261 Matching Annotations
  1. Mar 2021
    1. Further studies are needed to understand the root causes low recruitment levels, including pollinators and pollination success studies, climate change impact studies, seed and seed bank viability studies, and genetic studies to analyze for potential deleterious effects caused by inbreeding depression.

      Future studies

    2. Low levels of recruitment combined with herbivory on plants and seeds appear to be the largest threats to the natural and experimental populations.

      Largest threats

    3. Whether establishing new populations of Pediocactus knowltonii by transplanting clones or direct seeding can be successfully accomplished has yet to be seen. Natural recruitment to these new populations has been an exceedingly slow process. Overall, it appears that direct seeding large quantities of seeds is more likely to succeed in establishing self-sustaining populations than those started from clones. A population viability analysis might shed some light on what constitutes a viable population and how many plants are needed for successfully establishing a new population.

      Need a PVA as well. Too early to tell if the cactus populations will be successful.

    4. In addition, it would be helpful to know what percentage of Pediocactus knowltonii seeds are viable and therefore contribute to the viability of the seed bank. If a large percentage of seeds are not viable, what is the cause? Lack of pollinators or pollination success? Inbreeding depression? Similarly, whatpercentage of seeds are carried off by seed predators and therefore become lost to the population?

      Future studies should address this.

    5. the percentage of plants in the juvenile size class remains significantly higher in the seed plots over the natural population and transplanted populations. Although this could be an artifact of detection, it is possible that at least some of the original 1994 seeds may continue to contribute to the population of newly recruited individuals in the BLM seed plots.

      Partially could be due to the seed bank. Seed bank viability study is needed, since longevity of seed in seed bank is unknown.

    6. Direct seeding into new locations is a viable alternative to transplanting adult clones. However, only about 5% of the seed becomes established as adult plants and they require a longer period to become reproductive than do transplanted clones. A large quantity of seed is required to ensure adequate germination and establishment. Recruitment from the seedbank remains highest in the seed plots, but in general, seed plot plants are moving towards a natural size class distribution similar to the natural population. After 7 years, the small population in the seed plots at the BLM #1 location was stable with recruitment roughly equal to mortality until 2007 and 2008 which had net declines in number of cacti. Slight increases in numbers from 2009 through 2012 appeared to constitute a small, but stable or growing, population. However, plant numbers dropped sharply in 2015. The subsequent increase in plant numbers and high number of seedlings may be the result of increased spring rainfall in 2015.

      Based on this info it's probably better to do seed plots

    7. Although some new plants have been recorded since 1986, seedlings have rarely been documented and the transplant site continues to retain the lowest percentage of plants in the juvenile age class.

      Probably no a viable solution

    8. uffered a catastrophic decline caused by rodent predation in 2006 and the transplant population was abandoned and judged a failed effort in 2007.

      Navajo lake was abandoned

    9. 27 CONCLUSIONSAlthough the number of Pediocactus knowltonii plants in the monitoring plots fluctuates from year to year, the overall trend after 31 years of monitoring at the type locality is a slow decline and was especially pronounced in 2015. This trend is consistent with other species of Pediocactus monitored on the Colorado Plateau (Clark & Clark 2008, Hazelton 2011, Phillips & Phillips 2004, Roth 2008, USFWS 2012). Declining trends are largely attributed to prolonged drought impacts associated with global climate change. Climate change impacts may include changes in pollinator availability and therefore successful pollination among Pediocactus plants, increase in predation by beetles, rabbits, and rodents, desiccation, decreased reproductive effort and therefore decreased germination and establishment. In addition, climate change is expected to shift ecological functions and timing, including shifts in flowering time, vegetation community changes, and changes in pollinator and herbivore community composition. Increased mortalities may occur during years of higher than usual rainfall due to increased resource competition withseedlings of annual invasive species and increased predation by herbivores due to increases in their population numbers with the availability of additional forage. Although no invasive species were documented at the Sabo Preserve, increased predation is thought to be the primary cause of the decline 2015. The natural population increased in numbers during the late 1980s and early 1990s, and then gradually declined to the lowest point recorded in 2017. It was estimated that the peak population in 1994 would be about 14,000 cacti, if the 1992 estimate of 12,000 plants was accurate (USFWS 2010). By this same 1992 benchmark, the monitoring plot data suggested a total population of only 6,100 cacti in 2008 (Sivinski 2008). A thorough inventory of plants in 2015 found only about half that number at the Sabo Preserve. Additional surveys in suitable habitat to potentially document new natural populations were unsuccessful, supporting our current understanding that the total world population of Pediocactus knowltonii is restricted to one small hill, providing habitat for less than 3,500 plants. This decline is likely a combination of low reproduction and recruitment, influenced by ongoing long-term drought conditions, seed and plant predation from rodents, rabbits, and potentially insects. Other factors contributing to the decline might include small population size and associated inbreeding depression, pollinator availability and pollination success.One serious episode of cactus poaching was detected in 1996 when an entire monitoring plot and an undetermined number of cacti were removed from the natural population at the type locality. No further acts of vandalism have been identified since, although it continues to be a viable threat to Pediocactus knowltonii due to its collection value and overall rarity. After a steady decline of transplants over the initial 10-year period, followed by the loss of 2 transplant sites due to rodent predation, the BLM #1 transplant site appears stable. The multi-stem donor plants in the natural population did not suffer from the loss of a single stem. However, transplanted clones comprise an aging population with little recruitment. These plants are relatively long-lived for small cacti,

      This is an issue with clones: lower recruitment

    10. 27 CONCLUSIONSAlthough the number of Pediocactus knowltonii plants in the monitoring plots fluctuates from year to year, the overall trend after 31 years of monitoring at the type locality is a slow decline and was especially pronounced in 2015. This trend is consistent with other species of Pediocactus monitored on the Colorado Plateau (Clark & Clark 2008, Hazelton 2011, Phillips & Phillips 2004, Roth 2008, USFWS 2012). Declining trends are largely attributed to prolonged drought impacts associated with global climate change. Climate change impacts may include changes in pollinator availability and therefore successful pollination among Pediocactus plants, increase in predation by beetles, rabbits, and rodents, desiccation, decreased reproductive effort and therefore decreased germination and establishment. In addition, climate change is expected to shift ecological functions and timing, including shifts in flowering time, vegetation community changes, and changes in pollinator and herbivore community composition. Increased mortalities may occur during years of higher than usual rainfall due to increased resource competition withseedlings of annual invasive species and increased predation by herbivores due to increases in their population numbers with the availability of additional forage. Although no invasive species were documented at the Sabo Preserve, increased predation is thought to be the primary cause of the decline 2015. The natural population increased in numbers during the late 1980s and early 1990s, and then gradually declined to the lowest point recorded in 2017. It was estimated that the peak population in 1994 would be about 14,000 cacti, if the 1992 estimate of 12,000 plants was accurate (USFWS 2010). By this same 1992 benchmark, the monitoring plot data suggested a total population of only 6,100 cacti in 2008 (Sivinski 2008). A thorough inventory of plants in 2015 found only about half that number at the Sabo Preserve. Additional surveys in suitable habitat to potentially document new natural populations were unsuccessful, supporting our current understanding that the total world population of Pediocactus knowltonii is restricted to one small hill, providing habitat for less than 3,500 plants. This decline is likely a combination of low reproduction and recruitment, influenced by ongoing long-term drought conditions, seed and plant predation from rodents, rabbits, and potentially insects. Other factors contributing to the decline might include small population size and associated inbreeding depression, pollinator availability and pollination success.One serious episode of cactus poaching was detected in 1996 when an entire monitoring plot and an undetermined number of cacti were removed from the natural population at the type locality. No further acts of vandalism have been identified since, although it continues to be a viable threat to Pediocactus knowltonii due to its collection value and overall rarity.

