Where there is freedom to share and collaborate, there is often also freedom to abuse and exploit,
Open Education only works when everyone is all in, taking it serious and truly wants to learn
Where there is freedom to share and collaborate, there is often also freedom to abuse and exploit,
Open Education only works when everyone is all in, taking it serious and truly wants to learn
Without access to these literacies, contemporary scholars and learners will be ineffective participants in online spaces.
It is far easier to get a hold of a book and open it than try and get permission online to view an article. Open access would make this easier.
To illustrate further, massive open online courses (MOOCs)
Like Khan Acadamy?
Education is a matter of sharing
Since we as individuals and a population are always learning, why would we keep education and ideas and knowledge from others. The more we learn the more we grow.
looks to digital media
in a tech-savy world, everything is changing so fast that to keep up with learning, we need to keep up with what is going on around us
a disconnect between classroom and everyday learning
This reminds me of the AEE conference I attended last year. A similar motto to "not all classrooms have four walls". Classrooms settings teach structure whereas most of the actual learning is done everywhere else.
Students have been learning and teachers have been teaching since the beginning of human existence, probably often without even knowing it.
But teachers have also been learning, and students have also been learning.
Although it is a widely used concept, very few undergraduates can actually define what a “discipline” is.
As IDS students we can!
Students who took these courses were sent pamphlets and textbooks through the United States Postal Service. After completing the chapter, they would mail it back and request the next one.
At first read, I imagined this is way too slow for the 21st century, but in reading it again, homeschooled and GED kids still do their work this way.
The meaning of a sentence will depend on its relationship to other sentences, and the meaning of a short story will be up for debate depending on the evidence that individual readers assemble.
In literature there are the clues the reader assembles, but also can mean exactly what the words say. For instance, if an author chooses to say "The boy picked out his red pen to write his story," some can interpenetrate it as he is angry because that is the meaning of the color, but others will come to the conclusion that a 10 year old boy would rather just choose his favorite color over a simple black writing tool. Some can look at a discipline this way too. One approach to a study doesn't mean it is the only one.
the subsidized meal programs at the school, the start time of the school day
I never would have thought that there could be a direct link between this and crime rate.
Interdisciplinarity is like mixing paint. You can lay colors side-by-side to create beautiful paintings (multidisciplinarity), or you can mix them together to get totally new colors (interdisciplinarity).
Each a piece of art, but just different paths of getting there.
The BIG Terms
I would just like to point out that when these terms were being defined in Intro last year, I was unbelievably confused between the difference. Now, they are second nature.
istance: mixing Mackintosh and Winesap apples would result in less amalgamation than the mixing of oranges and grapefruits
But yet such different flavors coming from those two apples. It is like math: calculus vs. statistics. Two different flavors, still just called "math" by those not in the field, but to those in it, very different concepts.
or they can be finely blended so that the distinctive flavor of each is no longer recognizable, yielding instead the delectable experience of the smoothie.
But in this same fashion, one is able to guess key fruits in the smoothie. Just as one is able to guess main parts of an IDS major, but not stilled be "wowed" by small attributes they wouldn't think of.
Because many academic institutions have promotional policies that allow 4–10 years before faculty are “up or out,”
4 years and 10 years is a huge difference. How are the policies created?
The process of moving a drug from the discovery process to clinical trials requires teamwork.
who decides if the drug is ready to move on? Is it the medical side or the scientist?
To complete general and subspecialty training in most medical specialties requires 5 years or more after medical school. Little or none of this clinical training is directed toward research, so those interested in research must complete an additional 2 years or more either in the graduate student or at the postdoctoral level.
learning is never ending, as everything is constantly changing
Discipline-oriented departments constitute a functional authority structure in charge of teaching, faculty recruitment, advancement, and promotion—as well as degree programs and courses.
this is why we still need disciplines
A possible consequence of not having a team process is that crucial voices will be missing in defining and solving the research problem.
I had a high school teacher always pick out quiet ones in groups to speak for the groups because he always said that the ones that never speak up may have the cure to cancer but no one will even know it.
“different disciplines are continually rediscovering one another's discoveries, because they all have different names for them”
perfect example of a language barrier, and why communication is key.
Almost three-fourths (2,995 of 4,071) of the responding society members reported that they “agreed” or “agreed emphatically.
if such a large number of people agree, why are we not seeing a greater increase in interdisciplinary studies?
Exploring topics across a range of subject boundaries motivates students to pursue new knowledge in different subject areas.
I know personally, I have to jump from project to project because sitting doing a lab report for three hours does not make me want to learn anymore about it.
Constructivism is a theory about how people learn. This theory suggests that people create their own understanding and knowledge of the world through experiences and reflection on those experiences.
Is this the same idea as learning from your mistakes? Or is it just connections to the last time you have heard this idea? Or are those two one in the same?
An outsider's perspective, then, is particularly valuable at times of crisis.
When being an insider, you are used to a norm. An outsider is not, so in the time of crisis they can tell you the basis of the problem, if there truly is one. Maybe it is just abnormal, and not truly a crisis. Just as an outside look on papers and ideas and projects is always good because they will always be unbiased.
The new invention of the vein detector is a device that digitally shows ones veins under ones skin for medical personal to instantly find your vein to draw blood, or insert a catheter of many sources.
all doctors and blood drives should have these. Being poked multiple times is not fun for anyone,
interdisciplinary studies is proven to broaden our intellectual horizons,
vitruvian man is the first thing that comes to mind when we talk about interdisciplinary. Overall, well rounded individuals.
Engaging in this study has had me step back from each discipline of my choice, and relate the assumptions of both, which has ended up teaching me a lot about myself.
We as people are more than one thing. We are nerdy athletes, artistic scientists, musical animal lovers; so why should we spend half of our lives focusing on just one part of us.
Just think about it, if everyone just stuck to guidelines and tradition, the world would never grow and would never have the chance to become any better.
looking at this from a medical standpoint, things like penicillin and nitrous oxide would never have made it past a dirty petri dish or a party drug. Scientists ask too many questions and don't stick to guidelines.
Our society is only starting to get the ball rolling on interdisciplinary communication.
I feel like we have always done this, but just never gave it the name "interdisciplinary"
Other colonial colleges include the College of William and Mary, Yale University, Princeton University, Columbia University, Brown University, Rutgers University, and Dartmouth College.
explains the history of their campus buildings and world-known education systems
A community college
Are community colleges primarily a US thing or do other countries and cultures have them too?
The higher education system in the United States is very different from the systems found in many other countries and cultures.
all higher education? or just public?
This was weird to think of how they are able to still make a social connection when in competition.
In all areas of competition including sports and school and even work, connections are made very easily through competition. All are striving for the same thing.
at first in the sciences and then eventually all the discipline
how dis they determine the criteria of forming a discipline
Religious affiliation occurs in many forms. A religious denomination or order directly controls some institutions, whereas others have only nominal relationships with religious bodies or sponsors.
Where do religious schools get funding. If there is a separation of church and state, how can they afford to be up and running, especially the small ones.
"new nation," remained faithful to many of the tenets of English common law. For example, in New England states, the small farms and principle of primogeniture forbade the division of a father's land among numerous sons, so families had to find useful work for those sons not inheriting land.
very interesting. Was farming the only thing like this or were there others too?