35 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. Jourdon Anderson Writes His Former Enslaver, 1865

      To conclude, his old master didn't seem to treat him and his father that well at all, but he kept reeling him back in with empty promises of being better. I do wonder if he actually did respond and agree to these requirements because from his history with Jourdon, I highly doubt he did agree.

    2. In answering this letter, please state if there would be any safety for my Milly and Jane, who are now grown up, and both good-looking girls. You know how it was with poor Matilda and Catherine. I would rather stay here and starve—and die, if it come to that—than have my girls brought to shame by the violence and wickedness of their young masters. You will also please state if there has been any schools opened for the colored children in your neighborhood. The great desire of my life now is to give my children an education, and have them form virtuous habits.

      What happened to Matilda and Catherine? Does he mean they were assaulted? Who are these women? I know he means that his children have grown up and are beautiful so he wants to make sure they are protected and safe from that type of event happening.

    3. Dayton, Ohio. If you fail to pay us for faithful labors in the past, we can have little faith in your promises in the future. We trust the good Maker has opened your eyes to the wrongs which you and your fathers have done to me and my fathers, in making us toil for you for generations without recompense. Here I draw my wages every Saturday night; but in Tennessee there was never any pay-day for the negroes any more than for the horses and cows. Surely there will be a day of reckoning for those who defraud the laborer of his hire.

      This must feel like a very important moment in his life reminding his old master of his actions towards his father and his masters father. Holding him accountable for his actions.

    4. As to my freedom, which you say I can have, there is nothing to be gained on that score, as I got my free papers in 1864 from the Provost-Marshal-General of the Department of Nashville. Mandy says she would be afraid to go back without some proof that you were disposed to treat us justly and kindly; and we have concluded to test your sincerity by asking you to send us our wages for the time we served you. This will make us forget and forgive old scores, and rely on your justice and friendship in the future. I served you faithfully for thirty-two years, and Mandy twenty years. At twenty-five dollars a month for me, and two dollars a week for Mandy, our earnings would amount to eleven thousand six hundred and eighty dollars. Add to this the interest for the time our wages have been kept back, and deduct what you paid for our clothing, and three doctor’s visits to me, and pulling a tooth for Mandy, and the balance will show what we are in justice entitled to. Please send the money by Adams’s Express, in care of V. Winters, Esq.,

      I feel that he should just stay where he is. The money would be a big reason way they would move but I feel as though it just wont happen. He will still be be treated unjustly just as Mandy says he was. They were asking for quite a bit which would be harder to accommodate rather than just finding someone else to do it.

    5. I want to know particularly what the good chance is you propose to give me. I am doing tolerably well here. I get twenty-five dollars a month, with victuals and clothing; have a comfortable home for Mandy,—the folks call her Mrs. Anderson,—and the children—Milly, Jane, and Grundy—go to school and are learning well. The teacher says Grundy has a head for a preacher. They go to Sunday school, and Mandy and me attend church regularly. We are kindly treated. Sometimes we overhear others saying, “Them colored people were slaves” down in Tennessee. The children feel hurt when they hear such remarks; but I tell them it was no disgrace in Tennessee to belong to Colonel Anderson. Many darkeys would have been proud, as I used to be, to call you master. Now if you will write and say what wages you will give me, I will be better able to decide whether it would be to my advantage to move back again.

      He seems to be doing very well where he is, and he isnt being shot at. I couldnt imagine why he would move back to his old master after finally getting better conditions for him and his family.

    6. Although you shot at me twice before I left you, I did not want to hear of your being hurt, and am glad you are still living.

      why would his old master claim to give Jourdon a better life yet shoot at him twice when he left? He must have had the intention of killing him? Why is Jourdon so okay with it as well and still wishes him well?

    7. I have often felt uneasy about you. I thought the Yankees would have hung you long before this, for harboring Rebs they found at your house.

      Why did he feel uneasy about P.H. Anderson? The probability of him being killed or how he treated him while he was working for him?

    8. Black Americans hoped that the end of the Civil War would create an entirely new world, while white southerners tried to restore the antebellum order as much as they could. Most former enslavers sought to maintain control over their laborers through sharecropping contracts. P.H. Anderson of Tennessee was one such former enslaver. After the war, he contacted his former enslaved laborer Jourdon Anderson, offering him a job opportunity. The following is Jourdon Anderson’s reply.

      Why is he contacting his old laborer to come to work for him again? Why couldn't he just find someone else to do it? was it getting to the point where it was past the time of getting more help?

