34 Matching Annotations
  1. Nov 2020
    1. “stereotypical understandings of women as sexually harmless,” even as ongoing “heterosexism can render lesbian and bisexual victims of female-perpetrated sexual victimization invisible to professionals.”

      A lot of the statements about previous laws and definitions are similar. They tend to exclude certain groups because they simply think that not all people are capable of sexual violence. Everyone is capable of this and as a society, we need to see the big picture. We need to stop leaving things out because we don't want to believe it.

    2. The inquiry was a timely one. For years, the FBI definition of rape was gendered, requiring “carnal knowledge of a female forcibly and against her will.”

      Looking at old laws and definitions is sometimes confusing. To think that these people were excluding men as if it couldn't happen to them as well. Societal views on gender need to change. because thinking like that is dangerous and offensive.

    3. 38 percent of victims were men––a figure much higher than in prior surveys. Intrigued, she began to investigate: Was sexual violence against men more common than previously thought?

      It is interesting that they would ask that question. I have so many mixed opinions about this topic. Without drawing attention away from either side, just because it more often happens to women does not mean that it doesn't happen to men. I know that's not what she is saying but not all sexual violence is reported and recorded. We can't always just look at data and statistics.

    1. Black people were often treated predominantly by white doctors, who didn’t always provide equal care. Black hospitals were understaffed and had very few resources, resulting in preventable deaths. The unequal treatment black Americans received in the 1960s has continued into the 21st century.

      The fact that people were unable to see that we are all the same is crazy. What is even worse is that society today is still racist and unfair for absolutely no reason. How can people think like that?

    2. Sims developed the vaginal speculum as well as a technique to repair a common complication from childbirth. In fact, according to Ojanuga’s paper, Sims operated on one woman 13 times without anesthesia to perfect the repair of fistulas. He did get the surgery right, but few benefited from the brutal experimentation on black women — Sims didn’t seem to use anesthesia for any of his patients, black or white, and most, obviously, couldn’t deal with the pain.

      Sim's definitely made progress in his research and has accomplished something but this is clearly wrong and could have done so many other ways. There are so many parts of this that are disturbing and wrong. Operating on someone without their consent, surgery without pain relief, picking specific people to operate on because of their race...

    3. violating one set of people for the benefit of another

      Grouping people and treating them differently for such a minor detail Is so wrong. The fact that people were/still are willing to commit acts like this is concerning. There are so many other ways society could have gone about this. This was completely unfair and brought harm to so many people for research that could have been done under better terms.

  2. Oct 2020
    1. Nate comforted me the best he could and it didn't bother me until I had sex again years later.

      This is very challenging to go through and can haunt you for days, months, years, or even the rest of your life. It is no nice to see that in the end, he is able to enjoy his sex life. Maybe the woman wasn't seeing that what she was doing was wrong because she was intoxicated. This does not make it right or give her an excuse. Everybody needs to more aware about the rules of consent and respect others bodily autonomy to avoid situations like this in the future.

    1. Starting in middle school, students might hear about sex and relationships from their peers, or from the internet.

      I agree that it is dangerous for these students to get false ideas about sex and consent especially in middle school. In some middle schools, health and sex education courses are required. When I had to take these courses, I don't think consent was mentioned even once. I don't think it was even mentioned in my high school courses. I think we need to bring more attention to the idea of consent and start explicitly stating what it is and what its about at a younger age.

    2. (“I don’t think I’ve ever used the word ‘consent’ with a three-year-old before,” Kahn says.) The goal is that “if a kid doesn’t want to be hugged by another kid, he can say, ‘This is my body,’ and be understood.”

      Most of us as humans grow up being taught to respect personal space. Gideon Kahn says that he doesn't think that he's ever used the word consent when teaching young children. I think it's important to start using that word and teaching children at younger age. It may be hard for some of the kids to understand but it still needs to be a conversation. We should all start learning at a younger age so we can realize the full extent of consent before reaching the age where kids start to develop a sex drive. Without this understanding, you may unintentionally hurt somebody by not respecting their space.

    3. But at its core, it’s an idea that many learn as early as preschool — the notion that we should respect one another’s boundaries, in order to be safe, preserve dignity, and build healthy relationships.

      Lots of this behavior is taught as kid, but not every parent is teaching it. There are many kids/adults our age this still do not fully understand boundaries and are very immature. Consent is a huge boundary that many still do not fully understand. Ive never learned anything about consent until this class (consenting adults) in my first year of college. Not many people understand how important consent is and it should not be assumed that people understand at an early age when there are still adults that do not have a full understanding of it.

  3. Sep 2020
    1. Poor life experiences lead to limited knowledge of the body, sexuality and sexualexpression

      Poor life and or sexual experiences can definitely change the way you express yourself and your understanding of the body. These experiences can change your view points on the human body and sex for long periods of time or maybe even permanently.

    2. Without a means of communication, it is very difficult to convey your needs anddesires, and this leads to alienation and exclusion.

      Affective communication and understanding is needed for sexual interaction.

    3. By denying individuals with intellectual disability the opportunity to learn abouttheir sexuality and develop social relationships with others, society has denied themthe right to self-fulfilment.

      I almost agree with this. It definitely depends on the disability and each individual situation. People that are able to understand all aspects of sex should not be denied this. It may not seem fair but for somebody who can not grasp topics like that, they should not be able to make that decision in my opinion.

