52 Matching Annotations
  1. Dec 2020
    1. For each male person over 14 years of age, a suit of good substantial woollen clothing, consisting of coat, pantaloons, flannel shirt, hat, and a pair of home-made socks. For each female over 12 years of age, a flannel shirt, or the goods necessary to make it, a pair of woollen hose, 12 yards of calico, and 12 yards of cotton domestics.

      This is so interesting to read. It also seems like kind of a random choice. Why are these the things being given to them? And how does that make up for years of torture?

    1. to link Native peoples’ efforts to secure environmental justice and their efforts to rehabilitate sacred land to broader concerns about environmental crises in modern American society

      Native land is some of the most well protected and intact acreage in the whole country. We should learn from them

  2. Nov 2020
    1. we have an underly-ing racist view that has festered in our nation since the Civil War

      Im not so sure if I would consider it underlying. It seems fairly prevalent even today. Especially with our polarized political climate.

    1. That if any such police regulations or rules be adopted which, in the opinion of the President, bear oppressively on any citizen of the nation, he may suspend the same

      Is this checks and balances?

    1. McKennon enrolled applicants whom he believed were half white and half Choctaw, but rejected those who appeared to have African American parentage, regardless of their claims to Choctaw ancestry.

      Interesting bit of racism here...

    1. View

      It is easy to forget the level of poverty many native people are living in. Being in San Diego really disconnects you from the rest of the world sometimes. These pictures are a good reminder of the equity we should be fighting for.

    1. “We could have taken any child. However I was aware that we were doing more for a child when we were adopting an Indian child. Little has been done for the American Indian and it’s about time something more was done.”

      This feels a bit odd though. Basically adopting native children because of guilt. It’s kind of a grey area.

    2. It was passed in 1975, and reflected congressional acceptance of the failure of termination policies and acceptance of tribal autonomy, advancing the proposition that tribes could provide better governmental services to their own members than federal bureaucracies.

      A win for self governance

    3. For example, as a result of the emergency recommendation of the Meriam Report, President Herbert Hoover requested additional funds to supply adequate food and clothing for pupils in boarding schools.

      It seems so far that the Meriam report has been a positive overall for natives. It helped point out the injustices they have experienced.

    4. “These Indians are our responsibility--we took every thing away from them and pushed them out on reservations so arid that it takes 10 acres to graze one sheep, and expect them to eke out an existence…Now I do not know to whom to appeal for help, but it should be forthcoming. We have sent millions to Europe to feed the destitute and now we should send aid to our fellow Americans who are just as hungary

      Super woke for 1947

    5. “Some people assert that the Indians prefer to live as they do; that they are happier in their idleness and irresponsibility.

      Yea I doubt this. Unlikely that an entire group of people are irresponsible and lazy. This is obviously a false narrative spoken about native people to disparage them.

    1. “When statistics came out in 2000and 2002about the rates of violenceagainst Native women, that was very, very helpful for us. It was the first timethe United States government had released any sort of figures [about theabuse of Native women].

      What a powerful set of data. This is very useful when trying to get help. Especially knowing you are not alone.

    2. Finally he said, ‘I am not going to have you go stay with white people. That’show they’d see it, that I can’t take care of my own daughter. If she wants tocome here, she’s your friend, that’s fine.’”

      Wow. This attitude is likely a result of all of the horrible things white americans did to native people in recent time. It is difficult to let past trauma go.

    1. The confusion that ensued was due to the murky legal status that had been burdening tribes since the Marshall Trilogy. A mere decade after being catapulted into becoming U.S. citizens, these same Indians were now being challenged to conceive of something that had never existed before, namely a constitution-based tribal government.

      This must have been so confusing. It reminds me of how some states don't send out explanations for the measures and people on ballots when voting. I didn't know California was one of the few states who did this until recently. Talk about voter suppression.

    2. In complete disregard to the articles of this lawfully binding agreement,

      Was there ever any repercussions for violating these treaties over and over?

    3. Nearly two centuries later, when the United States determined that it needed to build a dam in Seneca territory it did not wait for the Seneca to choose to sell— it forced them.

      This reminds me of the current issue with the keystone oil pipe going through native land.

    1. No Indian shall be forced to cut their hair by any institution or public agency or official, including military authorities or prison regulation, for example.)

      This was very important considering having long hair, even on men, was a part of native culture.

    2. communications media regarding the Indian future within the American Nation,

      This may sound politically incorrect, but where is the line drawn between native people remaining isolated on reservations to preserve culture/rights, and perpetrating segregation by race/origin?

    1. thesaidtribesherebyforeverquitclaimtothegovernmentoftheUnitedStatestoanyandalllandstowhichtheyoreitherofthemmayeverhavehadanyclaim

      this is a pretty aggressive condition of owning land that belonged to natives in the first place

    2. Itisagreedbetweenthepartiesthatthefollowingdis-trictsofcountrybesetapartandforeverheldforthesoleuseandoc-cupancyofsaidtribesofIndians,

      Is this still upheld today? How many native reservations have been disturbed since this treaty?

    1. There were some Native people who advocated for integrating into the American polity, gaining rights through full embracing of American citizenship and dissolving the Bureau of Indian Affairs.

