15 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2025
  2. panda.ecs.kyoto-u.ac.jp panda.ecs.kyoto-u.ac.jp
    1. the rise of the idea ofmixed-race people as an identity group

      I think mixed-race people don't have boundaries to have a definition/to exist such as an identity group, but there's a social truth to it.

    2. And he proposed an account of what this means,practically, in social life. First, he thought, people ''observe orimpute to a person certain characteristics,"

      I love this idea. Rather than sharing our identity with million of people, our identity is active, its definition is by in relation to others.

    3. The identities we think of today,on the other hand, are shared, often, with millions or billions ofothers. They are social.

      Both can be true. The common ground can be shared, but the experience, the identity is personal, individual.

    4. Until the middle of the twentieth century, no one who was askedabout a person's identity would have mentioned race, sex, class,nationality, region, or religion.

      There's also a white perspective on that.

    1. Another possibilitywould be to use a real definition that delimits certain forms of games,for example only videogames or role-playing games

      A broad category (video games) with subcategories (like rpg video games) (which can also overlap with rpg in general).

    2. By contrast, real definitions aim not just to tell us about the waywords are used, but also to find some attributes that are in some wayessential to the object being defined. A chemist trying to find out thestructure and properties of matter is trying to form a real definition ofthe thing studied. However, identifying the essential attributes can bedifficult, and the whole idea of trying to find essential attributes canbe considered problematic.

      But, and maybe it's philosophical or even a metaphysical thought, can things be essentially true without having a social influence? Like even math is based on theories, we say 1+1=2 because it fits, but it's a theory. So real definitions are also based on verbal agreements. (It's more a questioning about the definition of these definitions, I get the difference and how it applies to game study.)

    3. These bounded cases are often as telling about the definition as thedefinition itself.

      “how we perceive things” // when we create somethings, those things are representative of our biases, we like it or not.