      No serious poaching since 1996

    11. This decline is likely a combination of low reproduction and recruitment, influenced by ongoing long-term drought conditions, seed and plant predation from rodents, rabbits, and potentially insects. Other factors contributing to the decline might include small population size and associated inbreeding depression, pollinator availability and pollination success

      Again, they state factors of decline

    12. Additional surveys in suitable habitat to potentially document new natural populations were unsuccessful, supporting our current understanding that the total world population of Pediocactus knowltonii is restricted to one small hill, providing habitat for less than 3,500 plants

      Total population restricted to small hill

    13. radually declined to the lowest point recorded in 2017. It was estimated that the peak population in 1994 would be about 14,000 cacti,

      Peak and trough of population

    14. the overall trend after 31 years of monitoring at the type locality is a slow decline and was especially pronounced in 2015. This trend is consistent with other species of Pediocactus monitored on the Colorado Plateau (Clark & Clark 2008, Hazelton 2011, Phillips & Phillips 2004, Roth 2008, USFWS 2012). Declining trends are largely attributed to prolonged drought impacts associated with global climate change. Climate change impacts may include changes in pollinator availability and therefore successful pollination among Pediocactus plants, increase in predation by beetles, rabbits, and rodents, desiccation, decreased reproductive effort and therefore decreased germination and establishment. In addition, climate change is expected to shift ecological functions and timing, including shifts in flowering time, vegetation community changes, and changes in pollinator and herbivore community composition.

      Important info!

    15. long-term drought impacts, seed and plant predation, some illegal collecting, and potential impacts from inbreeding depression resulting in low fecundity and therefore declining seed deposits into the seedbank.

      Causes of overall population decline, plus insect and rodent or rabbit herbivory.

    16. In 2005, eleven years following seeding and plot treatment, an analysis of variance for the random block design of this experiment showed no significant differences in the number of plants between plot treatments

      Seems like no treatment is the way to go, since there isn't a significant difference anyway.

    17. The percentage of plants reproducing in the BLM seed plots increased steadily since and even surpassed the percentage of reproducing plants in the natural population between 2005 and 2011. I

      That's good.

    18. he percentage multi-stemmed individuals remains lowest in the seeded plots among the three monitored populations (21% in 2017) (Figure 8).

      Interesting, I wonder what this says about the disturbance in that area.

    19. In 2017, 99 plants were found within all three seed plots (Figure 9). This represents a 14% increase in numbers over the 2016 resultsand is likely associated with germination and establishment in response to increased spring rainfall in 2015 and represents a recovery from the declines observed in 2015. The majority of plants were rated in excellent or good condition (Figure 10)

      It appears that they were successful, since this plot as established about 22 years before

    20. This was likely related to the drought of 2001/2002 in combination with an exhaustion of the artificially stocked seedbank (Figure 1)

      Drought seems to be a major killer for the seed plot

    21. Only 4 of the original 12 survived to be counted again in May 1995. A total of 69 new germinants were counted in the 1995 assessment. The seedlings were not readily visible during the severe drought year of 1996 and a complete assessment was not made during that year.

      Some challenges with the seed plot: very few seeds were successful.

    22. The BLM #1 transplant site was also seriously impacted by predation in 2006 and again in 2007

      Looks like the transplants have had a lot of predation.

    23. Unlike the Navajo #1 & #2 sites, these cacti were planted bare-root and may have lacked the additional anchor of artificial potting soil.

      They fell out due to frost heaving as a result.

    24. The Navajo #1 and #2 transplants slowly dwindled away, without significant recruitment. The entire transplant population catastrophically declined in the winter of 2005/2006, when rodent or rabbit predation killed most of the plants remaining at the Navajo Lake transplant location (Figure 6) (Sivinski 2006).

      These sites were abandoned in 2007, since only 35/352 plants survived. Almost no recruitment was observed.

    25. resulting in a 12 percent rate of mortality from May 1991 to May 1992. During this same period of time, unmolested, multiple-stemmed cacti in adjacent study plots experienced a natural mortality rate of 12.9 percent (N= 101). Therefore, no increase in mortality resulted from the stem damage incurred during the cloning operation

      No increase in mortality was observed.

    26. The Navajo Lake plants were transplanted with the rooting medium still attached to the roots. The BLM #1 transplants were entirely bare-root plantings.

      They are trying two different methods for planting

    27. In September 1991, a total of 149 five-month-old clones where planted on the BLM's Reese Canyon Area of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC), which is referred to as the BLM #1 Site

      Even more transplanted

    28. The reintroduction (transplant) program began in May 1985, when 250 stem cuttings were taken from multi-stem plants at the type locality (Olwell et al. 1987). These clones were taken to a greenhouse and grown in pots over the summer until fully rooted. One hundred fifty of these adult clones were planted at the transplant location adjacent to the Los Pinos arm of Navajo Lake, which is hereafter referred to as the Navajo #1 Site. They were planted in fall of 1985 in a grid pattern at two-meter intervals along 15 lines of ten plants each. This site was supplemented with another 102 cuttings planted on the south side of this grid in the early spring of 1995 (Sivinski 1995). These later transplants are in the same general area, but are referred to as the Navajo #2 Site

      Restoration efforts.

    29. The majority of individuals are young, reproducing adults, with a diameter of 1.1 to 2.0 cm ( 36% in 2017) (Figure 8). In 2017 approximately 11% of all plants in the natural population were juvenile, non-reproducing plants less than 1.0 cm in diameter (excluding seedlings).

      Common morphological/reproductive trends

    30. The highest number of seedlings recorded was in 2017 (16 seedlings). It is likely that the germination and establishment of these seedlings are the result of the high rainfalls in 2015, or possibly the results of higher than average rainfall in the winter of 2016/2017. However, recruitment continues to lag significantly behind mortality in the natural population throughout the monitoring years

      Recruitment high rn, but still lagging behind mortality. Only recorded seedlings since like 2012.

