Overall, I was very skeptical using twitter in class. I never thought it would have such a huge impact on me with my education.
This is exactly how I felt
Overall, I was very skeptical using twitter in class. I never thought it would have such a huge impact on me with my education.
This is exactly how I felt
TweetDeck offers a convenient way to look at twitter by letting you view multiple timelines (i.e. hashtags) on one screen.
I also just learned what tweet deck was, I had never heard of this before my class started using it.
Now, sitting here a semester later I could have never imagined the profound effect that twitter would have on my education.
I am just going though this now. I am tweeting for a class and it has allowed me to connect with people and organizations I never knew existed and I am learning about current information in my field.
the need for learning contexts that bring together in-school and out-of-school learning and activity.
This is very important
provide social supports for learning through social media and online affinity groups,
I am just learning about this through my new Twitter for IDS
I now see the world a bit differently, and find myself constantly connecting everything I do/ come across.
I hope to see this in myself
Why? because it’s not information that was dumped on me. It’s not information that I was forced to regurgitate. It’s information that I voluntarily sought out and connect with my personal interests.
This is what I like about IDS, it lets you learn what you are interested in
I was linking the Biology to my personal life which was my inspiration and in doing this I found more links (a genetic link) that I continued to explore even further in my next post.
I have found that twitter helps me with this
I’m sure you can only imagine my surprise when I logged into the course to discover my first assignment was to set up a blog and twitter.
This is how I felt when I started IDS intro, I too am a conventional student that is used to and personally prefers hard copies. IDS opened a whole new world to me.
Teach your students how to edit Wikipedia articles. By adding new content, revising existing content, adding citations, or adding images, students can (with the support of the Wiki Education Foundation[20]) make direct contributions to one of the most popular public repositories for information.
I think this is a great thing if the information is factual. This is why so many professors do not allow wiki articles to be used. There is no way of knowing who put the information up and on what basis.
OERs are licensed with open licenses, which reflects not just a commitment to access in terms of the cost of knowledge, but also access in terms of the creation of knowledge.
This is the way it should be
This is precisely why the push to reduce the high cost of textbooks that has been the cornerstone of the OER movement has been a wake-up call for many of us who may not always have understood what we could do to directly impact the affordability of a college degree.
Sometimes I feel reluctant to finish my degree because of the debt it is putting me.
he postulated not only that OERs offer a free alternative to high-priced commercial textbooks, but also that the open license would allow students (and teaching faculty) to contribute to the knowledge commons, not just consume from it, in meaningful and lasting ways
Every person has different knowledge and being able to put all of that in makes for an invaluable resource
Because printed, copyright-protected learning materials are not easily (or legally) revised and remixed, it is unthinkable that we might simply start taking books apart in order to assemble exactly what we want and exactly what our students need.
This is so important, information is constantly changing and new ideas are always needing to be added to existing books, thus leading to multiple editions. By using OER you can update your books without causing the person to buy the newest edition.
Clearly, the Internet has empowered us to copy and share with an efficiency never before known or imagined.
We should take advantage of this
“Open educational resources” (or OER) have become a widely discussed topic in recent years
I had never heard of this before IDS
In the case of interdisciplinary studies, an attitudinal barrier would be a scholar or researcher who has no interest in collaborating with other disciplines or people.
This is too bad because they can learn so much from another area.
Society needs people to be masters in specific areas because they contribute to the understanding of the world at large.
This is true
The interconnected of life is so complex and massive that it almost seems counterintuitive to teach students single disciplines, completely separated from one another.
We do need disciplines to build off of.
They develop these skills because there is no predetermined curriculum waiting for them when they start their first day of college:
This is only some what true, there are still required classes and gen eds which may not seem relevant to what you are trying to achieve.
. Education is about more than passing a test or being accepted to the “right” school, it’s about self-discovery and personal growth as an individual.
Ive grown a lot since coming to college three years ago
If students are not engaged with a subject because they believe it’s irrelevant, no amount of force will change their minds, or if they do change their minds, the decision comes from outside, not from within.
I can agree with this
they may leave school with an incomplete or inconclusive education.
I completely disagree with this, if students could pick the classes they were interested in, they would be much more likely to stay in school, rather than taking classes that they hate and do not exceed at...this is just setting them up for failure and dropping out.
He believed that a student, by age eighteen, was old enough to select his own courses and pursue his own imagination
This would be true if high school provided the education in independence and learning how to be your own advocate.
Until the industrial revolution, education was dominated by religion and classical texts, exploring questions of morality and a higher truth
I never knew this before taking IDS
Interdisciplinary studies, as a concept, would not be possible without the foundational structure of disciplinary studies.
I find this to be very true since we build upon different disciplines and put them together.