      This is so sad that they had to dip down to this level just to be equal citizens. They shouldn't have to sacrifice their identity like this.

    2. have beseeched their representatives in the Senate and the House to pass legislation granting them equal rights of citizenship with their white neighbors."

      Why should they have to lose representation in order to gain "equality"?

    1. In these lyrics, we can clearly see the mission of boarding schools and assimilation programs—Native people were literally “rubbing” away traces of Native “dirtiness” and revealing civilized “whiteness.” 

      Nice example of white supremacy here. Also, why do they have so many songs/rhymes about being a "good clean" American citizen? Kind of weird lol.

    2. This means that you have chosen the life of the white woman—and the white woman loves her home. The family and the home are the foundation of our civilization. Upon the character and industry of the mother and the home maker largely depends the future of our Nation.

      Gosh this is disgusting. Not only does this objectify women and denote them as domestic slaves, but it is forcing native women to accept this way of life in order to receive citizenship. Not acceptable at all

  3. Oct 2020
    1. "One guy hadn't paid in a year" for land he used. "He'd gotten away with all the oil on a lease for free.

      There seems to be a lot of corruption regarding the documentation of transactions taking place on native territory.

    2. Largely with financing from the bank, her Blackfeet community, though still poor, developed 200 new businesses, mostly with financing from the bank she founded.

      This is a fantastic start to vast economic development and success for natives.

    3. he U.S. made the decisions about investing the money, and if a tribe wanted to use it themselves, it had to get federal permission first

      So essentially, the natives didn't own their own money. It was being managed by the U.S since natives didn't have options for banking. It was a big loophole by the U.S to get out of rightfully paying the natives.

    1. First and foremost, the Marshall Model of Indian Rights recog nizes the exclusive right of the United States to exercise supremacy over Indian tribes on the basis of the Indians’ presumed racial and cultural inferiori-ty.

      This is the same reasoning that was used to justify Jim Crow laws and racial discrimination later on.

    2. The two- step process—discover and consummate by possession—legalized by the dis-covery doctrine was relied upon by all the colonizing

      These immoral doctrines aimed to justify conquering and stealing land from the Native American people. These doctrines dehumanized natives Americans in an attempt to remain morally acceptable.

    1. If any citizen or citizens of the United States, shall presume to settle upon the landsallotted to the Shawanoes by this treaty, he or they shall be put out of the protection of theUnited States

      This seems to directly conflict article three.

    2. Indian Indians residingin their towns, and under their protection, shall be punished according to the laws of theUnited States

      So this means that the US government is able to punish Native Americans through their own law system? Even on their own territory? Seems wrong

    1. wardship

      In my opinion, there was nothing good for natives in wardship. They were treated like children and inferior. It was an excuse to control natives.

    2. Allotment provided a direct path to citizenship. In exchange for moving onto allotted land and adopting the “habits of civilized life,” an individual Native person would be “declared to be a citizen of the United States,

      Immigrants today face the same issue of assimilation into American culture. Immigrants are often discriminated against during a period of assimilation for seeming more “foreign”. This is an extremely harmful practice. Immigrants should absolutely hold on to their roots in order to maintain cultural integrity.

    3. The Court ruled that the state of Georgia did not have criminal jurisdiction to prosecute a state offense that occurred in Cherokee country. 

      This is still true today right?

    4. The two quotes below demonstrate how tightly Georgians were clinging to the notion of historical inevitability that Marshall reiterated in the Johnson opinion.

      Essentially, the Johnson opinion solidified the notion that the Native Americans willingly gave up their land because they were grateful for the culture revision forced upon them.

    5. It presumed that those who were already on that land were inferior to those who had “discovered”

      This perpetrated the idea that Native American people were inferior to the colonizers.

    6. The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA)

      Are there any Native American people in this bureau, or is it a section of government making decisions for people who aren’t represented in the council?

    1. No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office of public trust in this Territory

      This is a very powerful notion, and one that keeps religious ideas out of governing which affects all people whether they are religious or not.

    2. My heart feels good that my red brothers live all around me.

      I wish that natives and colonizers were able to interact peacefully, and could teach each other about their values and way of life.

    3. When my children can read and write, then we will be in a better condition than we are now.

      Education is truly the most powerful asset to a population. It is great to see that this was recognized even back then.

    1. Smallpox had broken out already.

      I recently took a history of public health class and we learned a lot about smallpox and how it effected the native population. It will be cool to connect the two topics.

    2. (in other words, did we ever come close to a Native state? Well…spoiler alert…yes! Kind of.

      I can't even imagine how different American life would be like now if we were governed by Native American people. Learning more about the Native American people will likely give me an answer to this question

    1. a desire to learn for its own sake

      I understand this is true to some extent, but what about learning involving subject matters that aren’t of interest to you? Especially if they are necessary to a fundamental understanding of a career. I don’t like learning about math, and I wouldn’t seek it out, but it is necessary for my major

    2. he whole enterprise really amounts to a straightforward two-step dance.

      I think that any practice which has been going on the same way for such a long time should be reassessed every once in a while to keep with with modern times