15 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2020
    1. Political revolutions, for example, take place when an old order breaks down and this happens when enough people no longer feel compelled to follow the rules of the old authorities, when the old authorities no longer seem legitimate

      This correlates extremely well with this current year and the social/political movements initiated. People disagree with the people in power and how previous orders have been carried out ( police brutality). These orders lose their legitimacy when its putting the public in harm and "ethically wrong" and riots and movements towards change occur.

  2. Sep 2020
    1. If we help others we are undermining competition and all of the good that competition produces
      • This sounds so cut-throat and dog-eat-dog, but I understand realistically this is how ethical egoism is perceived. Lending out help to someone puts you at a disadvantage, so don't do it.
    1. Perhaps this person feels guilty for having as much money as she has and decides that the best way to make herself feel better is to give a large anonymous donation to a charity.

      I feel as though this is very common. Guilting ourselves in to doing something for others because your life and its blessings are so different in comparison and its unfair, sad or rude to flaunt it to others. Part of this is just apart of our social classes and government( but that's a different story). So are we doing this volunteer and charitable work because its the kind and right thing to do or because it'll help us sleep better at night knowing people will take your gifts?

    1. self-serving and so ethics is impossible

      I always say you cant help others until you help yourself. If you're not mentally healthy and well how are you suppose to support others and successfully complete tasks. We'd be moving through life like zombies. The originally intention might not be to our benefit but for some people the satisfaction of helping others makes them feel more confident in their character.

    1. Whatever is unnatural is wrong.

      I observe this in our world today through societal norms including "normal" looks and perceptions. Examples of these are hair color, piercings and tattoos. These material things are not natural and are perceived as bad and an image is painted prior to evaluating the persons character or work ethic.

    1. In this case what is right is right and what is wrong is wrong, because God says so. On the other hand, we can listen to the commands because they are commands telling us to do what is right. That is, God would be commanding us to do something because it is right.

      i think about this often. Am I making this decision to prevent a poor one later down the road, is this a mistake made on purpose? Rattles me how I'm still not completely sure where my own thoughts and beliefs are coming from and this section really puts everything into question.

    1. All of these commands cannot simultaneously be absolutely binding on us, unless we opt for mandatory three day weekends (not necessarily a bad thing)

      I find this interesting. As asked in the first sentence of this section, how can we be sure this is truly the word and commands of these religious leaders? Which one is to be followed or morally correct over the other? This causes many issues within our world today.

    1. claims must be opinions, since they are clearly not factual claims

      This blurb takes me back to the start of the chapter where it asked " what happens when ethics, law and religion conflict"? I have a similar belief or theory to my personal religious beliefs. Although I do not practice or follow a certain religion I do believe of someone or something in a higher power and that there is a deeper reason behind why things exist and why I am made the way i am. So my question is, when practicing a religion and following either scripture or a book like the bible for instance, how do you know its the actual words of whomever it claims? Are they supported facts or just their thoughts and opinions jotted down and why do we follow it and give it so much power? just a thought that pop into my head time to time.

    1. The problem here is that we cannot just assume that the conclusion is true, as someone who uses this way of argument is in fact doing.

      My questions is, what do you do in a situation in which a fallacy like this is used and you are unsure of the conclusion they are stating is true? Do you question and persuade the opposite direction based on the intention of the discussion or do you assume like this example that conclusion is accurate?

    1. This one is really no joke – in fact the whole of the current scare about childhood vaccinations and autism was “established” by a single study of twelve children! The fact that the paper was retracted, and its author was barred from medical practice didn’t matter since its influence only grew since the date of its publication.

      the influence that not only this fallacy but other styles hold on how we win/lose agreements, develop and support our opinions and live our daily routines is tremendous. This specific topic is something I hear often in multiple formats or styles relating to vaccines, x-ray exposure and systemic fluoride specifically in my dental field. It just takes one domino....

    1. They work so well in getting us to buy into their conclusions in part because of the nature of the human mind – even though we are capable of thinking about things coolly and logically, we often jump to conclusions on emotional grounds and then enlist our cognitive abilities merely to rationalize decisions and conclusions we have already made.

      This stuck out to me personally as an identifier for anxiety disorders. We are fully capable of making decisions and dealing with stress but instead jump around from outcome to outcome and make assumptions based off what we have already established in our minds, even if it doesn't exist.

  3. Aug 2020
    1. This is both its strength and its weakness.

      This statement right here is exactly what everyone should remember in every aspect of life. Your thoughts, feelings and emotions although they matter and are important, also strike as a weakness and can be turned against you. Allowing your self to take a step back and grow thick skin will aid in admitting our strengths, weaknesses, faults, etc. This in turn will foster more meaningful and effective conversations and "arguments".

    1. iving through a natural disaster or a war

      Life before and after the COVID-19 pandemic will for many be drastically different in terms of careers, family. education, healthcare, politics, etc. Do we sit here and anticipate and advocate for change to come or assume it'll happen naturally and do nothing?

    1. Not doing this is like sleepwalking through life.

      This ties into practicing mindfulness quiet seamlessly. Discovering what our aspirations and morals are and then practicing doing things with intent and being fluid with life changes is crucial to overall happiness and success. No one wants to sleepwalk through life and miss everything do to lack of intent of interest. Love this metaphor!

    1. Animal nervous systems are the product of hundreds of millions of years of evolution, and are extremely useful for helping animals survive and flourish in a complex and constantly changing environment

      This reminds me of the intertwining of biology and natural selection with philosophical ideas and beliefs. The changing of our behaviors and habits form deeper due to our decisions and normative questions as discussed later on in this section. It just makes me think how differently biology would be perceived if we learned this side of the story in addition to the science!