4 Matching Annotations
  1. Jan 2017
    1. It offended him both as a lawyer and as a lover of the sane and customary sides of life, to whom the fanciful was the immodest. And hitherto it was his ignorance of Mr. Hyde that had swelled his indignation; now, by a sudden turn, it was his knowledge.

      FORM: explicit, The meaning of this statement is explicitly telling the readers Mr. Utterson's feelings and why he feels that way. He's offended and it's due to his ignorance of Mr. Hyde. This section tells us exactly Mr. Utterson's feelings within the context of the story as a whole at the moment.

    1. The inhabitants were all doing well, it seemed, and all emulously hoping to do better still, and laying out the surplus of their gains in coquetry; so that the shop fronts stood along that thoroughfare with an air of invitation, like rows of smiling saleswomen. Even on Sunday, when it veiled its more florid charms and lay comparatively empty of passage, the street shone out in contrast to its dingy neighbourhood, like a fire in a forest; and with its freshly painted shutters, well-polished brasses, and general cleanliness and gaiety of note, instantly caught and pleased the eye of the passenger.   4   Two doors from one corner, on the left hand going east, the line was broken by the entry of a court; and just at that point, a certain sinister block of building thrust forward its gable on the street. It was two stories high; showed no window, nothing but a door on the lower story and a blind forehead of discoloured wall on the upper; and bore in every feature, the marks of prolonged and sordid negligence. The door, which was equipped with neither bell nor knocker, was blistered and distained. Tramps slouched into the recess and struck matches on the panels; children kept shop upon the steps; the schoolboy had tried his knife on the mouldings; and for close on a generation, no one had appeared to drive away these random visitors or to repair their ravages.

      D&V: Sorry to overlap someone else's annotation, I just wanted to make sure I got all I needed highlighted. This is a blatant case of difference and variation. There is painstaking detail at how beautiful and nice this street looks, describing how it's clean and welcoming and freshly painted. This juxtaposes greatly with the next paragraph which describes a hideous building. It has no windows, it only has one blistered door (clearly not freshly painted) without even a bell or knocker, polished or otherwise. On top of this, instead of the cheerful, happy people on the street, there are tramps sitting in front of this building and children playing with knives on the doorstep. Clearly a very, very different image.

    2. It was a nut to crack for many, what these two could see in each other, or what subject they could find in common. It was reported by those who encountered them in their Sunday walks, that they said nothing, looked singularly dull, and would hail with obvious relief the appearance of a friend.

      FORM: implicit meaning, In opposition to the statement above it which actively told the reader about Mr. Utterson's personality, this statement is a much tougher nut to crack, so to speak. It is left up to the reader's interpretation as to the relationship between the two men and why they are so close. Though it may be answered later, for the moment the reader is left to ponder why they are friends. It is clear this is meant to be questioned as well because other people in the context of the story don't seem to understand it either.

    3. It is the mark of a modest man to accept his friendly circle ready-made from the hands of opportunity; and that was the lawyer’s way. His friends were those of his own blood or those whom he had known the longest; his affections, like ivy, were the growth of time, they implied no aptness in the object.

      FORM: referential meaning, This passage is specifically telling us what kind of man Mr. Utterson is, he is the type of man who doesn't need to work hard to make friends and doesn't ever attempt to make new ones. This passage serves to tell the audience about what kind of a person Mr. Utterson is so they are able to either relate it or juxtapose it later on.