body.
She does not have any concern for her body. She does not want to be loved solely just for her body. There is more to her than her body.
38 Matching Annotations
- Nov 2016
-
moodle.loyola.edu moodle.loyola.edu
-
-
I can w
It was very personal. She used an anecdote to share her idea of how it is a waste of time to be so consumed with image and looks.
-
I write this,
This was really interesting how she does not feel pressured to join the bandwagon of women that are obsessed with looks and their bodies. The veil that she always wears impacted her perspective on image and that's a lot of power a thing can have.
-
And now,
In this passage, Haydar is talking about how women are so obsessed with looks and image and getting all the attention. She believes that it is a waste of time.
-
And now, as I write this, I can watch women subjugate themselves on reality dating shows. On a show about aspiring models I ~eard a "':'o~an ~ay that her greatest goal would be to appear in Stuff magazine. I can t imagine centering my life on something as fleeting and meaningless as being ad-mired simply for my body.
Writing this article, I've observed that women like to and want to be liked and loved due to their bodies and looks. I could never imagine myself being so concerned about looks and image like others are. It is a waste of time (405)
-
Veiled Intentions: Don't Judge a Muslim Girl by Her Covering
Haydar, Maysan. “Veiled Intentions: Don’t Judge a Muslim Girl by Her Covering.” True Women and Real Men. Ed. W. Royce Adams, Boston, Wadsworth. 2010.
-
-
mylearning.suny.edu mylearning.suny.edu
-
this conclusion.
This conclusion will show that the egg and sperm are equal. This conclusion will bring Martin's views to make sense. This conclusion will show how stereotypes are easily disguised.
-
hile the "facts" of biology may not always be constructed in cultural terms, I would ar
There is a lot of imagery and figurative language. She refers to the egg as a damsel in distress and the sperm as a warrior.
-
ents. While t
This was really interesting to me because I never really thought about how easily tv, movies, etc can easily 'brainwash' me in a way to think one way without even realizing it. Even in school lessons revolving around sex lessons (egg and sperm). She draws readers in with an andecote referring to a movie.
-
ore commo
Martin is talking about stereotypes regarding femininity and masculinity around the egg and sperm. She does not the fact that eggs are viewed weaker than the sperm and how it has been taught and perceived through movies.
-
The more common picture-egg as damsel in distress, shielded only by her sacred garments; sperm as heroic warrior to the rescue-cannot be proved to be dictated by the biology of these events. While the "facts" of biology may not always be constructed in cultural terms, I would argue that in this case they are. The
annotation below
-
degree of metaphorical content in these descriptions, the extent to which differences between egg and sperm are emphasized, and the parallels between cultural stereotypes of male and female behavior and the character of egg and sperm all point to this conclusion.
The egg is pictured as a weak lady protected by her lady-like clothes, however the sperm comes to the rescue as the strong tough man it is. These are cliche views we have of eggs and sperms in society. (Martin 491-492
-
EMILY MARTIN
Martin, Emily. “The Egg and the Sperm: How Science Has Constructed a Romance Based on Stereotypical Male Female -Roles.” , vol. 16, The University of Chicago Press ,Spring 1991.
-
- Oct 2016
-
fall2017.rswsandbox.net fall2017.rswsandbox.net
-
bogus
Bogus as that was, it was a good website overall. Bogus as the information was, it had good content. Bogus overall, a new website might be better.
-
e library for a book or ma
He uses an anecdote to share the confusion and advice to making sure we are using the internet properly and finding good authentic information.
-
saw my daughter use a
This is something that is really important to be aware of these days. We don't always think about what we are looking at online when we are looking up information.
-
The first time I
He is sharing advice about being cautious on the internet when we are looking up information and sources. Information can be easily created on blogs, websites, etc. The most important thing to know is who is the writer behind it? We need to make sure it is someone who actually has knowledge in the topic.
-
2 Crap Detection 101: How to Find What You Need to Know, and How to Decide If It's True
Rheingold, Howard. Net Smart How to Thrive Online. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2012.
-
The first time I saw my daughter use a search engine to research home-work, I explained that "in the olden days, you gathered information by going to the library for a book or magazine article. You might disagree with a library book, but you could be somewhat confident that someone checked the author's claims about facts before the book was published. When you get results from a Web search engine and click on a link, you can't be sure that what you get is accurate or inaccurate information, miSinformation, or totally bogus."
