third-person reference or shortened so that it almost snapped out of the mouth
key idea of how much pronunciation, context, and usage can impact meaning
third-person reference or shortened so that it almost snapped out of the mouth
key idea of how much pronunciation, context, and usage can impact meaning
there was still a rigid set of rules about what was said and how
this can be applicable to society as a whole today
oldproverb“sticksandstonescanbreakmybones,butnameswillneverhurtme”i
biblical reference
legalrealists
key term
(Rule404oftheFederalRulesofEvidence).
reference
conceptualvocabularyofthelaw,FelixCohen,lawyerandlegalrealist
citation
Alice-in-Wonderland
reference
It’sarhetoricalcontest
key term
morethingstorememberandmorewaystogowrong.
interesting idea here
buttheopposinglawyersarenotsupposedtobemakingarguments—theyaresupposedtobeelicitingevidence
who decides what is "supposed" to happen.. what encompasses evidence
We prefer sticking to the point, and insuring ourselves againstchange
key idea
To err is human, we say, but we don't like the idea much,
we contradict our own ideas
mistakes.
what does the author define as a "mistake"
it is no accident at all that mutations occur; the molecule of DNA was ordainedfrom the beginning to make small mistakes
could apply to lots of things, possibly even human kind
We would have made one fatal mistake: our molecule wouldhave been perfect.
interesting idea here
the method used for growth and replication is essentially unchange
open to interpretation
The greatest single achievement of nature to date was surely the invention of the molecule ofDNA.
introduces the main idea clearly and effectively
For many speakers, beliefs about the correctness of standard vari-eties of language and the incorrectness of nonstandard varieties are deeply en-trenched. They are backed by many grammar books and language pundits—to thepoint where they seem “commonsense” ideas about “Standard English.”
key idea- also, demonstrates the important role that power and posture within society plays in creating this idea of a "correct" structure of language
One telling example he provides is taken fromthe videoA Private Universe
reference
This intertwining of structural and social linguistic topics is critical.
main idea, ties into questions of AAVE vs. SAE, etc. and what is perceived as the "norm"
Wolfram and Schilling-Estes(1998, 281-84) u
reference
Declaration
reference to famous document to further invoke main point
When the work of abstract artists like Braque and Picassofirst appeared, it was declared by the tastemakers then in power not to be art.
reference, and also a key idea that displays the power of perception
Saul of Tarsus.
reference, several Christian references as Fish explores this idea
Scalia
reference
identity, intimacy, aspiration, and dignity, all wordsKennedy uses
reference
ow our system of government is supposed towork.”
is there one set way? this is up for interpretation
The skeptic
key term, applies outside of the religious context as well
Absolutists
key term
Here the bottom-line opposition is between absolute right on the one hand andsecurity and the saving of lives on the other. The starting point for debate is the“ticking bomb” scenario: a bomb that will kill hundreds or thousands or millionshas been placed in an unknown location and is set to go off in hours.
we can also see this in modern day time on the individual, domestic, and international scales, proposes a key idea
there is no neutral space from the vantage point of which the varieties of spincan be inventoried and assessed
everyone has a sort of inherent bias
That fashioning is called,derogatively, “spin,”
key term, we see this a lot in modern day media
Moynihan’s pithy endorsement of fact over rhetoric is itself a piece of rhetoric,
part of exigence
You are entitled to your own facts ifyou can make them stick.
facts are relative, everyone has a different perception of the truth
Reality with a capital R t
citation to rorty
this book tries to do is explain how argument works indifferent contexts.
key idea
I am making anargument about argument and its relationship to the human condition.
important concept
how do you knowwhich of the things you might say will win you points in the game, and whichwill mark you as a nonserious player?
interesting point, why did he use this type of analogy?