have a white husband and two- eighth– blood boys that I would kill for, or die for, or just be for
This shows how much mixed whites were treated better than full blood indians.
have a white husband and two- eighth– blood boys that I would kill for, or die for, or just be for
This shows how much mixed whites were treated better than full blood indians.
I had been flung to the waiting arms of a world who found Indians repulsive, with our lazy, drunk, promiscuous ways
This is very sad because her aunt is simply reinforcing the negative viewpoints of Native Americans around this time period.
This is virtually impossible to achieve. Many Menominee arescattered throughout the country; many do not un(lerstand the rightto vote by proxy.
So the right to voting was not explicitly denied, it was simply offered in a way which was too confusing and difficult. This isn't as bad, but still, no one made an effort to make voting more convenient and accessible to Native people.
If it has not been taken care of, it is an oversight. It has alwaysbeen regarded as such.
Very sad that it's just an "oversight". A basic right allotted to all Americans is just overlooked as it has not been taken care of. Not only is this ignorant, it's simply just showing that the government does not care enough about the Native people to do something about this injustice.
This is the greatest gift we gave to you, the concept of freedom. You did not have this. Now that you have taken it and built a constitution and country around it, you deny freedom to us.
Interesting point made by Native people. The colonizers who moved to America did so in order to gain freedom from Britain. However, once they received that freedom after fighting so hard for it, they turned around and neglect the Native people just as Great Britain did to them before the Revolutionary War.
In 1866, the U.S. government forced the Cherokees, among others, to enfranchise their emancipated slaves, referred to as “Freedmen.
I think we need to be very careful when evaluating what happened here. In many other circumstances we might have biased, strong feelings against what the United States made the Native Americans do. However, just because slavery is a highly offensive concept to us because we as a people outlawed it, we have to realize that this also was part of their civilization, as gruesome as it may be. So now the question is, was this a positive thing because slaves were emancipated or was it negative because it was an attack on Native American civilization?
I am just talking as one Indian to another.
This is interesting as he was the "trailblazer" in a sense for Indians in this newfound American society. However, he stops and takes the time to speak to his people which he came from.
And as we have seen many times now, translations bythemselves of works in Hawaiian tend to leave out the multiple mean-ings and Hawaiian cultural connotations present in the originals.
This is important to understand while reading these documents because we can't fully understand the cultural implications without understanding the native language. Even translated it loses the meaning of the original language.
the people responded by expressingtheir solidarity with her. They also sent mele out from their jail cells to beprinted in Ka Makaainana.
Kind of inspiring how strong these people were in fighting back even though confined to imprisonment.
Her main message in these mele was that her heartwas still with her people and her nation, and that contrary to the repre-sentation being made by the prorepublic papers she had not abandonedthe po¿e aloha ¿ ̄aina or the struggle for their nation.
Really sad she had to clarify these thoughts of hers through mele... Since she had no way of saying it straight up.
In addition to these discursive and other actions directed at theAmerican public the queen spent considerable thought and energy inmaintaining the hopes and spirits of her own people.
What kinds of other things did she do for her people to keep them in a good, positive mindset about the situation?
‘debauchedQueen of a heathenish monarchy where . . . the kahuna sorcerers andidolators, all of the white corruptionists, and those who wish to makeHonolulu a center for the manufacture and distribution of opium lietogether with the lewd and drunken majority of the native race.’’
Negative propaganda against the Republic of Hawai'i. Portraying them as heathens who were going to infect the states with drugs and terrible behavior in an attempt to win over the American people.
attempted to promulgate a constitution that removedthe race and language requirements for the franchise, restored her ex-ecutive powers, restored the guarantee of inviolability of the sovereign’sproperty, and either eliminated or lessened the property requirementsfor voters.
"attempted"? So I'm guessing her plan to write and enforce this constitution failed.
o-called Republic of Hawai‘
"so-called Republic of Hawai'i" - This shows how the United States viewed the nation and how it did not respect its' sovereign power.
And for this reason, probably, they could not be satisfied even with the splendid results which our continued nationality offered them.
I'm not sure how "splendid" the results actually were. This writing seems a little biased. Yes, you have good intent in mind, we can give the benefit of the doubt there. However, the native Hawaiians on the receiving end don't think this way, and wanted to keep independence to rule their land and live on their own without forced policies and outside government.
At Colville, this process took on an international dimension whenapplicants had ties to or had lived with tribal kin and family members inBritish Columbia.
This would be very annoying to have your home split in two by two outside powers. Imagine you had family over the border, now to get to them and maintain relationships just got a lot harder.
Feeling provoked, Hill shot and killed Cultus Jim.
Seriously you had to kill him over fishing grounds?... The 19th century was a wild time...
Between the late 1870s and the early 1900s, the Sinixt, Ktunaxa, andOkanagan peoples engaged with the border in ways that variously dis-regarded, undermined, and exploited its delineation of nation-state sover-eignty.
Good for them, no one ever asked before splitting their land in two. When creating the border between Canada and the US no one factored in the native territories, so this is only expected to happen...
At the same time,they maintained and performed their tribal identities as Okanagan, Skoy-lepi, and Sinixt peoples, based on cultural ties to their aboriginal lands andindigenous communities, including those north of the US-Canadian border.
It's interesting that they keep their ties to their aboriginal lands and keep their tribal identities. It shows how they kind of live a double life of being US "citizens" and also respectfully acknowledging who they really are and where they came from.
Boarding school history offers a plausible explanation for how and why colonial-ism has been destructive to American Indian community life, with the resulting losses to tradition and especially to the Native languages of North America.
