Sometimes an argument points toward something worth considering even if it doesn’t convince us completely
This does make sense since it can solve another truth to gets to the main point of the argument
Sometimes an argument points toward something worth considering even if it doesn’t convince us completely
This does make sense since it can solve another truth to gets to the main point of the argument
e might conclude that an argument is not valid, but still see ways in which this argument can help us get closer to the truth on a particular topic.
This statement to me doesn't make sense because if we don't agree with the topic then how does it get us closer to the truth?
However, even if we do find weaknesses, it’s important to recognize any contributions as well
This doesn't make sense to me because even if I don't agree with the statement, I have to agree with some things?