    31. Prolonged drought conditions and the associated lower levels of reproduction and recruitment are generally considered the likely driving force behind the decline of this population. In addition, dry conditions can cause an increase in rabbit and rodent attacks, which are frequently fatal.

      Causes of current decline

    32. In 2015, only 138 plants were found within the ten monitoring plots. This represents the sharpest decline in the number of plants documented since 1984 and a 37% decline from 2014 when 219 plants were found in the 10 monitoring plots.

      Huge decline

    33. A similar drought during 2001/2002 is considered the main cause of a steep decline in plant numbers in 2002 (Figures 2 & 4). The number of plants found in the monitoring plots decreased by 25% from 2001 to 2002

      Another cause of steep decline

    34. The dry winter of 1995 to 1996 corresponded to a steep decline in plant numbers, which dropped by 27% within one year(Figures 2 & 4).

      This is one reason why these die offs are occuring.

    35. ave dropped significantly in 2015 (37% over 2014 numbers), with only a slight increase documented in 2016, followed by an additional decline in 2017 (11% over 2016 numbers).

      More recent trends.

    36. Although the population trend initially increased by 78% between 1986 and1994, it has decreased since 1995 to a number significantly below the original 1986 density

      Important data

    37. verall, the number of juvenile and adult plants within the 10 monitoring plots at the type locality has been declining over the past 31 years and reached an all-time low in 2017 (Figure 4).

      Important conclusion.

    38. Annual monitoring is conducted during the first 2 weeks of May at Type Locality/Natural Population:1.the TNC Sabo Preserve (1986 to present)Transplant Sites:2.the BLM #1 Transplant Site (1991 – present), 3.the BLM #1 Seed Plots Site (1994 – present)

      Two transplant/seed plots established, 1 natural population

    39. The average annual precipitation at Aztec National Monument ( ca. 25 miles SW of the type locality) is approximately 11 inches, ranging from approximately 3 to 20 inches over a 97-yearperiod (WRCC 2018) (Figure 1).

      Include?

    40. This small cactus has contractile roots, which can pull the entire plant below the soil surface during periods of severe drought

      Very interesting feature of this plant

    41. a peak in 1994 at 17% higher than 1992. Therefore, the natural population was estimated at about 14,000 cacti in 1994 and has been gradually and steadily declining since then.

      Peak:1994

    42. . A reintroduction program into nearby suitable habitats was identified as the primary effort towards recovery of this species.

      Main recovery effort... Should look more deeply into this.

    43. In an effort to protect the only natural population of this rare cactus, the original landowner (Public Service Company of New Mexico) donated the 10-hectare type locality to The Nature Conservancy (TNC).

      Important information.

    44. his population was severely impacted by the New Mexico Cactus and Succulent Society in 1960, which was under the mistaken perception that this site would be flooded by the newly constructed Navajo Reservoir (USFWS 1985). Field trips were organized to salvage the cacti from the type locality. Several thousand Pediocactusknowltonii plants were reportedly taken by this group of hobbyists

      This group is primarily responsible...

    45. Pediocactus knowltonii L. Benson (Knowlton's cactus) is one of the rarest cacti in the United States. It was discovered in 1958 by the late Fred Knowlton and named by Lyman Benson in 1961. It was listed endangered by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) on October 29, 1979 (44 FR 62244).

      These are all things that I should have in my paper.

    1. To help design an optimal management plan, we used demographic data from a 5-year fieldstudy of H. montana—which included a controlled burn—to construct size-based population projection matri-ces. Using these matrices, we projected the consequences of instituting controlled burns and hiking and camp-ing restrictions separately and in tandem. We also determined the burn frequency that would maximize H.montana’s population growth rate. Finally, we used a stochastic model to determine how environmental fluc-tuations could alter the efficacy of conservation measures.

      Major goal

    2. A two-pronged manage-ment strategy is more apt to succeed in part becauseburning makes cliff-side habitat more accessible to hikersand campers.

      This would offset benefits from burning

    3. ur results suggest that management strategies that in-tegrate controlled burning with trampling reduction holdmore promise. Combining the two management tacticscould yield a deterministic growth rate of 1.0152 and an88.75% chance that the H. montana population willgrow over the next 200 years

      Promising

    4. oth controlled burns and trampling reduction can slowH. montana’s decline, but neither strategy by itself is suf-ficient to produce a growing H. montana population.

      I don't understand how they can totally conclude this when their stochastic model doesn't confirm this statement.

    5. When combined, these two management tacticsyield higher population growth rates than either manage-ment tactic alone.

      Even though the stochastic model did not say it was totally necessary, they recommend burning.

    6. The stochastic model also predicted thatH. montana populations would increase without burn-ing if trampling were eliminated, whereas the determinis-tic model did not. The higher population growth rates inour stochastic model support speculation (Frost 1990)that the occasional benefits of wet years are essential tomaintaining viable H. montana populations.

      This conflicts with deterministic model. I wonder whether this will effect the management strategies they suggest, since stochastic model shows burning is not necessary for population growth. Stochastic model has higher growth rates, probably because the species benefits from occasional wet years.

    7. Contrary to the deterministic model, thestochastic model predicted that H. montana populationgrowth was possible with only a 50% reduction in tram-pling mortality.

      Stochastic model (but not deterministic) predicts that 50% reduction of trampling would be sufficient.

    8. Controlled burning at short and intermediateintervals caused an increase in the proportion of individ-uals in the three larger size classes, whereas burning atlong intervals produced only a minor shift in the stablesize distribution

      Reproductive value of these plants increases with size, so this is good.

    9. Both models predicted that combining high lev-els of trampling reduction with burn cycles of intermedi-ate length would offer the most effective managementstrategy.

      Big conclusion

    10. 1298Conservation Models for H. montanaGross et al.Conservation BiologyVolume 12, No. 6, December 1998(z10%) higher sensitivities to changes in uncertain param-eters than did l for the control matrix. In no case did a 1%perturbation of an uncertain parameter change the opti-mal burn frequency for a given level of trampling control.Stochastic ModelThe stochastic model predicted effects of burning andtrampling reduction similar to those predicted by the de-terministic model. Greater trampling reduction increasedthe average population growth rate (Fig. 2b) and the frac-tion of simulations with growing populations (Fig. 5).With reductions in trampling mortality, population growthrates were maximized at intermediate burn frequenciesthat roughly coincided with the optimal burn frequenciespredicted by the deterministic model

      Basically, same thing as deterministic model.

