I am concerned about the feedback that the teacher can give through a platform that intends to promote quantittive feedback. What about qualitative?

Agree. Also, to apply MOOC in high school and elementary school.

It was not about MOOC directly.

I still do not get the difference.

Self-regulation and self-monitoring. The development of metacognitive awareness to become better.

A bunch of options might be problematic as well.

It would be something beyond educational goals.

Intrinsic motivation.

Interesting.

It is relevant to make a study in young learners, especially because in the pandemic situation their technological skills highly increased.

It is important that not only the teacher should know those statements, but the student. Therefore, for the student will be easier to know the expectations.

I agree that learning outcomes do not only depend on the type of strategies, but also the teacher's role.

More than a half of teachers from my school quit during the pandemic year because they were overwhelmed with the continuous changes from one platform to other, interactions, and acceleration of learning.

Challenge

In what way can be MOOC taught as traditionally?

I did not know much about this topic, and I found a very complete page with definitions, roles, advantages and disadvantages

Agree, but also it is an opportunity to develop self-autonomy and self-regulation.

What do you mean?

This is something that it is difficult for the girls when they are in asynchronous because they pretend that I could give a quick feedback once they hand in the activity.

Diverse social spaces, not pnly the classroom, but the park, the halls, the dining room.

It involves a clear path of formative assessment

In a book from Learning Sciences International, Bowen (2020 mentioned the importance of stop believing that students need to fill gaps from a content to be able to understand the next one. She highlighted that accelerated learning design strategies enhance students to learn critical thinking skills without a need of logic topics. A clear example given in the article "of this strategy, where seventh grade students who missed an entire unit on Statistics and Probability are taught the specific concept of “measures of center such as mean” because in seventh grade that concept must be applied to “…draw inferences about a random sample” (p. 9). That type of “just in time” scaffold allows students to move forward with grade-level content while bridging the gap of unfinished learning.

What could be the main differences when applying this model of instructional design in face-to-face classes to virtual environments?

In the following video, you can find more information about the ADDiE model.

During the pandemic situation, many of my students were very frustated with the technology. They are very young to be successful in using many devices.

In my opinion creating an online course is more difficult because it needs to have a clear path, and there should not have much modifications during the process. As it is happening in the regular classroom.

Is this related to how should the teacher blend the topics?

At what extent is an approach, a method or methodology?

I did a poster from an article that I searched. In there, you will find some important points that complement this article.

By listening could be one of the paths to learn. However, accoding to the learning pyramid by Cody Blair (2000) when a student only learns by listening, the percentage that he/she will remember is just 5%.

According to Rimm-Kaufman and Sandilos (2021 the bond between teachers and students need to be strong enough in order to create a better environment of teacing-learnig. Tone voice, empathy and emotional intelligence are some of the factors that they describe as keys for learners to learn.

At what extent microlearning can impact the students' learning when some goes faster than others?

I remember when I was in elementary, a teacher that explained to me the cycle of life through a real life story. I was completely engaged that I still remember her anecdote as it was yesterday.

In my opinion, the students from today have been overstimulating to learn ealier without taking into consideration each maturative stage of the learner. I think that this is happening not only in schools for the parents' pressure, but also because the society where we live nowadays is full of consumism with many advertisements. Hence, people tend to buy more and discard faster.

In nearpod, a platform to create classes, you can have virtual tours, 3D-modelling of the body, simulations of science. It is a great tool for your classes in order to involve the first principle.

The students' needs can be individualized easily. This process allows the teachers to have a more precise progress of each learner. Moreover, it is easier to achieve this differential aspect that every school is trying to obtain right away.

This allowed people to be more immediate in every aspect of their life. Bauman (1999) had described the society as insactisfactory because they want more and more. With the need to be fullfilled as fast as possible.

Collaborative work: logic process within critical thinking.

The role of the human over the algorithms

The use of technology for military objectives is one of the advantages I could observe because the risk of people in the war field is dangerous. What about the easy way to manipulate information once someone can hack one of those systems?

This part might help researches with the data collection, even the analysis in terms of time.

The advantages shown in the article are fascinating because it brings new challenges and skills that education should focus on. However, it is scary because AI is growing triple more than education. That means that we as teachers should prepare children to an uncertain world with unknown jobs.

It is very impressive the capacity of the human beings to develop this time of intelligence. Although, How is it possible to find the limits of a human invention when we are incapable of knowing our own limits? In my opinion, AI is a motive to design better human beings that can over-reach our abilities, but How can we stop it?

According to Mydske (2020) Artificial intelligence has been developed to simulate, and precede human movements and thinkings. He believes it is a great opportunity for sustainability. Whereas, my opinion is to be cautious due to this type of intelligence that somehow it might go beyond what it is made of since the beginning.

I could imagine that this was the beginning of the famous game called Jeopardy. You can create you own in here https://jeopardylabs.com/