- Mar 2023
-
example.com example.com
-
Students could be asked to engage in a conversation with ChatGPT as part of their preparation for an assignment, perhaps even citing AI outputs within papers when appropriate.
Any tool that we require students to use should meet a variety of standards: as accessibility and privacy come to mind in this case. Can all our students use this tool? If we require students to collaborate with ChatGPT, are we forcing them to give up their intellectual property? At the moment probably not, but that could change at any time.
-
This type of metacognitive engagement with the process of knowledge production cannot be reproduced by an AI chatbot, though it could perhaps be applied to the writing of a tool like ChatGPT.
I'm struck by the bold statement here. Are you confident this cannot be reproduced by generative AI? Has someone tried and shown that it can't be done?
-
If students are annotating throughout a course, across multiple readings, they are writing a lot!
I asked ChatGPT: "Which part of this would you annotate?" And then pasted all of #1 on this list. It responded:
"If students are annotating throughout a course, across multiple readings, they are writing a lot!"
I would annotate this sentence because it highlights the importance of writing throughout a course, rather than just at the end, and suggests that social annotation can be a helpful tool for scaffolding and accounting for summative assessments.
-
- May 2019
-
www.hollowdawnlarp.com www.hollowdawnlarp.com
-
EVENTS
Do we want to include anything about the playtesting?
-