VWIL
This paragraph shows that VWIL gives men and women different treatment; the programs are unequal.
15 Matching Annotations
- Dec 2025
-
Local file Local file
-
-
Virginia
If women attend VMI, VMI's statue will change (not many men would want to attend anymore- experience would change).
-
No
This paragraph basically means that the state has no set policy for diversity. Giving education advantages to only men is unfair; that isn't equal protection.
-
- Nov 2025
-
Local file Local file
-
strict scrutiny
Strict scrutiny is when the government can use race when there's a very strong reason.
-
The Chief Justice rewrites the history of one of thisCourt’s most important decisions.
Stevens thinks that Roberts doesn't understand and misinterprets Brown.
-
he plurality opinion is too dismissive of the legitimate interest government has inensuring all people have equal opportunity regardless of their race.
Kennedy is the deciding vote! He thinks that these policies fail under strict scrutiny and they disagree with the Robert's reasoning.
-
The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating onthe basis of race
This is the worst sentence ever. But from this case, it's one of the most famous lines
-
public school that had notoperated legally segregated schools or has been found to be unitary may choose to classifystudents by race and rely upon that classification in making school assignment
This is the central idea of the case!
-
- Oct 2025
-
Local file Local file
-
Fourth Amendment
Fourth Amendment: protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures. This means that the government cannot search through your belongings without a warrant. This entire case states that the Fourth Amendment protects the people of America (through search and seizure, even in Katz's case).
-
-
Local file Local file
-
speech
It's easier for people to see something (like a cartoon) and remember it. That's why creating cartoons was/is a great idea!
-
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
This case was about the Civil Rights Movement, specifically in Alabama. Its goal was to help support MLK and protect the First Amendment (freedom of speech and freedom of the press).
-
- Sep 2025
-
Local file Local file
-
obscenity case
Miller v. California (1973)- determines what is under the first amendment
-
freedom of speech
Freedom of speech- the First Amendment in the US Constitution that protects citizens when they want to publicly state something, the government cannot interfere and monitor what they say.
-
-
Local file Local file
-
New Jersey
Based on this sentence and really the rest of the page/case, the state of New Jersey can't use tax dollars to support schools that teach a certain religion (ex. like Catholic schools). This would go against the fundamental principles of the First Amendment. Also, you can't force a religion onto people; people are allowed to believe what they believe in (that's a fundamental right and freedom).
-
First Amendment
First Amendment: Freedom of religion, speech, assembly, the press, etc.
-