While initially positive and while it did have some positive effects, I still agree with this statement that tradition and Native languages were lost in the midst.
The generation who experienced schooling during the peak years of assimilation policies in the United States, the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, has now passed away.
Kinda sad no one who was actually involved in the assimilation period is still alive to tell the story as it was exactly.
It is worth examining how Indian people remember the history of boarding school, perceptions of which have no doubt changed over time.
I wonder how long it took for the Native Americans to realize and come together as a people to reject assimilation. They initially thought that graduating from these schools offered opportunity and prejudice, which is true, but it is no less important than Cherokee life before allotment and assimilation.
the girls already had developed the confidence to pursue careers in the business world and were not afraid to interact with whites
Very intriguing how independent and headstrong the Cherokee women were. It's impressive how they could pursue careers in business so early on.
They took every opportunity to flaunt their white ancestry.
This is really sad. Embracing every part of your ancestry is what is best. White supremacy even found a way to lodge itself in the minds of mixed Native Americans.
but many were not particularly happy about it and wanted the type of education offered at the seminary.
Why wouldn't you want to learn your own culture's language and writing???!
Mixed-blood students frequently scorned those girls who had less white blood and darker skin.
Very interesting to me, as a mixed person myself, I sometimes find myself not able to really associate with full blood Chinese or full blood White people. I'm sure it would be a lot different if I was half native American or African American or something like that though.
five-dollar-per-semester tuition
Kind of unrelated but wow that's some intense inflation we have going on here.
The Dawes commissioners understood none of this activism
How do you not understand the heartfelt petitions written by tribal leaders? They were literally taught English so that they could communicate properly with the US government. Very sad that this misunderstanding happened and the activism was viewed as manipulation.
full blood" to refer to those who spoke Cherokee as their primary language and who were perceived by other Cherokees as behav. ing in ways that were considered traditional.
Very interesting. So in theory if you were full white, but you spoke the language as your first language and acted like a Cherokee, they would call you a full-blood.
women retained cu tody of their children after divorce, a practice with its origins in the Cherokees' matril ineal kinship system.
Just interesting^^. Never knew that the women automatically retained custody after divorce in Cherokee culture.
By the standards of non-Indian society, she was an adulteress, but among Cherokees, serial monogamy and divorce by mutual consent were normal.
This is another example of how non-native Americans confused their law and religion with what the Cherokees saw as culturally acceptable.
To a peo· pie who conceptualized prosperity as a reflection of their interconnected-ness with one another, such a reduction was pauperizing.
A huge part of Cherokee culture is the relationships of people within the nation. To take away that importance is such a huge mistake.
For this reason, many so-called full bloods actually had non-Indian ancestry, and many Cherokees of mixed parentage raised in traditional and conservative communities behaved accordingly.
This is very intirguing because my granpa was raised in a non-Indian household although he was half cherokee.
Steve Dog, or S-di-wi in Cherokee, was also known as Stephen Glory. His wife, called Day-yeh-ni in Cherokee, appears in the records as both annie and Nancy.
You can see the assimilation happening with the names here. These names are inherently white/European. I don't think this is a terrible idea though, as many people today still go by their name given at birth and then an English name for the sake of ease.
Ethnohistory is a disciplinary hybrid, a fusion of historical and anthropological approaches enabling scholars to study American Indian history despite gaps in the documentary record and misrepresentations of indigenous people in written in formation authored by non-Indians.
i've never heard of this, although it's interesting that it is its own field.
Some Cherokees may have moved west to California on what Smith calls the "economic Trail of Tears."
To get out of hardship, a change must be made eventually. However, the Trail of Tears was a massively long journey and hugely grueling for anyone who would attempt it. I feel like in the end it was worth it to preserve the people and culture though.
ln 2003, Chadwick mith, the principal chief of the Cherokee ation, estimated that Cherokees lost over go percent of their pre-allotment acreage by 1920 and have since struggled to keep what remains in their families.1
The history of allotment to the Native Americans, especially Cherokee, is extremely depressing. I find this even more shocking because my great grandmother was full Cherokee. She was probably living around this time and it's sad to think about how much poor land they had to work with.
he subdivision of common land into smaller, individually owned tracts-was a central component of fed-eral-Indian relations.
This is at least a step in the right direction because they acknowledged the "communalism characteristic of most indigenous societies."
and convincing them that doing so was wrong.
This comes as a bit of a surprise because these relationships pulled through and saved Nannie although you would think that she would otherwise be left on her own.
They could not live on either of their allotments, which were not well suited for farming and were located too far from the school their children attended.
Very annoying for the people who were allotted this land. Everything about this is just not ideal. Again, you could view this as "shocking and unfortunate" or realize that the United States gave the very poor land to these people.
Lhe Dawes Commission alloued die farm that she shared wilh her husband, Tom, to him because they believed adult men to be the right-ful heilds-of-households
This is another example of cultural implications that the United States failed to ask about or even acknowledge. This is a concept, while massively popular with many other cultures, that isn't necessarily cemented as truth in every culture on earth.
The purpose of the Dawes Act and the subsequent acts that extended its initial provisions was purportedly to protect Indian property rights, particularly during the land rushes of the 1890s, but in many instances the results were vastly different.
Although the intentions might have seemed appropriate to allot land to native Americans, the land they were actually given was extremely poor and unsuitable not only for farming, but for living in general. I find this interesting because it seems like the intentions were good. Some manipulation might have gone on here.