    11. Annual population growth rate as a func-tion of burn cycle length and trampling reduction for deterministic (a) and stochastic (b) models. In (a) solid lines are asymptotic rates and dashed lines show average annual populatio

      Benefits appear to be maximized at about 4 year burn length for deterministic and 5 year burn length in stochastic with total elimination of trampling. Populations will continue to decline without trampling reduction and regular burns.

    12. Conservation BiologyVolume 12, No. 6, December 1998Gross et al.Conservation Models for H. montana1297was eliminated entirely.

      Population growth only possible when trampling is eliminated entirely

    13. the benefits of burning are maximized whenthe interim between burns is long enough to permit fullH. montana recovery yet not long enough to allow L.buxifolium to recover as well.

      This is why they observed 5-8 years maximized benefit/growth.

    14. For all three levelsof trampling reduction, population growth rates peakedat burn cycle durations of 5–8 years and asymptoticallyapproached the control growth rate as burn frequencydecreased

      Great data

    15. Although both controlled burns and reduction in tramplingmortality increased H. montana’s population growth rate,neither tactic was sufficient by itself to produce a grow-ing H. montana population

      Major conclusion

    16. Specifically,we projected H. montana’s population growth rate un-der management plans incorporating either controlledburns, trampling reduction, or both. We also modeled theresponse of H. montana populations to a range of burnfrequencies. Because environmental fluctuations signifi-cantly affect the shrub’s demographic rates, we con-structed two complementary models: a deterministicmodel for tractable analysis of the effects of managementtactics and a stochastic model to explore the impact of acapricious environment on management success.

      This is a good summary of their experimental methods.

    17. First, what might be the relative contributions ofcontrolled burns and trampling reduction in aiding re-covery of H. montana? Are both tactics necessary, orcould one or the other suffice?

      This is the overarching question of the paper. Previous research has shown that competition with L. buxifolium is reduced by fire, since it experienced higher mortality and took longer to recover than H. montana. Drought and competition and trampling, in that order, were the highest cause of H. montana mortality. They argue that burning could make more area accessible to hikers, therby increasing trampling. They want to know how long it takes for H montana to recover from fire without allowing L buxifolium time to re-establish competitive dominance.

    Annotators

    1. There are norelevant conservation units in this region. The highgenetic diversity and uniqueness found in these popula-tions ofD. nigra, plus evidence from animal studies(Ditchfield, 2000; Costa, 2003; Moraes-Barroset al., 2006;Tchaickaet al., 2007), indicate the high priority thatshould be given to implementing conservation units innortheast Minas Gerais

      Major conclusion overall.

    2. These genetic data, high-lighting the uniqueness of populations in each phylogeo-graphic group must also be considered upon samplingseeds for theex situconservation ofD. nigra

      Ex situ conservation should take into account the genetic diversity of these areas.

    3. The populations RDO and VRD, located in largeconservation units in the SG1 group, are among thosethat most contributed to the total diversity ofD. nigra.This fact shows the importance of preserving large areasto maintain genetic diversity.

      They are suggesting that the large groups should be especially conserved.

    4. These molecular data areevidence that timber exploration and deforestation havepromoted genetic depletion in this species, and also thatthe present diversity may represent only a part of thegenetic diversity seen in the past in this wide geogra-phical area of the Atlantic Forest. This scenario found forD. nigracould probably be extended to other timberspecies of the Atlantic Forest.

      Genetic diversity has been greatly reduced in these areas.

    5. can be suggestedthat the northernmost populations (NG and SG1)maintained large populations during a great periodand that the SG2 may have undergone a morepronounced bottleneck.

      effective population size differences reveal that SG2 could have undergone a population bottleneck.

    6. Furthermore, the NG andSG1 showed higher effective population sizes than theSG2. Because the effective size is a harmonic average ofthe effective size across generation

      effective population size in this context means what?

    7. hat is, after the splitthere were population expansions. The NG and SG1exhibited high diversities (Table 3), whereas the south-ernmost group (SG2) had low diversity, as expected for arecently founded population.

      SG2 was recently founded perhaps, while NG and SG1 are more longstanding.

    8. These datashowed that the drier conditions of the LGM causedthe Atlantic Forest to become much smaller and morefragmented than it is today (Behling, 2002). As a result ofthis constriction, the rain forest was probably partlyreplaced by semi-deciduous forest in southeastern Braziland by semi-deciduous forest and caatinga (tropicalsemi-desert shrub vegetation) in northeast Brazil (Behl-ing, 1998, 2002). A palynological study in the region ofthe split region between the Doce and Jequitinhonharivers, performed by Behling (1995) in Lago do Pires(171590S, 421130W) showed that this region in the earlyHolocene was dominated by species from Cerrado (theBrazilian savannah), suggesting the occurrence of longdry seasons. This study also suggested that the currentdense and closed semi-decidous forest in this region wasonly established in the latest Holocene (beginning 970years ago). The recurrence of climatic changes during thePleistocene in the central part of the Atlantic forest, withcycles of forest expansion and contraction, likely led torepeated vicariance events and thus resulted in thegenetic differentiation of the three population groups ofD. nigra. In fact, the location of the current NG group isincluded in the putative Bahia refugium, a large stableregion from the Doce River northward to the southernborder of the Sa ̃o Francisco River described by Carnava

      This is the description of the historical vicariance;

    9. Considering only the genetic divergences among thegroups, the estimated divergence times between the NGand SG1 groups and between the SG1 and SG2 groupswere similar (351 000 and 389 000 ybp, respectively). Weapplied the IM analysis taking into account demographicevents because of possible differences in the effectivepopulation sizes between populations and gene flowafter split. This analysis showed a more ancient separa-tion time between these groups, 612 000 ybp (NG/SG1groups) and 784 000 ybp (SG1/SG2). In spite of thedifferences between the estimates with the two ap-proaches, both are concordant in pointing to vicarianceevents in the Middle Pleistocene.

      Though they are different, the two predictions show vicariance events in the Middle Pleistocene.

    10. D. nigra, between the SG1 and SG2 groups, was locatedaround 211S, in the same region of separation betweengenetic groups found in another two legume trees,Caesalpinia echinata(Liraet al., 2003) andHymenaeacourbaril(Ramoset al., 2009). However, in thePodocarpusspecies (Ledruet al., 2007), the separation among thethree groups appears not to coincide with the split zonesfound in legume trees. These latitudinal genetic disjunc-tions found in different groups of species point tohistorical vicariance events in the central Atlantic Forest.

      There was a historic geogrphic factor that caused a split, which I guess is not there any more.

