2 Matching Annotations
  1. Apr 2026
    1. Key figure: Ayn Rand [b85], 1900s America Ayn Rand is sometimes popular with tech people and CEOs. Understandably, some CEOs view themselves as brilliant and like being told that ruthlessly pursuing their ambition is morally good. (Though the end-goal can’t be great feats of engineering, that self-interest must come first and great feats of engineering can only be a side-effect).

      I think this section is a little dismissive just saying CEOs like egoism because it justifies their selfishness doesn't actually argue against it. If this chapter is trying to get us to think unbiased about ethics, it should probably engage with her actual argument before writing it off. It feels like the authors already decided egoism is wrong and didn't bother making the case.

    2. Consequentialism# Sources [b46] [b47] Actions are judged on the sum total of their consequences (utility calculus) The ends justify the means. Utilitarianism: “It is the greatest happiness of the greatest number that is the measure of right and wrong.” That is, What is moral is to do what makes the

      A framework missing here is Contractualism the idea that an action is right if everyone would agree to it without knowing their role in society. This is different from consequentialism because it's not just about the best outcome, it's about what's fair to everyone involved. It feels really applicable to social media would you agree to how Instagram's algorithm works if you didn't know whether you'd be a regular user or a teenager being pushed diet content?