9 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2020
    1. What enabling knowledge (facts, concepts, principles) and skills (processes, procedures, strategies) will students need in order to perform effectively and achieve desired results? What activities will equip students with the needed knowledge and skills? What will need to be taught and coached, and how should it best be taught, in light of performance goals? What materials and resources are best suited to accomplish these goals? Leverage the various instructional strategies listed below: Large and/or group discussion Interactive lecturing and think-pair-shares Flipped classroom Cooperative learning (including team-based and project-based learning) Guided note-taking Guided inquiry for problem-solving

      Instructional Strategies I can use to promote a high-order level of thinking. What is an example of guided inquiry for problem-solving look like in a math class?(need to look this up) Need to think of ways to have small. group interactions, this seems to really help students. Coach approach to teaching promotes critical thinking (tied to Common Core)

    2. Therefore, they will have a clearer vision of what evidence students can provide to show they have achieved or have started to attain the goals of the course. Consider the following two questions at this stage: How will I know if students have achieved the desired results? What will I accept as evidence of student understanding and proficiency? At this stage it is important to consider a wide range of assessment methods in order to ensure that students are being assess over the goals the instructor wants students to attain. Sometimes, the assessments do not match the learning goals, and it becomes a frustrating experience for students and instructors. Use the list below to help brainstorm assessment methods for the learning goals of the course. Term papers. Short-answer quizzes. Free-response questions. Homework assignments. Lab projects. Practice problems. Group projects. Among many others…

      STAGE 2: Determine Acceptable Evidence I shouldn't just think of one way tp asses student's understanding. This would give me better insight as to how student's are understanding the material.

    3. What should participants hear, read, view, explore or otherwise encounter? This knowledge is considered knowledge worth being familiar with. Information that fits within this question is the lowest priority content information that will be mentioned in the lesson, unit, or course. What knowledge and skills should participants master? The knowledge and skills at this substage are considered important to know and do. The information that fits within this question could be the facts, concepts, principles, processes, strategies, and methods students should know when they leave the course. What are big ideas and important understandings participants should retain? The big ideas and important understandings are referred to as enduring understandings because these are the ideas that instructors want students to remember sometime after they’ve completed the course.

      STAGE 1: These are the questions I should ask myself when identifying desired results.

      1. hear, read, view, explore/encounter
      2. knowledge students leave with
      3. retention
    4. In teaching students for understanding, we must grasp the key idea that we are coaches of their ability to play the ‘game’ of performing with understanding, not tellers of our understanding to them on the sidelines.”

      As teachers we need to always keep in mind that not everyone thinks the same way or that they have the same approach. As we embrace our student's differences we will promote diversity in our classrooms.

    5. If the teacher has explicitly defined the learning goals of the course, then they have a better idea of what they want the students to get out of learning activities. Furthermore, if done thoroughly, it eliminates the possibility of doing certain activities and tasks for the sake of doing them. Every task and piece of instruction has a purpose that fits in with the overarching goals and goals of the course.

      I need to remember that every activity or assessment needs to be intentional and that students aren't just doing useless activities.

    6. Therefore, backward design is an effective way of providing guidance for instruction and designing lessons, units, and courses. Once the learning goals, or desired results, have been identified, instructors will have an easier time developing assessments and instruction around grounded learning outcomes.

      Backward design will come in very handy, especially since we need to be promoting higher-order thinking in our students.

    7. Therefore, it can be stated that teachers often focus more on teaching rather than learning. This perspective can lead to the misconception that learning is the activity when, in fact, learning is derived from a careful consideration of the meaning of the activity.

      It is easy for teachers to be focused on teaching rather than having students learn. I need to keep this in mind when creating lessons in the future.

    8. Wiggins and McTighe argue that backward design is focused primarily on student learning and understanding.

      I think that this should be the focus of every lesson, unfortunately sometimes we may fall short on student's understanding.

    9. backward design is considered a much more intentional approach to course design than traditional methods of design.

      I think that this kind of lesson approach will help me be more clear in what I want students to learn. I remember when I took another ESDC class that asked me to create a lesson and I started with a "forward approach," it was very difficult for me to create the lesson. This approach makes more sense because as the quote says everything you do is more "intentional."