    11. The genetic splitseparating the NG and SG1 groups ofD. nigrawas foundaround 18oS latitude, between the Jequitinhonha andDoce rivers, coinciding with the split zone range foundin several animal species

      River divides them, as in animal species

    12. identified as threephylogeographical groups, the northern (NG), southern1 (SG1) and southern 2 (SG2) groups (Figure 2)

      These geographic patterns differentiated the different groups

    13. he divergence time betweenthe main groups, NG and SG1, was estimated at612 595 ybp (lower bound of HPD 90% interval:372 137). The two groups of southern region, SG1 andSG2, diverged earlier, at 784 351 ybp (lowe

      Another estimate of divergence

    14. NG and SG1diverged approximately 351 000 years before the present(ybp) (CI¼323 092–1 025 072). The time of divergencebetween SG1 and SG2 (dA¼0.00079; T¼389 000 ybp;CI¼400 538–1 178 953) was similar to that between NGand SG1

      This is the WHEN of their paper. Evolutionary history

    15. abbreviations and molecular diversity indexes. The median-joining network analysis is represented on the upper left. The size of each circle

      You can see that certain haplotypes are restricted to certain regions

    16. TheNST(0.649±0.0624;Po0.05)was significantly higher than theGST(0.559±0.0690),indicating a phylogeographic structure, that is, closelyrelated haplotypes in theD. nigrapopulations werefound more often in the same area than less closelyrelated haplotypes.

      Part of the major findings.

    17. he multiple regression analysis indicated that ap-proximately 69% of the variation (R-squared) in thegenetic distances could be predicted by the geographicallocation (partial correlation coefficient¼0.463,Po0.01)and the linear geographical distance among localitypairs (partial correlation coefficient¼0.689,Po0.01).This result indicates that both vicariance processes andisolation by distance explain the present-day geneticstructure ofD. nigra.

      Don't know WTH vicariance is.

    18. the Monmonier algorithm (BARRIERpro-gram) suggested the following main barriers to gene flowin theD. nigradistribution range: (1) one barrier locatedapproximately in the northeast of Minas Gerais andsouth of Bahia, dividing the natural distribution of thisspecies into northern and southern groups, and (2)another barrier located between Espirito Santo and Riode Janeiro, thus isolating theD. nigrapopulations locatedin the extreme south of the sampling area (Figure 2).

      Here they determine some things which may have caused a barrier to gene flow and differentiation.

    19. The AMOVA analysis showed a very strong differ-entiation among allD. nigrapopulations (FST¼0.624,Po0.0001). In theSAMOVAanalysis, the best groupingscheme divided the distribution range ofD. nigrai

      More data you might understand (FST indicates strong differentiation amoiund all D. nigra populations...

    20. The comparisonof the genetic diversities of populations from smallfragments (TOT, SCR, DIO, ACA, PMI and VNI) withthose from large reserve areas (RDO and VRD; Figure 2),both pertaining to same geographical group (see belowthe results ofSAMOVAprogram), showed significantlylower genetic diversities in all estimates in the smallfragments, such ash(t¼6.57,Po0.001),p(t¼8.57,Po0.001) andHr(t¼8.13,Po0.001).

      This may be some data you understand...

    21. (1) What is the influence of the historical events of thePleistocene on the current genetic diversity and structureofD. nigra, and specifically, are there genetic disjunctionsalong its distribution? (2) In addition to historical events,were the genetic diversities of populations affected byhuman-mediated fragmentation?

      These are the questions that they pose for the paper.

    22. studies that take into account bothof the factors that affect the current genetic structure ofspecies—historical and human-mediated events—arerequired to better understand the evolutionary processand establish effective conservation measures

      Another reason why they are doing this study

    23. Additional phylogeographic studieswould help to reconstruct the evolutionary history ofthe central Atlantic Forest, improving conservation andmanagement measures such as the identification ofpriority populations/areas for reserve implementation.

      This is why they are doing the study: these are the practical implications.

    24. Although thestudies in plants have attributed these genetic splits toclimatic changes of the Quaternary, none has estimatedthe time since splitting.

      Potential cause of splitting, but noone has estimated when this occured.

    25. Based on comparisons among thepopulations of large reserves and small, disturbed fragments ofthe same phylogeographic group, we also found evidence ofrecent anthropogenic effects on genetic diversity. The resultswere also analysed with the aim of contributing to theconservation ofD. nigra. We suggest that the three phylogeo-graphic groups could be considered as three distinct manage-ment units. Based on the genetic diversity and uniqueness ofthe populations, we also indicate priority areas for conservation.Heredity(2011)106,46–57;doi:10.1038/hdy.2010.64;published online 2 June 2010

      Findings and conclusion of the paper

    Annotators

  2. Feb 2021
    1. making them more susceptible to stand-­‐replacing fires which can lead to novel ecosystems on new successional trajectories away from historical stand characteristics

      This is how fire frequency is changing.

    2. ver a century of fire suppression in warm/dry mixed conifer forests has shifted species composition toward more mesic, shade tolerant species such as white fir and Douglas-­‐fir, increased tree density, and increased surface and aerial fuels

      These are changes which have resulted

    3. Historically, fires in cool/moist mixed conifer forests burned at sub-­‐decadal to century frequency with a mixed-­‐severity fire regime, where surface and crown fire behavior could occur during the same fire event (Margolis and Balmat, 2009; Romme et al., 2009).

      Frequency

    4. Surface fires were frequent before the mid to late 1800s depending on the site, burning with multi-­‐to sub-­‐decadal frequencyin the warm/dry mixed conifer

      Here is the fire frequency

    1. The root samples were placed into a 2-ml screw-cappropylene tube together with two tungsten carbide balls (3 mm) andground (3 min, 13,000 rpm) using a mixer mill (MM 400; Retsch, Haan,Germany).

      something like this would be nice...

    2. when the conditions are favorable (rainy periods duringwinter and spring)

      Conditions won't be favorable for my study, less diversity will probably be present.

    3. The application of molecular techniques in recent years toidentity AMF in the field, particularly in plant roots, has revealeda high diversity, including many sequences that cannot be relatedto known taxa (19,30)

      look at these citations

    4. Previous studies have revealed that AMFstimulate the growth of shrubs and improve their drought toler-ance (15,33), while at the same time, the shrubs exert a selectivepressure on the AMF species

      They must exert selective pressures on each other.

    1. Rarefaction curves showed that the number of sequences inthe 12 samples obtained from coconut roots was sufficient toasymptote, indicating that an acceptable mycorrhizal richnesswas recovered

      I need to do this, it seems very important

    2. Mycorrhizae also promote plant growth and leadto differential effects in growth rates in coconut seedlings, aswell as suppressing plague infections, depending on the AMFspecies

      This is incredible

    3. nd are considered among the most ecologically im-portant soil microorganisms due to the role they play inecosystem functionality, increasing plant biomass and im-proving resistance to moderate salinity and hydric stress aswell as tolerance to some pathogens

      This is why AM fungi are important

    4. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) belong to the sub-phylumGlomeromycotina, in the phylumMucoromycota(Spatafora et al.2016). Species of this group are associatedwith the roots of over 80% of land p

      This is important information

    5. rhizosphere soil

      Hiltner described the rhizosphere as the area around a plant root that is inhabited by a unique population of microorganisms influenced, he postulated, by the chemicals released from plant roots. In the years since, the rhizosphere definition has been refined to include three zones which are defined based on their relative proximity to, and thus influence from, the root (Figure 1). The endorhizosphere includes portions of the cortex and endodermis in which microbes and cations can occupy the "free space" between cells (apoplastic space). The rhizoplane is the medial zone directly adjacent to the root including the root epidermis and mucilage. The outermost zone is the ectorhizosphere which extends from the rhizoplane out into the bulk soil.