Rheingold shares a story about his daughter using the internet to study and find resources online to help with her homework. He tells his daughter about how in his time, they referred and depended on books and physical legitimate sources. He goes on to tell her to be careful about what she will find on the internet and how some sources may not be right.(78)
-
-
moodle.loyola.edu moodle.loyola.edu
-
worse
Worse things have happened before the truth came out. Worse events can not cover up what has occurred. Worse things will happen then this scandal.
-
WHOSE FREEDOM?
Lakoff, George. Whose Freedom? The Battle Over America's Most Important Idea. New York, NY. Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 2006.
-
and it is now up for grabs.
Lakoff goes right into talking about the worrisome problem with what freedom is and how it is being perceived. This will draw readers attentions especially Americans, because it is concerning their country and their rights.
-
even worse.
This was really interesting to me because if you read further, he refers to Bush's presidency and how a lot of his actions went against what he says using words such as liberty, freedom and repetition of the word. It makes people not really think about the definition of freedom but knows that everything is okay because he keeps saying it so that means America is doing good because we are free people. However they may not be aware of what other countries struggles may be due to us and our actions as a free country.
-
to lose the idea of freedom is
Lakoff is talking about how the context behind freedom could be possibly diminished. He is concerned about how it could change and that could change America because they are strongly tied together.
-
lose freedom is a terrible thing; to lose the idea of freedom is even worse.
annotation above
-
Freedom defines what America is-and it is now up for grabs. The radical right is in the process of redefining the very idea. To
There is a struggle with freedom and how it represents America. It's on the table and anyone can change how we view and define freedom. The fact that the vision of freedom could change is a scary thought. (5-6)
-
-
Local file Local file
-
The counter to that in spite of that is that with less concentration we become masters of the technique of skimming.
How can you learn better or the same through skimming opposed to actually reading each word of the text?
-
There is a certain way to use the Internet to become smarter.
What is the certain/proper way to use it? Everyone could use the internet properly differently
-
My view is blogging can mislead and misinform just as easy as it can inform. How is it possible to claim blogging is worth doing when these writers aren’t held to the same standards as professionals?
You have explained your argument really good in this paper. You talk a little about credible sources and how blogging is not one, what is an example of a credible source?
-
My best friend lives in the suburbs of Maryland. His nearest library is an hour away and he doesn’t have a license. He’s expected to write essays almost weekly, these essays alwaysmust include a plethora of sources to defend his arguments. Where should he go for these sources? My aunt is old. She needs to become knowledgeable about psychology so she could get a better jobto retire. She has three kids and needs to keep food on the table. Where is the best place where she could access a vast amount of information in the shortest amount of time? My dad didn’t go to college. He owns his own business, a very demanding job that involves a lot of financial accounting. What would be the most effective way for him to advance his career while he puts in twelve-hour shifts at work and needs to supporthis family? My little cousin lives in Atlanta and she loves to dance. She doesn’t live close to a dance school but she wants to learn the dance moves to her favorite music. Where is a place she can go to, so she can watch real peopledanceat any second of the day?
Ethos. Good visual, personal story
-
.
Uses Ethos - anecdote about how internet has been helpful to his family and friends
-
In this paper, I will analyze how Carr and also Thompsons argument is not strong enough to defend therepoint of whether the Internetis in fact making us “stupid.”
This was a really good introduction. You made it very personal and reliable. It's now visually explained through an andecote.
-
-
Local file Local fileWP2.pdf6
-
A more appropriate title for this article would be, Can the Internet Make You Smarter?
You need more background context and examples before jumping into this article title change. Perhaps this would be a good concluding paragraph on why you think the title should be changed.
-
.
When you said the internet can make us smarter only if we use it properly, what do you mean by properly?
-
What is your argument? You explained Shirky's argument really well with tons of points, but what is yours? I can't really see what your opinion is.
-
The problem with this is that most people aren’t going to use a fraction of their free time to write a Wikipedia entry
Try to expand on this topic a bit more if you can. Why are people not interested? Talk about Logos more in this paragraph.
-
I completely agree that with the internet we have the ability to change the world, but he is arguing that the internet makes everyone smarter,and not everyone is going to use the internet for good use. It has the ability to make us smarter, but only if we use it properly
this is a good main point to be able to debate about
-
Throughout the articlehe talks about the internet’s potential tochange theworld, supporting this claim by referring to past events where the internet has been used for good
main point, trying to prove that the internet is a good thing
-