to reperduce fertile offspring would they still be one species?

    1. The Grants found changes from one generation to the next in the distribution of beak shapes with the medium ground finch on the Galápagos island of Daphne Major. The birds have inherited variation in the bill shape with some birds having wide deep bills and others having thinner bills. During a period in which rainfall was higher than normal because of an El Niño, the large hard seeds that large-billed birds ate were reduced in number; however, there was an abundance of the small soft seeds which the small-billed birds ate. Therefore, survival and reproduction were much better in the following years for the small-billed birds. In the years following this El Niño, the Grants measured beak sizes in the population and found that the average bill size was smaller. Since bill size is an inherited trait, parents with smaller bills had more offspring and the size of bills had evolved to be smaller. As conditions improved in 1987 and larger seeds became more available, the trend toward smaller average bill size ceased.

      I always found it fascinating how natural selection can be observed in essentially real time. It doesn't only take millions of years and can happen over one lifetime.

    1. From its early days, ecology has been in part a theoretical– mathematical science

      After reading this it is interesting how mathematical ecology really is especially against sciences that I would have considered more mathy.