    1. Christian denies that the power imbalances between himself and Ana have any impact on her ability to freely consent.

      I disagree with Christian. Someone like him can very intimidating. He's really rich and controlling which definitely puts Ana at a disadvantage.

    2. Ana rarely communicates any desires of her own, but rather Christian orchestrates their scenes completely. This reproduces common myths around men's natural sexual needs and women's lack of them

      I feel like this situation is a little bit different with Ana being a virgin and all. I don't think Christian falls under this stereotype because knows exactly what he wants and And has no idea. Therefore it would make sense that he orchestrates all or most of their sexual interactions.

    3. At the same time, BDSM communities themselves have undergone an interrogation of such previously accepted understandings of consent. A number of prominent BDSM bloggers (such as Kitty Stryker, 2011a-c; Clarisse Thorn, 2011; and Pepper Mint, 2007a) have written openly about non-consensual behaviour within BDSM communities, questioning the previously accepted line that 'BDSM is not (ever) abuse'.

      If they have admitted to engaging in nonconsensual behaviors then they are now allowed to claim that BDSM is never abusive.

    1. A note from the Harvard Law Review (1986) observes that‘in the context of maritalrape...a woman’s right to bodily integrity (individual security) confronts a man’s rightto marital privacy (freedom from state intrusion)

      we're an inherently sexist country

    2. peers consider them to be less responsible anddesirable, often labeling them‘sluts.’For men/boys, on the other hand, there is no com-parable negative categorization

      This seems to be the issue with many topics relating to sex. Women are more harshly judged then men most of the time.

    3. They do not merely represent us but alsoembodyus. This is would explain why so many victims of non-consensual pornographyliken it to sexual assault or rape (Fink & Segall,2016; Juliett,2017).

      that's an interesting perspective I never thought of it like this.

    1. Thesearticles advise that a safer way to sext is to create pictures in which one’s fragmentedbody parts are de-personalized.

      it's unfortunate that these articles must specifically address this and give advice on how to not be exposed and humiliated when men can send their parts to whoever, whenever

    2. One reason may be that most of the make-believe nonconsensual sexual encoun-ters in the general tips relied on physical proximity and contact—with sexting, such scen-arios would need to be enacted through speech, such as a prenegotiated pretend resistanceto sexting or a threat to distribute private photos that is understood to befictional.

      online sexual harassment is very real and should definitely be talked about

    3. As Harris points out, a simplistic transmission model of sexual communi-cation assumes that a clear“yes”or“no”is sufficient; the problem with this model isthat it fails to account for the cultural and social systems that underlie all interpersonalcommunication.

      I completely agree I don't think a simple 'yes' or 'no' is enough because there is so much that leads up to sex and there might be many reasons why someone feels they need to say yes other than wanting to

    1. In particu-lar, online resources aimed at teenagers cover consent in quite a lot of depth and nuance, discussing factors such as drugs and alcohol, social pressures, the relationship- maintenance approach as a kind of pressure, and young people’s concerns about appearing immature or juvenile if they do not engage in sex.

      These messages and lessons given to youth about consent can be contradicting or confusing because they are given all these warning signs but also encouraged to go out and explore

    2. In these ways, it puts images young people may have seen in pornography in the context of real- life sexual experiences and possibilities.

      making it not just something to immediately demonize, but just another possible experience to have and talk about as you would normal sex

    3. Many of these producers em-phasize representation of diverse bodies (in terms, for in-stance, of race, body type, or disability), different genders (including non-binary ones), sexualities, sexual practices beyond the dominant sexual script, consent, and safer sex practices. They have a strong focus on ethics in both what they choose to depict and in their production processes.

      this is very interesting, I wasn't aware of that at all

    1. Some men report feeling pres-sured by these constructions of masculinity and ideas of the male sexual drive to always consent to, or even initiate sex, even if they do not want it or would prefer a different kind of bond and experience.

      It's interesting how society makes men believe that they must always be sexually active

    2. o, if we consensually engage in sex we do not want due to the social pressures of the permissive discourse and dominant ideas about self- improvement, then we have no one else to blame but ourselves

      I disagree with this. Being socially pressured is not the fault of the victim

    1. It may also be tempting to think that if you have done a particular sexual act with a long-term partner once, or even many times, they will be up for it again.

      Consent is important every time any type of sexual act occurs. It should not just be the first or second time. Something that could be comfortable for somebody today might not be tomorrow depending on location, mood, mindset, and many other variables.

    2. what we are negotiating,

      It's extremely important to know that sex is not the only thing that requires consent. Any sexual act between two people should contain two consenting parties.

  4. Aug 2020
    1. Much like rape culture, the law also does not affect everyone equally, and marginalized groups are structur-ally disadvantaged by the law—the legislation itself and the ways in which it is enforced. I

      A majority of people also think that men aren't "rapable" as well

    2. Legal definitions of rape and consent reflect and re-inforce cultural attitudes and beliefs, and can have a significant impact on how we think about sex.

      This helps explain why US law tends to not believe women in rape and assault cases.

    3. Laws evolve over time, are reinterpreted by the courts, and lawmaking generally involves compromise, which in turn leads to some interesting inconsistencies. Marriage laws for instance tend to view sex—specifically, penile-vaginal intercourse

      What does this mean for same-gender sexual offenses? How does the law address sexual assault between two men or two women?