49 Matching Annotations
  1. Mar 2023
    1. consistently trailing behind was the Los Angeles Lakers

      "However, the Los Angles Lakers were consistently trailing behind, and secured" might sound better.

    2. Both teams found themselves in the Finals multiple times, seeing victories and losses

      Here it would be interesting if you went more in depth about the Lakers threepeat and how Shaq was on the team at the time, who played for both the Lakers and the Celtics.

    3. The teams had seen another shift in players. Boston had strong athletes like Paul Pierce, Ray Allen, and Kevin Garnett. Los Angeles had Pau Gasol, Lamar Odom, and Kobe Bryant.Celtics started off with a two-game lead, and this momentum led them to a 4-2 victory. The team needed this after a 22-year streak of occasional final places, but zero NBA Championships.The next two years the Lakers saw the Finals. 2009 they won against Orlando Magic, but that was only practice for the upcoming war. In 2010, the Lakers and Celtics once again had a fierce battle in the Finals.

      Kinda gets dry here. When reading it seemed pretty surface level without much depth, just a brief explanation. Maybe explain more with info like the leading scorer from the winning team or a little more description on how the games went.

  2. Apr 2022
    1. delayed by leadership changes at the condo association, financial concerns and the burdens of managing a massive construction project

      Includes possible reasons to why the building was not repaired.

    2. “The fact that two-and-a-half years went by and nothing had been started yet shows that things broke down,”

      Includes a source statement to further insinuate someone is to blame.

    3. The condo’s owners association had known for two-and-a-half years about a flaw in the original construction and major structural damage caused by water and salt infiltrating the concrete and eating away at the steel inside, a common problem in coastal buildings, documents show. But they failed to fix it.

      Directly places blame on the condo's owners association.

    1. Another possibility is improperly installed piles, he said.One last theory under consideration is the possibility that heavy construction next door in 2019 could have damaged the Champlain Towers building. An email released by the city on Sunday revealed that a member of the condo board had gone to the city for help at the time, expressing “concerns regarding the structure of our building.”

      More possible reasons.

    2. A previously reported academic study showed that the entire coastline in the area of the building has been settling, or sinking, at the rate of a couple of millimeters a year. But the deep piles would have provided stability, Mr. Peraza said.

      Another possible reason for collapse

    3. “would suggest a foundation-related matter — potentially corrosion or other damage at a lower level.” But he said it was not certain that corrosion was the culprit, and added that “you certainly can’t rule out a design or construction error that has survived for 40 years.”

      States multiple possible reasons for collapse.

    4. Structural engineers were shocked that a building that had stood for decades would abruptly crumble on an otherwise unremarkable summer night.

      Contradictory. First says that it is a rare occurrence, then states that engineers were shocked that the building stood for so long.

    5. “It would be like a lightning strike happening,”

      Includes uncertainty while also talking about other possible reasons for the collapse to have happened.

    6. “progressive collapse,” the gradual spread of failures could have occurred for a variety of reasons, including design flaws or the less robust construction allowed under the building codes of four decades ago, when the complex was built.

      Insinuates that there could have been multiple reasons that the building collapsed. Not a single reason or single person to blame.

    1. “It’s extraordinarily rare for a building like that to collapse, especially in the U.S.,” Fred Bloetscher, a professor of civil engineering at Florida Atlantic University, told The Post Saturday. “We have extensive building codes used by engineers with built-in factors of safety. This just doesn’t happen here.”

      More evidence to show that this was very unlikely to happen.

    2. “It’s less likely than a lightning strike,” Surfside Mayor Charles Burkett told reporters Friday. “It just doesn’t happen. You don’t see buildings falling down in America.”

      Making this situation seem like a rare occurrence.

    1. Prof Wdowinski said the research was not meant to suggest certainty about the latest incident.

      Provided at the end of article so Prof. Wdowinski does not get blamed if the research came out to be faulty.

    2. The building consultant's report from three years ago came to light in a series of documents made public by the town of Surfside.

      metaphor: came to light

    3. Correspondents say it is not yet clear if the repairs were carried out or if the problems highlighted contributed to the structural failure.

      Again, does not place the blame on anyone in particular. Not sure if this is intentional or if there wasn't enough information at the time this article was posted.

    4. The engineer, Frank Morabito, said the lack of proper drainage was "a systemic issue" that stemmed from a flaw "in the development of the original contract documents".

      Does not place the blame on anyone in particular.

    1. the public's growing desire to be done with mask mandates and other restrictions

      Does not provide proof anywhere. Makes the assumption of what they heard from others.

    2. Most Americans say COVID is no longer a crisis

      The question above the graph only allows the individual being surveyed to respond in one of three ways making their answers restricted.

    3. This Axios/Ipsos Poll was conducted April 8-11 by Ipsos' KnowledgePanel®. This poll is based on a nationally representative probability sample of 1,043 general population adults age 18 or older.

      Poll paid by the Ipsos' Knowledge Panel. Conducted between April 8 and 11 of 2022. 1043 people were interviewed.

  3. Mar 2022
    1. The father of Venus and Serena Williams said Monday he condemns violence a day after Will Smith slapped comedian Chris Rock at the Oscars ceremony — and then won an Academy Award for playing him in the movie “King Richard.”

      Context of who King Richard is and what his opinion on the situation is.

    1. Free speech protections offered by the First Amendment will likely protect many, if not all, of the anonymous posters on WallStreetBets from claims of market manipulation.

      Speculation

    2. GameStop, the video game retail chain, saw its stock rise as much as 1,800% in January 2021 after fans, who believe the stock was unfairly devalued by large investors, championed the stock’s purchase.

      Fact

    1. Biden was both more positive and more measured on the pandemic than in his first address

      Article seems constructed to make readers feel like the situation with COVID-19 is getting better.

    2. The administration plans to provide antiviral drugs on the spot — 1 million pills in March and double that in April

      This article does not share views of the individuals whose tax dollars are being spent.

    3. delivering his address in a chamber full of lawmakers not wearing masks

      Signifier that the individuals working in the government have accepted the lifting of the mask mandate and feel safe to not wear masks around others. May have been included to put readers at ease.