    1. My honorable discharge from the service dated on that day, although it is worn and not very legible now, as you can see, is one of my most prized possessions. Some years ago a man from the government service in Washington made out for me in a detailed form a record of my war service. It is in much more complete form than I have set it down here, but I think such details are of more interest to one’s family than to the general public. My life since the war has been the ordinary life of the average man of my race. I have not so many accomplishments to boast of, but I have done the best I could to prove myself worthy of being a free man.

      How did his story end? Did he own any businesses or have anything else to put towards his title? Was he able to live comfortably? Or was he able to live above his means? either way, he definitely proved himself worthy to be free even though he didn't need to. As soon as a person is born they should have been free, dont have to prove it.

    2. On January 1, 1863, he signed the Emancipation Proclamation, which made me and all the rest of my race free. We could not be bought and sold any more or whipped or made to work without pay. We were not to be treated as things without souls any more, but as human beings. Of course I do not remember that I thought it all out in this way when I learned what President Lincoln had done. I am sure I did not. And the men in my regiment did not. I had gone back to Newbern then. The thing we expected was that we would be taken into the federal service at once. It was not until May 28, 1863, however, that the thing we had hoped for so long came to pass, when Colonel James C. Beecher, a brother of Henry Ward Beecher, that great champion of our race, came and took command of the regiment. I was appointed Sergeant of Company G, being the first colored man to be accepted into the federal service and the only colored man that furnished the government a thousand men in the Civil War. The regiment was at first called the First North Carolina Colored Regiment. It later became known as the 35th Regiment, United States Colored troops. Soon afterwards we were armed and equipped and shipped to South Carolina and stationed at Charleston Harbor. From that time until June, 1866, when we were mustered out at Charleston, South Carolina, I was in active service, ranking as First Sergeant, Company G, 35th U. S. Colored Infantry. J. C. White was the Captain of that company and Colonel James C. Beecher was the commander of the regiment. We saw active service in South Carolina, Florida and Georgia. I was wounded in the right leg at the battle of Alusta, Florida. After the war ended we were stationed for a time in South Carolina doing guard duty and were finally mustered out of the service on June 1, 1866.

      Why were they out of service so soon? It seemed they should have been in service longer since they had to fight for so long to get the operation up and running. It seemed they only faced a one time act of service.

    3. I took part in that attack as a guide and had a horse shot from under me. A few days later I told Colonel Leggett that I would not fight anymore unless I was prepared to defend myself. He said, “We never will take niggers in the army to fight. The war will be over before your people ever get in.” I replied, “The war will not be over until I have had a chance to spill my blood. If that is your feeling toward me, pay me what you owe me and I will take it and go.” He owed me five dollars and he paid me. I took that five dollars and hired the A. M. E. Zion church at Newbern and commenced to recruit a regiment of colored men. I secured the thousand men and they appointed me as their colonel and I drilled them with cornstalks for guns.

      I see how this gave William Singleton the hunger for wanting a space of his own. How he collected all black men for war just to hold space in what he wanted in life or what he felt destined to do. I wonder how long it took for them to gain their freedom and receive the equipment they needed in order to fight?

    4. Then I was taken to General Burnside’s headquarters and asked the best way to reach the rebels at Wives Forks, before you could get into Kinston. I laid the route out for them the best I knew how, but said that if I were going to command the expedition I would give them a flank movement by the way of the Trent river, which was five miles farther from Wives Forks than the Neuse river. But they did not accept my proposition and attacked directly, with the result that they were repulsed.

      I believe that they didn't accept his commands or directions because of his race. I haven't read the second paragraph yet but I'm already sensing this. Because they did not listen to his flanking commands, they were attacked.

    5. William Henry Singleton was born to his enslaved mother, Lettice, and her master’s brother, William Singleton. At the age of four he was sold away from his mother, but ran back to her several times throughout his life. When the war broke out, he escaped to Union lines and volunteered for service. After being dismissed, he rallied one thousand Black soldiers and received a promotion as a sergeant.

      since he is mixed, they were still being sold? he wouldnt be apart of the master's brother's family (kinda)?

  2. Nov 2024
    1. The Americans may be as vigilant as they please, but they cannot be vigilant enough for the Lord, neither can they hide themselves, where he will not find and bring them out.

      God has something In store for the people who enslave African Americans and they cannot hide from whatever it is in store.

    2. David Walker was the son of an enslaved man and a free Black woman. He traveled widely before settling in Boston where he worked in and owned clothing stores and involved himself in various reform causes. In 1829, he wrote the remarkable Appeal to the Colored Citizens of the World. In it, he exposed the hypocrisies of American claims of freedom and Christianity, attacked the plan to colonize Black Americans in Africa, and predicted that God’s justice promised violence for the enslaving United States.

