28 Matching Annotations
  1. May 2024
    1. She believes this will directly impact ‘’mostly poor women who have no other options,’

      Probability

    2. The overturning of Roe v. Wade is one of the biggest injustices against women. It’s a social setback that will affect so many women alive now and future generations to come. It breaks my heart to pieces. I share the anxiety and worry that millions of women around our country feel. I’m worried about the future of our country because all I can think about is “What’s next?” Women will have to go to such extreme lengths to do as they please with their bodies, and for what? This country promises “freedom and justice,” but where is our “freedom and justice,” when there are laws within our nation that restrict what we can do with our bodies? It seems as though a woman’s life isn’t as valuable as an embryo or fetus. When will people realize that we are human beings whose existence extends beyond the role of being a mother?

      Legal and moral reasoning

    3. “Why should it be acceptable for others to believe that it is OK for us not to have a say or a choice in what we do with our bodies?”

      Moral reasoning

    4. This will have an impact on women who live in poverty, as well as underage girls, undocumented women who risk deportation and women who have been raped. Even pregnant women who experience nonviable pregnancies and miscarriages will not be able to access or receive the essential medical care they need. Due to their state legislators, these women are among those who “have no options.’’

      Moral reasoning

    5. After signing such a bill on June 24, Gov. Gavin Newsom released a statement that said, ‘’We know that states like Missouri are already targeting women seeking abortions in states like California where abortion remains legal.’’ Assembly Bill 1666 by Assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan, D-Orinda, seeks to protect those in California from civil liability “for providing, aiding, or receiving abortion care in the state.” Although it is wonderful that states are taking action to protect women who travel to them from the legal repercussions of getting an abortion,

      Legal reasoning

    6. Several states are now trying to ban all or most abortions while others want to restrict them after 12 weeks of pregnancy. Some of these government-imposed limitations even prevent individuals from accessing or purchasing abortion pills in their state and having them mailed from other states as well. Despite how horrifying this is, some states are taking action to protect women’s constitutional right to abortions. States like California are making it easier for people to travel to get an abortion, by providing legal protection to those who don’t have access in their state.

      Legal reasoning

    7. are accountable for all the women in this country who will die as a result of their decision.

      Moral reasoning

    8. Republicans who use their religious beliefs to justify being pro-life and against abortions.

      Moral reasoning

    9. What is there to be optimistic about or look forward to when I live in a country where our highest court stripped every woman in it of their constitutional right to an abortion?

      Legal (constitutional) and moral reasoning

    10. The five judges — Samuel Alito, Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Clarence Thomas — who voted to overturn Roe v. Wade, which in 1973 conferred the constitutional right to have an abortion, are accountable for all the women in this country who will die as a result of their decision. Since their Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization ruling in June, states have been free to implement anti-abortion-related laws and any restrictions against abortion. This will have a significant impact on the lives of numerous women who live in states controlled by Republicans who use their religious beliefs to justify being pro-life and against abortions.

      Causality

    11. This will have an impact on women who live in poverty, as well as underage girls, undocumented women who risk deportation and women who have been raped. Even pregnant women who experience nonviable pregnancies and miscarriages will not be able to access or receive the essential medical care they need.

      Causality

    12. government-imposed limitations

      Causality

    13. Five states had bans in their state constitutions that took effect immediately upon the overturning of Roe v. Wade.

      Causality

    14. The overturning of Roe v. Wade is one of the biggest injustices against women. It’s a social setback that will affect so many women alive now and future generations to come. It breaks my heart to pieces. I share the anxiety and worry that millions of women around our country feel. I’m worried about the future of our country because all I can think about is “What’s next?” Women will have to go to such extreme lengths to do as they please with their bodies, and for what? This country promises “freedom and justice,” but where is our “freedom and justice,” when there are laws within our nation that restrict what we can do with our bodies? It seems as though a woman’s life isn’t as valuable as an embryo or fetus. When will people realize that we are human beings whose existence extends beyond the role of being a mother?

      Extended Argument

    15. This will have an impact on women who live in poverty, as well as underage girls, undocumented women who risk deportation and women who have been raped. Even pregnant women who experience nonviable pregnancies and miscarriages will not be able to access or receive the essential medical care they need. Due to their state legislators, these women are among those who “have no options.’’