This was weird to think of how they are able to still make a social connection when in competition.
very interesting
Already we see much collaboration in medicine between researchers and doctors, but how much of it is multidisciplinary, rather than interdisciplinary as it should be?
They really should incorporate more.
These universities offered a basic liberal arts degree to educate mostly ministers. Most universities were strictly religious and only accepted students within that particular religion.
I had no clue that universities were built so strongly on a religious basis, I find this very interesting.
gave a speech stating that there is no best method or focus for learning, therefore Harvard will have them all.
I like this idea.
The University of Al-Karaouine in Morocco, Africa is the oldest continuously operating, degree-granting university in the world.
I never would have guessed this. Media makes Africa seem so under-developed compared to everywhere else.
The elder would mentor and guide the adolescent, but it was a one-on-one basis.
I feel like this is a great thing, too bad there isn't more of this today.
As time progressed, universities began to focus their efforts on religion and eventually evolved to where we are today.
This is so interesting since religion isn't even allowed in schools anymore, with the exception of some colleges offering courses to learn about all religions from an unbiased view, only the facts.
interdisciplinarity typically applies to four realms: knowledge, research, education, and theory.
I think bringing these four things together can have so much power when it comes to putting information together comprehensively.
We need to reconceptualize our model of disciplinary growth and specialization, adopting a more organic model that accounts for the intricate links among the many specializations.
I find this really powerful
In some ways, epistemology explains the why of a discipline: why it focuses on certain content and why it chooses the methods that it chooses.
This something I would be interested in integrating into the work I am doing in IDS, I like to know why things are the way they are
Sometimes a discipline’s methods are referred to as methodology.
seems more thorough than the other two alternatives
we may need to break the question up into parts and look at study time, social life, living away from home, economic issues, mental health, oppression, and more. Studying these parts will help us get a sense of the overall reasons for the problem.
I think lower education such as high school does nothing to prepare students for college and you learn everything in your first semester
since breaking a problem or concept down may help us see the different disciplines that are involved, which will then allow us to organize our research approach.
really good way of looking at it
the number of disciplines involved, the “distance” between them, the novelty and creativity involved in combining the disciplinary elements, and their degree of integration.
The world could use more of this and i am actually surprised that we are still going so traditional with education these days, when is it going to reform?
distinctive flavor of each is no longer recognizable
This really is like IDS
A Disciplinary Community grows when practitioners in a common discipline engage in work together. Disciplinary communities might:
waiting for IDS to become the norm
“Interdisciplinarity” is more like a fruit smoothie, where the disciplines are blended together–integrated– to create something new.
Good imagery
Interdisciplinarity: Incorporates several fields of study to allow collaboration among diverse disciplines to either specify or broaden students’ education, to gain understanding, and/or to problem solve.
This is so important, hopefully education will start moving more toward this direction
Unfortunately generalists are not held in high regard on campus or in our society unless they are big names, or else because they became generalists after first earning credibility as specialists.
This is because colleges are not based on general studies in an area but specialties in which people can work in those fields
Clearly we have to re-evaluate our entire system of education for what it is: an 18- year learning continuum that prepares citizens for a life of learning. We must rid it of unnecessary and wasteful duplication, and create coherence and integrity in our curricula.
This has been needed for a long time, hopefully there is some change soon. How do we open the eyes of the decision makers to have them see that our education system is failing all of us?
Unfortunately, many of those student workers say that holding a job hurts their grades, as well as limits their choice of courses.
IDS could give some flexibility to this rather than having a set in stone major where you must take every single class in order to graduate with that degree.
We must reform higher education to reconstruct the unity and value of knowledge.
I think that every single major should be IDS, that way students will be more well rounded and not just learning exactly what they need to do the job, but to bring more diverse information to the workplace
Colleges are becoming academic superstores,
this could not be more true, they are trying to send as many people through college not for the education but for the money
“very important” for them to find work that “will make a positive difference in people’s lives.”
more important than anything, i cant wait to make a difference for someone
For most students, college is a time for self-discovery, for developing passionate interests, and for trying to weave them into a meaningful career.
Currently searching for this
the same process; this study has me standing alone and in this case, that isn’t a bad thing.
I do feel alone since there isn't anyone else doing the same major as me. Sometime I feel that it is hard to find my way and make decisions because those were always laid out in front of me with my past major.
Because at the end of the day, your opinion and your thoughts matter, and you need to make those important to you before they are important to anyone else.
I am learning how to have my own voice and opinion through the use of my new ePort.
In today’s world one of the top aspects an employer will look for when hiring an individual, is creativity
This is what I am skeptical about with IDS. I am concerned that maybe a job won't hire me due to not having a conventional degree. I guess I will have to wait and see.
majoring in Interdisciplinary Studies has given me the confidence to create something of my own that may not be out there yet.
