complementary and mutually beneficia
This shows that both approaches have a purpose.
complementary and mutually beneficia
This shows that both approaches have a purpose.
the intellectual world as a club
This makes the intellectual game sound exclusive by making a comparison.
If you are playing basketball and someone starts carryingthe ball around without dribbling or keeping score wrong, whatyou do next is not part of the game but part of real life.
analogy
The only way you can know that X is wrong is if you doin fact try as hard as you can to believe Y.
The idea is applied to an actual disagreement here.
Yetwithin 30 seconds or so we do know it is a dog and not a horse.
It is easy to understand through a relatable example.
Scientists pride themselves on not being gullible, not believingthings easily.
science example
But I make this attack as someone who himself valuesthe doubting game and is committed to it.
credibilty
trying to get inside the head of someone who saw things thisway.
this helps to show what having another viewpoint actually means
Believeall the assertions.
direct command
You must hold off to one side theself, its wishes, preconceptions, experiences, and commitments.
This shows that personal opinions can interfere with doubting.
There are two basic gamesyou can use, the doubting game and the believing game.
comparison
The truer it seems, the harder you have to doubt it. ...
Our own beliefs make it harder to be objective.