These issues are typically dealt with in “special” and one-off programmes.
Less of a safe space to open up, and more of a secluded space to keep some issues 'hush hush'.
These issues are typically dealt with in “special” and one-off programmes.
Less of a safe space to open up, and more of a secluded space to keep some issues 'hush hush'.
Oprah’s own attempts to put a stop to the often vicious verbal abuse from particular audience members were largely unsuccessful.
When you have such an urge to change the narrative and change the societal construct with your show and you find yourself feeling stuck I am sure that is one of the most defeating feelings.
In other instances, it seems as if the excessive anger expressed by members of the audience represents a kind of projective identification where they sense something of their own lack of social power in a particular guest and then scapegoat that person.
I think a lot of Americans may have found Oprah's show and her ideals extreme and offensive because of the political and societal differences that have separated our country.
“we, the people, want to know… ,” or “America wants to know …”
Could this be considered too much? As big of a following as her show had, why address the audience, or the "listener" of whatever she is asking as "America"? Or could it be painting a false narrative?
There is no one American Dream.
The "American Dream" is a term that has lost all meaning. I think this and the following sentences do a good idea of expressing how different the meaning of "American Dream" is for marginalized groups.
Her role in giving a platform to people from marginalised groups also falls within these traditions.
Goes to show how committed she was to changing the narrative and shedding light on the struggles of different social groups.
Oprah is also skillful in both creating and sustaining the conditions for listening to these voices.
Oprah was so monumental because she revolutionized the era of daytime talk shows. She was able to maintain such a safe space for viewers, listeners, guests, etc. - her vulnerability and openness led to a shift in her reputation.
Given the relative scarcity of television signals, each of the Big Three would have been broadly successful in the classic era. However, in markets that were fortunate enough to have affiliates of each network, different program types and implied audience enabled each network to carve out its own space within a competitive
This suggests that local market conditions and programming diversity played crucial roles in shaping the success and identity of each network.
In a context whereby three outlets controlled television as a medium, considerable contemporaneous attention was paid to questions regarding the effect of such concentrated access to a national audience and to the type of programming provided by such limited channels.
This suggests a broader societal interest in understanding the implications of concentrated media ownership on national communication and cultural consumption.
network TV had technologically spread across the US continental expanse and while not all Americans could afford, or were able to receive, TV signals, the technology, which followed transportation and communication infrastructures from the nineteenth century, was ostensibly “national.”
The sentence highlights the widespread adoption of network TV technology across the continental United States while acknowledging that not everyone had access due to affordability/reception limitations.
they will go to the nightclub without their husbands
Controversial plot line for the time
evidences the success of that strategy.
She became a beloved character among all viewers
I Love Lucy’s
I think this show is truly genius
This sketch, which involved Lucy cross-dressing as a tramp and doing a vaudeville bit with a trick cello, again makes evident the show's theatrical genealogy
I love the different ways this show was controversial but changed the game for the future of television and female representation
American entertainment television enables dissonant voices to be faintly heard and marginal identities to be momentarily visible, not least because of the fragmentary and experimental stage style which was transferred to the small screen.
This is crucial for the history of television and entertainment
Throughout this first season of I Love Lucy Ball-as-Lucy repeatedly takes to the stage in the show within a show, as if to reiterate the contradiction between sitcom domesticity and the spectacle of vaudeville.
I feel like the stigma around this show is full of so many contradictions
Lucy shows that she can play the masculine role more successfully than the feminine, albeit within a comic structure, where all genders become muddled and violence is funny.
This would be considered controversial for the times - even though people still found her hilarious
During “The Ballet”, however, Ball's performance rematerializes the female body, visibly uncomfortable in her too-short tutu
This is weird
In this episode Lucy
Lucille Ball paved the way for female television presence and female comedy.
one that is fluid in its relation both to narrative and to constructions of authenticity and performance.
Having such a light 'comedy centered' concept for a show that still covers serious social issues.
a wealthy, young French woman, a working-class Italian immigrant girl, a working-class Jewish woman from the East side of New York City, and a German immigrant wife and mother
How was this allowed?
“rebellious, sexual and aggressive comedy”
What fascinates me is the fact that Ball was able to take an already controversial genre of entertainment and still push the boundaries of it.
without their husbands;
Controversial plot line for the time
I Love Lucy offers a range of identification
!!!!!!
evidences the success of that strategy
SHe became a beloved character among all viewers
I Love Lucy’s
I think this show is truly genius
This sketch, whichinvolved Lucy cross-dressing as a tramp and doing a vaudeville bit with a trick cello,again makes evident the show’s theatrical genealog
I love the different ways this show was controversial but changed the game for the future of television and female representation
American entertainment television enables dissonant voices to be faintlyheard and marginal identities to be momentarily visible, not least because of the fragmen-tary and experimental stage style which was transferred to the small screen
This is crucial for the history of television and entertainment
Throughout this first season of I Love Lucy Ball-as-Lucy repeatedlytakes to the stage in the show within a show, as if to reiterate the contradiction betweensitcom domesticity and the spectacle of vaudeville.
I feel like the stigma around this show is full of so many contradictions
Lucy shows that she can play the masculine role more successfully thanthe feminine, albeit within a comic structure, where all genders become muddled and vio-lence is funny.
This would be considered controversial for the times - even though people would still find her hilarious
During “TheBallet”, however, Ball’s performance rematerializes the female body, visibly uncomforta-ble in her too-short tutu
This is weird.
In this episode Luc
Lucille Ball paved the way for female television presence and feminine comedy.
one that is fluid in its relation both to narrative and to constructions ofauthenticity and performance.
Having such a light "comedy centered" concept for a show that still covers serious social issues.
:
What fascinates me is the fact that Ball was able to take an already controversial genre of entertainment and still push the boundaries on it.
a wealthy, young French woman, a working-class Italianimmigrant girl, a working-class Jewish woman from the East side of New York City, and aGerman immigrant wife and mother. T
How was this allowed?