2 Matching Annotations
  1. Mar 2023
    1. Last Updated: February 14, 2023 Published: May 31, 2019

      This source was initially posted in May of 2019 but was updated in Febraury of 2023. May 2019 is pretty recent as it is but the update from this February shows a thorough attention to detail in keeping the information up-to-date and relevant.

    1. ReferencesAmin, N., & Sherkat, D. E. (2014). Religion, gender, and educational attainment among U.S. immigrants. In L. A. Keister & D. E. Sherkat (Eds.), Religion and inequality in America: Research and theory on religion’s role in stratification (pp. 52–74). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Chapter  Google Scholar  Amster, R. (2004). Street people and the contested realms of public space. New York: LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC. Google Scholar  Aptekar, S. (2014). Citizenship status and patterns of inequality in the United States and Canada. Social Science Quarterly, 95(2), 343–359.Article  Google Scholar  Avery, J. M., & Peffley, M. (2005). Voter registration requirements, voter turnout, and welfare eligibility policy: Class bias matters. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 5(1), 47–67.Article  Google Scholar  Barak, G. (1991). Gimme shelter: A social history of homelessness in contemporary America. New York: Praeger Publishers. Google Scholar  Barnes, S. H., & Kaase, M. (1979). Political action: Mass participation in five western democracies. Beverly Hills: Sage. Google Scholar  Barr, S. (2016). Many ex-felons don’t know they can get their right to vote restored. Washington: The Center for Public Integrity. Google Scholar  Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2009). Correctional populations in the United States, Annual, Prisoners in 2009. Washington: Bureau of Justice Statistics. Google Scholar  Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2013). Prisoners in 2013. Washington: Bureau of Justice Statistics. Google Scholar  Casper, G. (1976). Social differences and the franchise. Daedalus, 105(4), 103–114. Google Scholar  Citrin, J., Schickler, E., & Sides, J. (2003). What if everyone voted? simulating the impact of increased turnout in senate elections. American Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 75–80.Article  Google Scholar  Clinard, M. R., Quinney, R., & Wildeman, J. (1994). Criminal behavior systems: A typology (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge. Google Scholar  Converse, P. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206–261). New York: The Free Press. Google Scholar  Dahl, R. (1956). A preface to democratic theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar  Denardo, J. (1980). Turnout and the vote: The joke’s on the democrats. American Political Science Review, 74(2), 406–420.Article  Google Scholar  Ewald, A. C. (2002). The ideological paradox of criminal disenfranchisement law in the United States. Amherst: University of Massachusetts. Google Scholar  Fellner, J., & Mauer, M. (1998). Losing the vote: The impact of felony disenfranchisement laws in the United States. New York: Human Rights Watch. Google Scholar  Fischer, V. Stout. (1987). 741 P.2d 217.Galston, W. A. (2010). Economic growth and institutional innovation: Outlines of a reform agenda. Brookings Policy Brief Series, 172, 10–15. Google Scholar  Gray, A. (2014). Securing felons’ voting rights in America. Berkeley Journal of African-American Law & Policy, 16(1), 3–31. Google Scholar  Grofman, B., & Feld, S. L. (1988). Rousseau’s general will: A condorcetian perspective. American Political Science Review, 82(2), 567–576.Article  Google Scholar  Hanrahan, P. (1994). No home? no vote. Human Rights: Journal of the Section of Individual Rights & Responsibilities, 21, 8–30. Google Scholar  Hayduk, R. (2006). Democracy for all: Restoring immigrant voting rights in the United States. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar  Hayduk, R. (2015). Political rights in the age of migration: Lessons from the United States. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 16(1), 99–118.Article  Google Scholar  Hirschfield, P. (1999). Losing the prize: Assessing the impact of felon disfranchisement laws on black male voting participation. Paper presented at the 36th Annual Meetings of the Law and Society Association, Chicago.Jennings, M. K., van Deth, J., Barnes, S. H., Fuchs, D., Heunks, F. J., & Thomassen, J. (1990). Continuities in political action: A longitudinal study of political orientations in three western democracies. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Book  Google Scholar  John, P. (2009). Can citizen governance redress the representative bias of political participation? Public Administration Review, 69(3), 494–503.Article  Google Scholar  King, R. (2008). Expanding the vote: State felony disenfranchisement reform, 1997–2008. Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project. Google Scholar  Lijphart, A. (1997). Unequal participation: Democracy’s unresolved dilemma, Presidential Address, 1996. American Political Science Review, 91(1), 1–14.Article  Google Scholar  Mill, J. (1873). Considerations on representative government. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Google Scholar  Miller, D. (1999). Principles of social justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar  Montesquieu, C. de (1899). The Spirit of the Laws (T. Nugent, trans.) New York: Colonial Press.Murray, L. (2006). Homeless educated about their voting rights (p. A1). New York: The New York Amsterdam News. Google Scholar  National Alliance to End Homelessness. (2014). The state of homelessness in America 2014. Washington, D.C.: National Alliance to End Homelessness. Google Scholar  National Coalition for the Homeless. (2009). Voting rights for people experiencing homelessness: Legislation, key dates and decisions. Chicago: National Coalition for the Homeless. Google Scholar  National Coalition for the Homeless. (2010). Voter rights/registration packet. Chicago: National Coalition for the Homeless. Google Scholar  National Coalition for the Homeless v. Jensen, 187 A.D.2d 582 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992).Parkin, M., & Zlotnick, F. (2014). The voting rights act and Latino voter registration: Symbolic assistance for English-speaking Latinos. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 36(1), 48–63.Article  Google Scholar  Perez, C. (2014). U.S. has highest percentage of immigrants in 93 years (p. A1). New York: New York Post. Google Scholar  Pettus, K. I. (2013). Felony disenfranchisement in America: Historical origins, institutional racism, and modern consequences. Albany: State University of New York Press. Google Scholar  Pitts V. Black, 608 F.Supp. 696 (S.D.N.Y. 1984).National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty (2008). Voter registration and voting: Ensuring the voting rights of homeless. Retrieved July 12, 2010 from http://www.nhchc.org/mobilizer/Mobilizer082208VoterRegWk.pdf Ramakrishnan, S. K. (2005). Democracy in immigrant America: Changing demographics and political participation. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar  Rinaldi, J. (2008). As economic woes mount, homeless plan to vote. Retrieved on March 21st, 2016 from http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-politics-homeless-idUSN2247207620080723 Roemer, J. E. (1998). Theories of distributive justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar  Schlozman, K. L., Verba, S., & Brady, H. E. (2012). The unheavenly chorus: Unequal political voice and the broken promise of American democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Book  Google Scholar  Schwartzberg, M. (2008). Voting the general will: Rousseau on decision rules. Political Theory, 36(3), 403–423.Article  Google Scholar  Spates, K., & Mathis, C. (2014). Preserving dignity: Rethinking voting rights for U.S. prisoners, lessons from South Africa. The Journal of Pan African Studies, 7(6), 84–105. Google Scholar  The Sentencing Project. (2010). Losing the vote: The impact of felony disenfranchisement laws in the United States. New York: Human Rights Watch. Google Scholar  Uggen, C., & Manza, J. (2002). Democratic contraction? political consequences of felon disenfranchisement in the United States. American Sociological Review, 67, 777–803.Article  Google Scholar  Verba, S., & Nie, N. H. (1972). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar  Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., Brady, H. E., & Nie, N. H. (1993). Citizen activity: Who participates? what do they say? American Political Science Review, 87(2), 303–318.Article  Google Scholar  Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar  Walker, H. L. (2014). Extending the effects of the carceral state: Proximal contact, political participation, and race. Political Research Quarterly, 67(4), 809–822.

      The author includes a lengthy reference list. Many are accessible through links to the article or through Google Scholar. This extensive list of sources indicates a thorough encompassment of information on the topic.