    6. The diversity and community structure of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) associated with coconut (Cocos nucifera)rootswas evaluated by next generation sequencing (NGS) using partial sequences of the 18S rDNA gene

      I like how this is phrased...

    Annotators

    1. No indicator species of known EM fungi wereidentified for the burned sites in either range or for the unburnedareas in the Santa Catalina Mts.

      Let's do indicator species analysis

    2. Species accumulation curves (Fig. S2) indicate that oursampling captured the majority of EM fungal species in sites rep-resenting each range and the recent history offire

      I should do this! It seems like an important way to justify my data

    3. EM fungi known from indi-vidual ranges may be lost as these insular forests experience morefrequent and more intense wildfires

      There may be species loss due to specialization, which I don't think we can know the effects of. But it has been shown that species diversity actually supports plant health.

    4. These forests, sub-ject to drought, warming temperatures, andfire, have the potentialto complement studies conducted in California and the PacificNorthwest for a broader understanding of EM responses tofire inPonderosa pine forests

      OK, this is something that makes my research more important-- broader scale implications.

    5. However, in isolated forests or for-est fragments, the capacity to recolonize from less- or undamagedforests may be restricted.

      Will this impact the study site?

    6. However, more intense and frequentfires can destroy the viable spore bank, hindering re-establishmentof fungal communities and subsequent recolonization by pines andother tree species

      I wonder if this happened in severe areas of the fire. How could this impact those areas?

    7. Afterfire, remnant communities of EM fungioften are dominated by species from the spore bank, which usuallyare disturbance-adapted and poor competitors

      This is related to what the other paper saw in EM fungi-- phylogenetic clustering results from forest fire.

    8. Such organisms include soil-inhabiting fungi,which play an integral role in forest health, productivity, andresilience to environmental stress

      This is why they are important

    Annotators

    1. availability of coop-erative plant hosts and stabilization of the soil chemistryprompts the recovery of mycorrhizal community com-position and phylogenetic structure

      Soil chemistry and abundance of hosts will help determine structure. I think it's good it's 3 years post fire, it's kind of an intermediate zone

    2. Prior work has shown how AMF com-munities are surprisingly resilient to disturbance and canrecover quickly in the absence of dispersal, which sug-gests the presence of a local‘microbial seed bank’

      Interesting! They may have an innoculated seed bank?

    3. AMF community resilience depends on thepost-fire regrowth of understory vegetation and the sub-sequent recovery of soil chemical properties

      This makes sense

    4. Shannon index andevenness were positively correlated with herbaceousbiomass and shrubby biomass, and negatively correlatedwith AP and NH4+(P<0.05 in all cases; Fig.4;TableS6). Similarly, VT richness was positively corre-lated with herbaceous biomass and shrubby biomass,and negatively correlated with AP, NH4+and pH

      This highlights the help that having a diversity of species gives.

    5. AMF communities were phylogeneti-cally clustered

      a group of closely related species shares a trait, or suite of traits, that allow them to persist in a given habitat

    6. Fire greatly reduced the abundance ofDiversisporaceaeand increased the abundance ofAcaulosporaceae, while the relative abundances ofthese taxa returned to a similar level as found in thecontrols after 11 years

      This is what i expect to see

    7. Mean nearest taxon distance(MNTD) (Webb2000) was calculated to evaluate theeffect of fire on the AMF phylogenetic structure usingthe picante package

      I should do this.

    8. The relationships between the alpha-diversity and geo-chemical features were assessed with linear regressionanalyses using SPSS 20 for Windows.

      DO THIS

    9. ), poor-quality (below an av-erage quality score of 25) and short (<200 bp) sequenceswere removed and sequences were demultiplexed.Sequences were clustered into OTUs (operational taxo-nomic units) using a 97 % identity threshold (defaultQIIME settings) by UCLUST (Edgar2010 ). The mostabundant sequence within each cluster was selected asthe representative sequence for that OTU. To assign theOTUs to AMF virtual taxa (VT), sequences were blast-ed against the MaarjAM Glomeromycota database(Öpik et al.2010 ), which correspond to a similarity≥97 %. We rarified the abundance matrix to 280 se-quences per sample to obtain relative abundances. Thenon-AMF sequences were assigned to OTUs (97 %identity)

      Consider doing these things

    10. Understory vegetation was assessed in five 2×2 mareas, one in the center and four at the corners of the40×40 m plot.

      I should probably do this.

    11. All the samples were sieved, thor-oughly mixed and divided into two parts: one part wasstored at 4 °C for biogeochemical analysis; the other wasstored at−40 °C for DNA analysis.

      I could use this route...

    12. how do wildfires of varying intensityalter soil AMF community composition, diversity, andphylogenetic structure

      This is basically the same question as I have.

    13. After a fire, AMF communities likely help me-diate the physical stabilization of soils, the recovery ofdamaged plants, and the recruitment of new vegetation

      This is why AMF fungi are important in this context

    14. ). Microbescan be killed directly by heat, or indirectly by shifts insoil chemistry and vegetation. In addition, wildfire dis-turbance affects soil microbial phylogenetic structure(Ferrenberg et al.2013). For example, some studieshave reported that disturbance promotes phylogeneticoverdispersion (Didham et al.2005; Didham andNorton2006 ), which may indicate increased competi-tion among related taxa with overlapping niches

      "If competition affects community membership, then species in a community will be more distantly related than expected by chance" If, conversely, community membership is determined by habitat filtering, the species within a community will be more closely related than expected by chance (phylogenetic clustering; Webb et al. 2002). Finally, if community assembly is not strongly influenced by phylogeny, or if multiple factors oppose and nullify each other, community lists will be randomly assembled with respect to phylogeny (Helmus et al. 2007).https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2008.0420

    15. . Previous studies haveshown how wildfire reduces belowground microbialbiomass (Stendell et al.1999;Vernesetal.2004;Wang et al.2012), mycorrhizal fungal root-colonization

      Fire has been shown to reduce mycorrhizal colonization/ bacterial diversity.