      This appeal was very revolutionary for the time of colored people and I believe it holds a lot more weight coming from a free black man who made a name for himself, owning a clothing store. He really expresses his reasoning and points very well and communicates in a place of exasperation.

    3. Now, Americans! I ask you candidly, was your sufferings under Great Britain, one hundredth part as cruel and tyranical as you have rendered ours under you? Some of you, no doubt, believe that we will never throw off your murderous government and “provide new guards for our future security.” If Satan has made you believe it, will he not deceive you? Do the whites say, I being a black man, ought to be humble, which I readily admit? I ask them, ought they not to be as humble as I? or do they think that they can measure arms with Jehovah? Will not the Lord yet humble them? or will not these very coloured people whom they now treat worse than brutes, yet under God, humble them low down enough? Some of the whites are ignorant enough to tell us that we ought to be submissive to them, that they may keep their feet on our throats. And if we do not submit to be beaten to death by them, we are bad creatures and of course must be damned, &c. If any man wishes to hear this doctrine openly preached to us by the American preachers, let him go into the Southern and Western sections of this country—I do not speak from hear say—what I have written, is what I have seen and heard myself. No man may think that my book is made up of conjecture— I have travelled and observed nearly the whole of those things myself, and what little I did not get by my own observation, I received from those among the whites and blacks, in whom the greatest confidence may be placed.

      He relates America finally becoming independent from Great Britain and the fight it took to get there. Although, I'm not sure if I would compare it to America becoming independent. Although, I took this as Americans should be humble as well as the colored people for gaining their freedom and not being free yet.

    4. I also ask the attention of the world of mankind to the declaration of these very American people, of the United States. A declaration made July 4, 1776. It says, “When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the Powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature’s God entitle them. A decent respect for the opinions of mankind requires, that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.—We hold these truths to be self evident—that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights: that among these, are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness ….” See your Declaration Americans!!! Do you understand your own language? Hear your language, proclaimed to the world, July 4th, 1776—”We hold these truths to be self evident—that ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL!! that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness!!” Compare your own language above, extracted from your Declaration of Independence, with your cruelties and murders inflicted by your cruel and unmerciful fathers and yourselves on our fathers and on us—men who have never given your fathers or you the least provocation!!!!!!

      Here David is pointing out the hypocrisy of The Declaration of Independents. I find it very necessary that he points out that they don't know their own language. They don't mean ALL men they mean all WHITE men in The Declaration of Independence. They should have just said that because they have done it before.

    5. …Will any of us leave our homes and go to Africa? I hope not. Let them commence their attack upon us as they did on our brethren in Ohio, driving and beating us from our country, and my soul for theirs, they will have enough of it. Let no man of us budge one step, and let slave-holders come to beat us from our country. America is more our country, than it is the whites—we have enriched it with our blood and tears. The greatest riches in all America have arisen from our blood and tears:—and will they drive us from our property and homes, which we have earned with our blood? They must look sharp or this very thing will bring swift destruction upon them. The Americans have got so fat on our blood and groans, that they have almost forgotten the God of armies. But let them go on…

      David claims that African Americans have contributed to America than whites have. Which in his reasoning seems to be fair and understandable. Slave had a lot of blood sweat and tears which is just what America was built on. They were the reasons the slave owners made a profit and did most of the work.

    6. … But against all accusations which may or can be preferred against me, I appeal to Heaven for my motive in writing—who knows what my object is, if possible, to awaken in the breasts of my afflicted, degraded and slumbering brethren, a spirit of inquiry and investigation respecting our miseries and wretchedness in this Republican Land of Liberty!!!!!!

      Since the people of Boston aren't listening or doing anything why not to his appeal to the source? Heaven. Since he is a christian it would only seem like heaven would be the one listening over anyone else.

    7. Having travelled over a considerable portion of these United States, and having, in the course of my travels, taken the most accurate observations of things as they exist—the result of my observations has warranted the full and unshaken conviction, that we, (coloured people of these United States,) are the most degraded, wretched, and abject set of beings that ever lived since the world began; and I pray God that none like us ever may live again until time shall be no more. They tell us of the Israelites in Egypt, the Helots in Sparta, and of the Roman Slaves, which last were made up from almost every nation under heaven, whose sufferings under those ancient and heathen nations, were, in comparison with ours, under this enlightened and Christian nation, no more than a cypher—or, in other words, those heathen nations of antiquity, had but little more among them than the name and form of slavery; while wretchedness and endless miseries were reserved, apparently in a phial, to be poured out upon our fathers, ourselves and our children, by Christian Americans!

