2 Matching Annotations
  1. Nov 2025
    1. Little has been published, particularly from the North American perspective, aboutIndigenous Knowledge organization (and specifically in the area of developing localthesauri), but there are some published works that have discussed various aspects ofthe issues involved.

      Indigenous approaches to organizing knowledge remain underrepresented in mainstream LIS scholarship. This also implicitly situates projects like AIATSIS or Māori Subject Headings as important but not fully transferable models, reinforcing the urgency for North American frameworks grounded in local cultural contexts.

    2. Another part of the terminology "problem", as identifiedby Farris, is that in Canada it is difficult to find agreement on a "one-size-fits-all" subjectheading that would match the LCSH term, likely due to the many differences betweencultural groups and the wide range of demographics of various users.

      There is tension at the heart of decolonizing knowledge organization between the need to balance standardization with cultural specificity. This suggests that resolving this tension might require moving away from “one-size-fits-all” models altogether, and toward systems that are flexible, plural, and community-sensitive.