    16. Fires oftenmineralize a significant fraction of soil organic matter(Choromanska and Deluca2001 ; Fernández et al.1997 )and reduce plant nutrient uptake (Smithwick et al.2009), resulting in a pulse of ammonium (inorganicNH4+) and available phosphorus (AP) (Neary et al.1999 ; Certini2005 ; Wang et al.2012 ). The reactivecharcoal layer left behind by wildfire can influencemany other soil properties, like pH and C availability(Wardle et al.1998 ;DeLucaandSala2006 ). Wildfiresalter the vegetation structure by selectively killingsmall-diameter trees and enhancing the growth ofgrasses

      These are the impacts of fire on soil chemistry and plant nutrient uptake.

    Annotators

    1. using a wide range of methods, including comparative sequence analysis, site-directed mutagenesis, genetics, mRNA profiling, co-immunoprecipitation, and proteomics, have repeatedly shown that perfect pairing to miRNA nucleotides 2–7, known as the miRNA seed, is important for the recognition of many if not most miRNA targets3. To impart more than marginal repression of mammalian targets, this seed pairing is usually augmented by either a match to miRNA nucleotide 8 (7mer-m8 site)4–7 or an A across from nucleotide 1 (7mer-A1 site)4,7 or by both (8mer site)4,7. In relatively rare instances, targeting also occurs through 3′-compensatory sites4,5,8 and centered sites9, for which substantial pairing outside the seed region compensates for imperfect seed pairing.A single miRNA can target hundreds of distinct mRNAs through seed-matched sites10. Indeed, most human mRNAs are conserved regulatory targets8, and many additional regulatory interactions occur through nonconserved sites11–13. However, not every site is effective; 8-nucleotide sites are more often effective than 7-nucleotide sites, which are more often effective than 6-nucleotide sites7,14. Another factor is site context. For example, sites in the 3′UTRs are more often effective than those in the path of the ribosome7. Among 3′UTR sites, those away from the centers of long UTRs and those within high local A–U sequence context are more often effective7, consistent with reports that sites predicted to be within more accessible secondary structure tend to be more effective15–19. Also influencing site efficacy is proximity to other miRNA-binding sites7,20, to protein-binding sites21, and to sequences that can pair to the 3′ region of the miRNA, particularly nucleotides 13–17 (ref 7).Studies of site efficacy have focused primarily on different sites to the same miRNA, without systematic investigation of whether some miRNA sequences might be intrinsically more proficient at targeting than others. Broadly conserved miRNAs typically have many more conserved targeting interactions than do other miRNAs4,8, and highly or broadly expressed miRNAs appear to target more mRNAs than do others22, but these phenomena reflect evolutionary happenstance more than intrinsic targeting proficiency.Our interest in targeting proficiency was spurred by intriguing results regarding the lsy-6 miRNA. When tested in C. elegans, only one of 14 predicted targets with 7–8-nucleotide seed-matched sites responds to lsy-6, which was interpreted to show that perfect seed-pairing is not a generally reliable predictor for miRNA–target interactions23. An alternative interpretation, which seemed more parsimonious with findings for many other miRNAs in other contexts3, is that the results for lsy-6 might not be generally applicable to other miRNAs because lsy-6 might have unusually high targeting specificity because of unusually low targeting proficiency.

      Is this the crux of their paper or are they just talking about other data? I think they are setting this up so that miRNA lys-6, and therefor other miRNAs, can have a low targeting proficiency.

    1. n some cases, there hasbeen evidence that post-fire forest management techniques can createadditional site disturbance and enhance post-fire runoff, erosion, andsediment delivery to streams

      Looks like the strategies they are using make it worse...

    2. Common post-fire forest manage-ment approaches include salvage logging, emergency stabilization, sub-soiling (cutting furrows along the contour of hillslopes), contour-felledlogs, application of straw wattle to hillslopes, and seeding or replantingof hillslopes

      I did not know this.

    3. The high degree of variabilityin the longevity and trajectory of the recovery curve is, in part, due tothe complexity of many interacting factors, including fire severity,catchment physiography, vegetation composition and regrowth, soils,geology, climate, site disturbance history, and post-fire land manage-ment (

      I think that it is interesting that these factors all effect recovery of an ecosystem after fire.

    4. Balfour,

      I think that this is very interesting, since this could potentially effect microbial symbiosis: I bet that plants are going to need them even more.

    Annotators

  3. Jan 2021
    1. The TRAPPI complex was unable to catalyze Ypt31/32 activation, suggesting that TRAPPII-specific subunits may contact Ypt31/32 to enable nucleotide exchange.

      There are different subunits which specificallyactivate certain RABs

    2. TRAPPII activates Ypt31/32 via the same active site residues used by TRAPPI to activate Ypt1, representing a remarkable case of active site plasticity

      Why wouldn't TRAPI preform the functions of TRAPII if it's active sites residues are conserved? What then is the need for both proteins?

    3. Three innovations distinguish our approach from previous investigations of TRAPPII activity: (1) we used synthetic liposome membranes to provide proper biological context; (2) we purified recombinant TRAPPII (rTRAPPII) from bacteria to avoid copurification of endogenous contaminants; and (3) we used enzymatic synthesis to generate native prenylated-Rab/GDP dissociation inhibitor (GDI) complex substrates.

      Wow, very innovative.

    4. In all of these studies, the observed TRAPPII GEF activity toward Ypt31/32 appeared low, likely because soluble Rab substrates were used, whereas in cells Rab GTPase activation occurs at the membrane surface of target organelles.

      I appreciate that you seem to have a very innovative and holistic approach to your research, considering that you take into account the environment of these proteins-- near the membrane.

    1. While the cause is unknown, itmight be the result of ectopic expression ofBdRAM1target genes and/or perhaps an interference of RAM1with other GRAS transcriptional networks, many ofwhich regulate development

      RAM1 might influence GRAS transcriptional networks, some of which influence development which will acount for the phenotypic differences

    2. hefinding thatB. distachyon ram1can support somefull arbuscule development suggests that other proteinsor pathways have the potential to compensate for lossofBdRAM1function.

      Why wouldn't this have happened in all of the cells? Why only a few? Is it because of absence of this gene in a particular cell type?

    3. Arbuscules areephemeral structures, and the few arbuscules that areformed indellamutants display an increased lifespan,indicating that DELLA not only regulates arbusculeformation but also their degradation (

      DELLA helps degrade arbuscules... What the heck is the advantage of this?

    4. pproaches to increase the density of symbiotic interfaces will require a more focused, potentially cell type specificmanipulation of transcription factor gene expression.

      Is this feasible, since it might require manipulation of many factors?

    5. However, the overexpressors also showaltered expression of hormone biosynthesis genes and aberrant growth patterns, including stunted bushy shoots and poor seedset

      Why does this happen? What specifically is causing this phenotype?