      David Walker compared Israelites and the Helots to African Americans being slaves and I think the matter of time in between these events affects this the most. Slavery wasn't that long ago even now and at the time he was writing the appeal, it was still happening. He knows there should have been some kind of growth since there was so much time in between events. They should have learned to treat everyone equal. Especially if they are christian and treating others like this is just hypocrisy.

    1. Southern women often marry a man knowing that he is the father of many little slaves. They do not trouble themselves about it. They regard such children as property, as marketable as the pigs on the plantation; and it is seldom that they do not make them aware of this by passing them into the slave-trader’s hands as soon as possible, and thus getting them out of their sight. I am glad to say there are some honorable exceptions.

      The southern woman don't care about what the men do as long as they have a nice life of their own and they don't have to lift a finger. As long as the children made them money and did the back breaking work, the wives could not care less about the man being a father the slave children.

    2. Though this bad institution deadens the moral sense, even in white women, to a fearful extent, it is not altogether extinct. I have heard southern ladies say of Mr. Such a one, “He not only thinks it no disgrace to be the father of those little niggers, but he is not ashamed to call himself their master. I declare, such things ought not to be tolerated in any decent society!”

      Linda recollects the women saying how immoral or wrong it is to reproduce with the slave women but I just see it as another example of their jealousy as well. Harriet had written about this before.

    3. I have myself known two southern wives who exhorted their husbands to free those slaves towards whom they stood in a “parental relation;” and their request was granted. These husbands blushed before the superior nobleness of their wives’ natures. Though they had only counseled them to do that which it was their duty to do, it commanded their respect, and rendered their conduct more exemplary. Concealment was at an end, and confidence took the place of distrust.

      Very rarely did the wives ask for the slave children to be freed as they needed their parent in their lives. This was also because ,most women were jealous of the slave women the husbands impregnated and started to see them as equal, rather than inhumane.

    4. The poor girls have romantic notions of a sunny clime, and of the flowering vines that all the year round shade a happy home. To what disappointments are they destined! The young wife soon learns that the husband in whose hands she has placed her happiness pays no regard to his marriage vows. Children of every shade of complexion play with her own fair babies, and too well she knows that they are born unto him of his own household. Jealousy and hatred enter the flowery home, and it is ravaged of its loveliness.

      It's a pessimistic view on how little girls who grow into women should expect to be disappointed in their future. The men who their dream a future with won't keep their promises and won't live up to much.She has a good reason for this idea though.

    5. My grandmother could not avoid seeing things which excited her suspicions. She was uneasy about me, and tried various ways to buy me;

      Obviously her grandmother knew something was up and could see that she was on the path to facing the same fate as the other slave women.

    6. ” I answered that he had reasons of his own for screening me from punishment, and that the course he pursued made my mistress hate me and persecute me. If I wept, he would say, “Poor child! Don’t cry! don’t cry! I will make peace for you with your mistress. Only let me arrange matters in my own way. Poor, foolish girl! you don’t know what is for your own good. I would cherish you. I would make a lady of you. Now go, and think of all I have promised you.”

      Her master seems to be turning his daughter against "Linda" and when his daughter treats her wrong, "Linda" cries. For some reason Her master comes to Linda's aid and claim to make a woman out of her. Does it mean that he will assault her? Or make her have his children?

    7. The secrets of slavery are concealed like those of the Inquisition. My master was, to my knowledge, the father of eleven slaves. But did the mothers dare to tell who was the father of their children? Did the other slaves dare to allude to it, except in whispers among themselves? No, indeed! They knew too well the terrible consequences.

      Why did the master have so many children from slaves? If I were to guess, they would do this to birth more workers if the slaves weren't reproducing with each other. Most likely it was used as a form of control to show them they are just like livestock.

    1. The existing restriction on suffrage is, then, we think, clearly in opposition to the real intention of our ancestors, and to the spirit of democracy which they established… If it were unjust for our forefathers to be taxes without representation, it is equally unjust for our their descendants to be so taxed by their brethren, as long as they have not vote in determining either the quantity or appropriation…

      This part I agree with and may be the only portion wthat I don. What kind of democracy would allow no representation in government. There is a parallel with the founding fathers, alluding that they were more of a democracy and believed that every citizen should have a say in how much they are taxed or who is elected.