I am excited to see where IDS brings me. It is a completely different way of thinking and learning than my past major and so far it has taken a bit of time to adjust to. I think that this will end up being exactly what I want.
It makes sense when students find ownership in what they choose to create, how they put it online, and how it engages a broader audience.
The idea is the students will feel the freedom to choose what and how they put something online. Hopefully it will empower them to choose a stand on their opinions and become their own person.
public assignments tap into fears of public embarrassment.
People would need to be careful with what they posted, offending the wrong person could cost them a job opportunity. They should be free to write what they would like without the fear of embarrassment or failure.
’ How often do traditional ‘assignments’ misrepresent student interests, passion, and rigor?
This is something that I had not thought of before, but it makes perfect sense. If the assignment is graded, the student may not be able to give their actual opinion, which in turn does take away their freedom on their own personal page.
“To own one’s domain gives students an understanding of how Web technologies work. It puts them in a much better position to control their work, their data, their identity online.”
Having their own web domain lets a person become who they want to be and not just another number associated with a class or school. Having this freedom allows them to show the world what they want and it can give public access to great ideas that may have never been shared otherwise.
To get there, students must be effective architects, narrators, curators, and inhabitants of their own digital lives
This can teach us as students to be so much more creative and independent, rather than just going through the motions of our personal and educational lives.
To get there, students must be effective architects, narrators, curators, and inhabitants of their own digital lives
This can teach us as students to be so much more creative and independent, rather than just going through the motions of our personal and educational lives.
They would play with wikis and blogs; they would tinker and begin to assemble a platform to support their publishing, their archiving, their importing and exporting, their internal and external information connections.
This is the direction the world is going on. It is important that any person going into the work force in the near future knows how to create and manage a web page. This will help with jobs and even self employed workers. If people start learning how to do this now, it will make it like second nature to them so they will not have to worry about falling behind with the technological advances.
Students would have the convenience of one-stop, single-sign-on activities, from registering for classes to participating in online discussion to seeing grades mere seconds after they were posted.
Having the use of school pages, such as Moodle, have made student's lives much easier, but there is another step that can be taken in order to have the students begin to interact more than they can now, such as their own site.
progress means looping back to earlier ideas whose vitality and importance were unrecognized or underexplored at the time, and bringing those ideas back into play in a new context.
This can be so important, especially in a classroom environment. Every single person processes things in a different manner and at a different pace, so it is important to revisit ideas again because maybe someone took longer to understand the topic than others. This can only help solidify ideas and have positive outcomes.
progress means looping back to earlier ideas whose vitality and importance were unrecognized or underexplored at the time, and bringing those ideas back into play in a new context.
This can be so important, especially in a classroom environment. Every single person processes things in a different manner and at a different pace, so it is important to revisit ideas again because maybe someone took longer to understand the topic than others. This can only help solidify ideas and have positive outcomes.
While some schools are turning to social media monitoring firms to keep an eye on students online, rarely do schools give students the opportunity to demonstrate the good work that they do publicly.
I had never thought of this before. It is a taboo that a lot of students put the bad things they are doing on the internet or social media, but never take the time to say the good things about what they have achieved or what they are working on in school. If the internet took a more positive turn, people may have a better outlook.
in turn they begin to have an understanding of the technologies that underpin the Web, including how their work and their data circulate there.
I think it is important to be able to work a web page. Technology is ever growing and it is helpful if it is second nature to students. This also prepares them to make good decisions on what they want their potential employers to see and allows students to come up with their own positive images of themselves and maybe even learn from their mistakes on this issue. For example, many people have not been given a job due to what they have displayed on their social media.
the domain and all its content are the student’s to take with them. It is, after all, their education, their intellectual development, their work.
This is so important. What is the point of students putting in a lot of effort if their work is going to be lost in the end? I think students should have the option to keep their work after they are done with school or the class to use as professional resources in the real world.
It isn’t simply a blog or a bit of Web space and storage at the school’s dot-edu, but their own domain – the dot com (or dot net, etc) of the student’s choosing.
I think that this is a good idea. This way students can have the freedom to choose how they would like to represent themselves. It gives them a bit of choice in the matter. They do not automatically get stuck with an edu site just because they are part of the school, but can choose if they want to be seen as more of a network or commercial poster as well, not just scholarly.
But almost all arguments about student privacy, whether those calling for more restrictions or fewer, fail to give students themselves a voice, let alone some assistance in deciding what to share online.
I think that there should be some middle ground to this topic. For example, older student should be allowed to make some form of decision on how much or how little they want their information online. In other cases, I do not think that younger children should be able to make this decision because they may not fully understand the safety issues at hand with having certain information online, but there really should be some choice.