  4. Oct 2020
    1. confers

      The DENV 5' UTR was engineered upstream of Gluc, but not fluc. Fluc experienced decreased translation levels, which serves as evidence that the 5' UTR is responsible for recruiting the ribosome. It appears that the DENV 5' UTR promotes translation even more effectively than the positive control, so the IRES activity must be very robust. This activity appears to be independent of the 3' UTR since it's presence does not increase levels of Gluc. qRT-PCR was used to confirm that stable viral RNA levels in transfected cells were at approximately equivalent

      These results are important because they suggest noncononical translation activity is occuring in the presence of the DENV 5' UTR. This would mean that viral proteins are likely produced by cap independent translation.

    2. As we have implied above, another intriguing puzzle to be solved is atwhat stage in evolution one group of theFlaviviridaedecided to restrict regulation oftranslation to a specific mechanism at the expense of another mechanism, and why?

      This is a very interesting question.

    3. Xrn-1

      Xrn-1 is an RNA digestive enzyme which degrades uncapped mRNA indiscriminately. It is probably wrecking their uncapped constructs, leading to selection in favor of RNAs protected by a cap structure.

    4. was strong under the control of the intergenic ZIKV or DENV 5=-UTRs

      ZIKV also preforms cap independent translation using it's 5' UTR which appears to harbor IRES activity.

    5. 6Noncapped

      It is interesting that the viral titers for this experiment were not significantly different since in their earlier experiments with DENV modifications had a significant impact on translation. Apparently ZIKV can replicate just as well in mamallian cells as it can in insect cell.

    6. Theresults showed that the nonmethylated (GpppA) RNAs generatedGlucexpression levelssurpassing the signal of the m7G-capped mRNA (Fig. 2B), a result suggesting that in thisexperiment,the classical m7G cap is not required for efficient translation

      That's weird, considering that in their previous experiment both GpppA and m7G-capped viral RNA showed an almost identical titer using the same cell type. Does anyone have a good explanation for this?

    7. The qRT-PCRresultsshowed that the differences in translational efficiencies are not due to RNAinstability of the different reporter RNAs isolated from the transfected cells

      I guess that they used the qRT-PCR to find the relative amounts of each RNA construct expressed in cells. This confirmed that translation itself was inhibited, and their results were not effected by other confounding variables.

    8. DENV

      It looks like DENV RNA with cap unrelated 5' termini produce RNA at a slightly reduced rate compared to those with 5' termini encoding both nonfunctional and functional caps. Though the virus likely contains IRESs in it's 5' UTR, capping still confers a benefit even if it doesn't quite increase viral titer by an order of magnitude. I'm guessing that this is likely because 5' methyl G capping prevents degredation by host endonucleases and aids in ribosomal recognition, while IRESs only aid in ribosomal binding/recognition.

    9. Gaussialuciferase (Gluc)

      Luciferase allows researchers to observe florescence as mRNA is translated. The florescence signal generated is correlated to the amount of translated mRNA, thereby permitting quantification of translation activity. They used this technique to observe the effect of the 5' UTRs in both ZIKV and DENV in order to determine whether these UTRs possessed IRES activity.

    10. RESs)

      IRESs are long stretches of highly structured RNA that allow cap independent translation. An IRES's secondary structures allow it to interact with host factors which recruit ribosomes, thereby fascilitating translation of viral RNA and generation of the viral polyprotein.

    1. we foundthat the y’’11fragment ion, which runs from Pro217 to Phe227and does not contain Thr216, is observed at a mass indicatingno phosphate. In contrast, the y’’12fragment ion, which runsfrom Thr216 to Phe227, is observed at a mass indicating thepresence of a phosphate adduct

      Only fragments containing Thr216 are phosphorylated even if they are identical otherwise, indicating that Thr216 is the CDK2 phosphorylation site.

    2. Level of phosphorylation observed by semiquantitative MALDI mass spectrometry on synthetic peptides derived from HIV-1 RT after incubation with indicatedCDKs and ATP for 3 hr. +, phosphopeptide levels < 1%–25%; ++, phosphopeptide levels of 25%–50%; +++,phosphopeptide levels > 50% of total peptide signalintensity

      This is promissing: they have found that Thr216 is a potential site of activity for CDK2s (both cyclin A and E dependent) using mass spectrometrical analysis. Thr216 phosphorylation is not conserved by other kinases (CDK7/9). It is unique to CDK2, which means that only CDK2 is involved in phosphorylation of the RT complex

    3. a selective susceptibilityto phosphorylation by CDK2

      Thr216 phosphorylation is not conserved by other kinases (CDK7/9). It is unique to CDK2, which means that only CDK2 is involved in phosphorylation of the RT complex.

    4. hr216(corresponding to HIV-1 RT amino acid residues 210–227) wasobserved with both CDK2/cyclin A and CDK2/cyclin E, and tracephosphorylation was observed at two other peptides with CDK2/cyclin A (Figure 2A)

      This is promissing: they have found that Thr216 is a potential site of activity for CDK2s (both cyclin A and E dependent) using mass spectrometrical analysis. Fig 2

    5. .

      They generated synthetic peptides with an amino acid sequence similar to the seven potential HIV-1 RT CDK motifs to determine CDK phosphorylation sites. They incubated them with either CDK2/cyclin A or CDK2/cyclin E and ATP.

      Cyclins drive the events of the cell cycle by partnering with a family of enzymes called the cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks). A lone Cdk is inactive, but the binding of a cyclin activates it, making it a functional enzyme and allowing it to modify target proteins.

    6. CDKs are requisite proline-directed serine/threonine kinases with preference for basicamino acids located C-terminal to the phosphate acceptor(Nigg, 1993). Therefore, the canonical CDK substrate motif isSer/Thr-Pro-X-Arg/Lys, where X can be any amino acid(s)

      Proline-directed kinases are a subclass of protein serine-threonine kinases that phosphorylate proteins on a SERINE or THREONINE residue that is immediately preceding a PROLINE residue.

    7. We hypothesizedthat CDK2 can support HIV-1 reverse transcription throughphosphorylation of HIV-1 RT

      The free energy of ATP hydrolysis (an energetically favorable reaction) fuels the activity of RT (an energetically unfavorable reaction). Essentially it makes the reaction favorable.

    8. This was true for cellsinfected with R5-tropic (Figures 1G–1I) and with VSV-G-pseudo-typed (Figures 1J–1L) HIV-1.

      Exhibits that fusion is not what is inhibited since VSV has a different receptor but still is inhibited by downregulation of CDK2.

    9. CDK2, but not CDK7,resulted in a significant reduction of the proportion of HIV-1-pos-itive cells and of the frequency of per-cell levels of early, interme-diate, and late HIV-1 reverse transcripts.

      Critical result: CDK2 downregulation is primarily responsible for inhibition of HIV.