    2. The majority of lawyers, clergymen, and physicians, as a body, certainly are not landholders, and yet we freely intrust our property, our consciences, and our lives, to men who, the law says, are too ignorant and corrupt to vote for a constable!…

      Since these careers are considered "honest" and they work honest jobs, shouldn't they be allowed to vote? They are in charge of some of the most important jobs, the physician is in charge of our bodies and the lawyers are in charge of our lives. Interpreting lives and regulations to citizens. They contributed a lot to society.

    3. The majority of lawyers, clergymen, and physicians, as a body, certainly are not landholders, and yet we freely intrust our property, our consciences, and our lives, to men who, the law says, are too ignorant and corrupt to vote for a constable!…

      So since these men are considered "honest" why aren't they allowed to vote? If they are entrusted with our bodies, like physicians, or our lives? For example how lawyers interpret rules and regulations to citizens.

    4. But this restriction is not merely burdensome upon traders and mechanics. How fare the younger sons of farmers? True, a sort of virtue is transmitted from the land-owner, but it reaches no farther than the first-born son… the real question is why either of the sons, or any other person should be exempted from the general law of qualification, whatever it may be. No good reason has been, nor can be, given…

      Instead of saying the argument that owning land doesn't make you an honest man, it should be that beholding a degree doesn't make you an honest man. They have to pay taxes and contribute to society as well. That seems pretty honest to me, unfair that they can't at least vote.

    5. …the condition of things has changed—the towns have changed; new interests have sprung up, and useful citizens, who own no land, but who contribute by their occupations, and by the payment of taxes to the extend of their means, their proportionate measure to the public welfare. Yet these men have no voice in the government which they contribute to support; being excluded upon the false notion that landed property is the only kind that is decisive of a man’s intelligence and honesty. Look at the hardship of the case of a mechanic, for instance. He has received a common education; he has served as a journeyman, and is now about to commence business for himself with some small earnings of his own; his savings are only sufficient to procure the implements of his trade. After faily starting in life on his own account, he becomes anxious to provide for himself a home. He marries; he hires a tenement; in the course of time he acquires more money, which his interest demands should be invested in the stock of his trade. He is fully able to purchase one hundred and thirty four dollars worth of land; but it is, in most cases, against his interest to do so, until he can purchase a great deal more. In the mean time, he is debarred from the polls; and if he asks why, the answer must be that the non freeholders are too ignorant and dishonest to be trusted in so important a matter as voting. This we believe is a fair statement of the case of hundreds of mechanics in this State…

      This paragraph is saying that the typical landowner or earner has to be more intelligent or honest to go to any polls. It is unfair and pretty much just tells us that only those with degrees are honest people. Which is not true either. An honest person is one who works an honest job, makes honest money, and raises a home based on decent morals. Not only those who hold degrees, not many people can afford the road to getting one.

    6. …whatever course a true patriot might feel himself to adopt in one of the corrupt monarchies of the old world, no such reason can e given for a postponement of political rights in our own country. No privileged orders have ever existed in it, to create a vast inequality which prevails elsewhere between the many and the few. A freedom was brought with the by our ancestors, and has ever subsisted among us…The true American doctrine is, that the majority have not only a right to govern, but that they are sufficiently intelligent and honest to govern; and that, if there be any doubt about this sufficiency, we ought immediately to set to work and build more schools. Men in Europe, who are opposed to any further improvement in government, may talk about the necessity of “barring out the people,” and of “defending themselves against the people.” But this will not do here…

      Interesting how this paragraph states that in order to being American or behave in the American way, you have to be intelligent, honest, and make good decisions. America isn't exactly built on honesty and during this period, it was more ignorance than intelligence in a lot of cases. There are a lot of contradictions in this portion. If the American way is to educate then make more means of educating instead of shutting out people who aren't as educated.

    7. …We have arrived at the conclusion that government was designed for the protection and perpetuation of rights—not derived from itself, but natural and inherent—in such a way as to promote the greatest good of the whole; and that the question now before us is, not what right of suffrage the government ought to grant as a gift, but with what restrictions, required by this greatest good, suffrage may be claimed as a right by the people of this State. Is it consistent with this general good that the present landed qualifications should be any longer continued…?

      This states suffrage as a natural and American right and people should not need a significant amount or any land to be able to uphold their natural and American right.

    8. Many poor white men gained voting rights, also known as suffrage, for the first time in the 1830s. These changes in American democracy did not take place without conflict. Voting rights in Rhode Island only changed after poor Rhode Islanders raised a militia and threatened violence. Below is the proposal of many of the men who seven years later took up arms to fight for voting rights.

      It seems like only rich white men could only vote, but did it not matter what kind of rich white men? Only lawyers, clergymen, or politicians? It took way longer for women to vote and African American MALES were only allowed to vote around 1870.