23 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2022
    1. the absence of European slavery suggests that narrowlyeconomic interpretations of history often miss the point.AMERICAN HISTORICAL REVIEW DECEMBER 1993This content downloaded from161.115.147.36 on Thu, 01 Sep 2022 14:15:23 UTCAll use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

      Europeans were able to subject Africans to chattel slavery because of dehumanization; they did not see them as humans. Skin tone, culture, and features are large reasons as to why Europeans could see themselves as "insiders" and Africans (or anyone who was not white/European) as "outsiders."

    2. it was extended to Native Americans before Africans

      could this be because Native Americans were stripped of their culture and forced to convert and participate in the European way of life?

    3. Moreover, the greater the inability of theEuropean to think in terms of slavery for other Europeans, the more he or shewas likely to contemplate coerced labor for non-Europeans

      "us" versus "them" mentality. It seems Europeans made more decisions based on looks while Native Americans made decisions based on loyalty.

  2. Aug 2022
    1. weframewhatis“real”orwhoisapersonintermsoftheirgeographic proximityratherthanother aspectsofcloseness—

      Interesting take - human connection is human connection regardless of location.

    2. There was andisnooffline.

      The idea that the internet is a "fake" world may come from lack of understanding about that world. Because it exists in our world it cannot be fake, it is very real and authentic.

    3. thedigitaldirt,won’tbeasdiscomfitingasitfeelstoday

      This reminds me of "cancel culture," in which people are cancelled for mistakes they make instead of being corrected and given a chance to learn from their mistakes. Maybe in the future we will be better at understanding each other as flawed.

    4. easytargetandexpI-atingexplanationforintractablesocialproblems.

      The internet was created by people and consists of people. Why do we believe that the internet is the problem? It is only an extension of us.

    1. s. The system could surely have functioned justas well if the greater part of this labor had been enslaved Europeans rather thanenslaved Africans

      Up to this point in the reading, there is no clear reason as to why Europeans chose Africans as the source for chattel slavery. It would have been much cheaper and convenient to use European convicts.

    2. clusions.) Unskilled malein Maryland in the years 17slaves in the prime age groupand

      This brings into question, was it about race/color? Was it easier for Europeans to dehumanize people that looked differently from them or lived different lifestyles?

    3. ettled societiesincorporated the institution into their social structures

      I imagine that people, specifically the people who do not benefit from the system, were outraged by the systems put in place by the wealthy. Has the internet given voice to the powerless in search of a more just world?