      Extended Argument.

      This section gives many reasons and ways the overturning of this law will impact women across the nation.

    16. The overturning of Roe v. Wade is one of the biggest injustices against women.

      I almost feel as if this is a premise and an enthymeme. This is the title of the argument and a premise all in one, I feel as though this argument should have a different title and this should be a premise in the argument.

    17. The overturning of Roe v. Wade is one of the biggest injustices against women. Here’s why.

      This is a valid argument

    18. how can this be an effective answer when it only benefits a small percentage of women?

      Fallacy: Loaded question

    19. ‘’Middle-income and wealthier women will always find a way, whether it’s traveling to another state or even another country.’’ She believes this will directly impact ‘’mostly poor women who have no other options,’’ and I wholeheartedly agree.

      Cognitive Bias: Confirmation Bias

      Here, and throughout the entire article, the author is only presenting points and quotes that align and agree with her own viewpoint, failing to also present and debunk any counterarguments.

    20. This will have a significant impact on the lives of numerous women who live in states controlled by Republicans who use their religious beliefs to justify being pro-life and against abortions.

      Cognitive Bias: Attribution bias

      Here, the author is attributing individuals being either republican or religious to explain their pro-life belief system, which, in a lot of cases, simply isnt true.

    21. it only benefits those with resources and ignores many other women who aren’t fortunate enough and lack the financial means to travel for an abortion.

      Fallacy: False dichotomy

      I believe that this is and instance of false dichotomy because the author is essentially stating "you either have money to travel and get an abortion, or you are forced to carry a baby to term", which is simply not true. The author also fails to mention any alternative solutions to this issue.

    22. This will have a significant impact on the lives of numerous women who live in states controlled by Republicans who use their religious beliefs to justify being pro-life and against abortions.

      Fallacy: Composition

      Here the author is grouping an entire group of people together, seemingly believing that the majority of republicans share the same religious and ideologic viewpoint.

    23. Being a 17-year-old woman, I am constantly told to “look forward” to my future or to “be optimistic about what is yet to come,” but how can I do either since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade? What is there to be optimistic about or look forward to when I live in a country where our highest court stripped every woman in it of their constitutional right to an abortion?

      Fallacy: Appeal to emotion

      This paragraph aims to make people feel bad for the author. By claiming she "doest have anything to look forward to" the author is attempting to make people side with her. I also feel that that statement was a bit dramatic because there is so much that the author can accomplish in spite of this law being overturned.

    24. The five judges — Samuel Alito, Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Clarence Thomas — who voted to overturn Roe v. Wade, which in 1973 conferred the constitutional right to have an abortion, are accountable for all the women in this country who will die as a result of their decision.

      Fallacy: Slippery Slope

      As time progresses and technology advances, it is less and less likely that individuals will die as a result of childbirth.

    25. The overturning of Roe v. Wade is one of the biggest injustices against women. It’s a social setback that will affect so many women alive now and future generations to come. It breaks my heart to pieces. I share the anxiety and worry that millions of women around our country feel. I’m worried about the future of our country because all I can think about is “What’s next?” Women will have to go to such extreme lengths to do as they please with their bodies, and for what? This country promises “freedom and justice,” but where is our “freedom and justice,” when there are laws within our nation that restrict what we can do with our bodies? It seems as though a woman’s life isn’t as valuable as an embryo or fetus. When will people realize that we are human beings whose existence extends beyond the role of being a mother?

      Fallacy: Appeal to emotion

      Almost all of this paragraph is aimed to make people side with the author. Statements such as "it break s my heart to pieces" attempt to create discourse in the heart of a reader by appealing to their emotions.

    26. are accountable for all the women in this country who will die as a result of their decision

      Fallacy: Appeal to emotion

    27. Melissa Flournoy, a former state legislator from Louisiana and an advocate for women’s reproductive rights, said, ‘’Middle-income and wealthier women will always find a way, whether it’s traveling to another state or even another country.’’ She believes this will directly impact ‘’mostly poor women who have no other options,’’ and I wholeheartedly agree.

      Fallacy: Appeal to authority

      While this statement may be true, it is obvious that the author mainly believes it to be true simply because an authority figure said it first

    28. The overturning of Roe v. Wade is one of the biggest injustices against women. Here’s why.

      Argument