ut of our own
very important
ut of our own
very important
keep education separate so we will never confuse what its purpose really is: freedom
nice, reminds me of education as liberatory (Freire, Giroux, McClaren, Leonardo, etc.)
itnessed a stripping of workers’ rights, and decreasing respect for labor with the fall of unionization rates over the last 30 year
yes, you don't even have to look very far- ie the supreme court's decision last week
That office has resided in various agencies since 1868, including the U.S. Department of the Interior and the former U.S. Department of
hm, I didn't know this history
of “liberal” as a political position and as a form of education steeped in history that encourages the acquisition of broad knowledge, critical thinking and an appreciation of science, culture, ethics and civic
that's exactly what I thought when I read that.
nservative position that education must be in service to the workforce benefits those who are currently in power, and education leaders are aggressively converting that belief into policy.
when its not in service to the prison industrial complex? Or the military?
lack students, whose ancestors’ bodies were once reduced to instruments of labor in slavery, have the most to lose from a shortsighted, politically-driven merger of the U.S. education and labor department
hm
ver, to collapse education and labor into a single agency is to also reduce education’s role in developing full human beings.
another good point
ire to link education and labor — at times with chains. We don’t need a federal agency to concretize the connectio
YES
pushing other awful proposals through
which is what they do over and over and over again.
instructional authority
hm, there are some assumptions in this statement
eans that administrators and staff have that much more of a responsibility to execute their jobs ethical
why?
transitory nature of the population
what does this mean?
success i
again, what does this look like? what is the definition?
ation of and respect for members of the organization has been shown to motivate followers and lift morale, thereby increasing school performance and effectiveness
The trick, or rather the point, would be to make this authentic. How do you maintain this when new people join an organization, and/or when people depart?
ne of the most challenging areas of ethical picture, this practice must be implemented through educational as well as institutional policie
Are there examples of this happening today in schools? With the political climate and mandates, high stakes testing, evaluation systems for teachers, etc., how is sensitivity and understanding being implemented?
These standards must be communicated clearly and enforced without exception in order to be effectiv
What would be the best way to go about deciding on what these ethics/standards are? How is this best accomplished with people from different backgrounds, cultures, etc.? How should they be enforced?/What would this look like?
talent of their followers. This means that administrators identify both staff and students who display the qualities of excellence and
How is talent and excellence defined? Who decides these things? How do we ensure all are recognizes for their strengths- not in a patronizing way, but an authentic way? (Essentially, how to we ensure not the same people, group, etc. are always getting recognized?)
needs of students and teachers.
What would it look like if students had a role in deciding, advocating, and sharing their needs with teachers, staff, and admin?
I have an assignment for an EdD to annotate text across the web. As my interest lies in striving for and furthering issues of equity in education, this opinion article and it's corollary- caught my attention. Then, a friend sent me this opinion piece by the Mayor's son.
My aim is to annotate all three articles, through a more student, scholarly lens- as opposed to just writing my opinions. I hope to do so in conversation with others who would like to engage in this way as well.
Here is more of an overview of the issue, rather than just an op-ed piece. Dr. Pedro Noguera is interviewed as well.
oo many Asians have chosen to preserve the status quo by buying into racism against blacks and the white supremacist system built on
Yes- this is hugely problematic. East Asians especially have privilege that other Asians do not. And within the structure of white supremacy, Asians are and have, historically, been pitted against other racialized groups to keep them down. The idea of the model minority was built on this- see Newsweek's 1968 article and the NYTimes "Success Story: Japanese-American Style"
esearchers have long found evidence that test scores can underestimate the abilities of minority students who are confronted with negative stereotypes about their own ethnic gro
Yes
nkly, Mr. de Blasio’s plan doesn’t fix this problem of inequality.
Both op-ed pieces call this out.
would give working-class parents — including Asian-Americans —
This explanation is more nuanced than the other.
e subtext is that there is a “they” in the school who aren’t deserving of admission
These myths and narratives self-perpetuate and are detrimental
seem innocuous. For example, I remember being the only black kid in many of my classes (something that seemed n
This isn't innocuous and it shouldn't seem like it is either. It shows how students are barred and kept from spaces
shared many of their own stories at a public meeting with the principal.
I wonder what came of this
I have an assignment for an EdD to annotate text across the web. A friend sent me this article after I posted a Facebook message saying I was interested in annotating these NYTimes opinion pieces for this assignment (op ed piece 1 and op ed piece 2), as my interest lies in striving for and furthering issues of equity in education.
My aim is to annotate all three articles, through a more student, scholarly lens- as opposed to just writing my opinions. I hope to do so in conversation with others who would like to engage in this way as well.
Here is more of an overview of the issue, rather than just an op-ed piece. Dr. Pedro Noguera is interviewed as well.
I have an assignment for an EdD to annotate text across the web. As my interest lies in striving for and furthering issues of equity in education, this opinion article and it's corollary- caught my attention. Then, a friend sent me this article.
My aim is to annotate all three articles, through a more student, scholarly lens- as opposed to just writing my opinions. I hope to do so in conversation with others who would like to engage in this way as well.
Here is more of an overview of the issue, rather than just an op-ed piece. Dr. Pedro Noguera is interviewed as well.
I wish that more children across the city had the opportunities they deserve to demonstrate their talent and hard work. It is worth fighting for this principle — in our public schools perhaps most of all.
Again, isn't this what the chancellor and mayor are fighting for?
s the universal principle that talent and hard work should be rewarded
And here is one of the biggest myths and narratives out there- hard work and talent will get you as far as you need to in life- never mind the structural and systemic inequities you and your ancestors have faced, rendering opportunities like taking a single test absolutely inequitable.
t even the school’s biggest critics can seriously allege that the admissions test is racially or ethnically biased, or that it calls for special knowledge better known to some g
have people?
hy some communities have resorted to self-help in the face of the lousy education their children get in the city’s public schools,
I don't understand this- what is meant by "self-help?"
which is so critical for college admissions
Uh- elite colleges have even begun to rethink this- https://www.insidehighered.com/admissions/article/2018/06/15/university-chicago-drops-satact-requirement
ne ethnic group,” it fails to appreciate the socio-economic and other diversity among these students and internal to Asian communities. It’s no surprise that Asian alumni, students and activists have protested that th
true- but what is the investment of this author to the Asian community?
here is so much that is disheartening about that sentence
But isn't that part of the title of this piece?!
36 perce
oh and we don't need any more linguistic diversity either.
44 percent of Stuyvesant students are poor enough to qualify
so another words, we have enough poor people, we don't need to let them in- what about proportionally throughout the school district?
not teaching the basic math and reading skills that are its subjec
Not to re-examine how we assess students? All schools should be preparing students academically.
ly one quarter of the city’s public middle schools, zero seventh graders scored at the advanced level on the annual New York State Mathematics Exam
I wonder historically what the numbers are and have they compare with enrollment.
purposely oblivious to his administration’s utter failure to prepare students across the city for the admissions test
should we just be preparing students for tests?
he gross underrepresentation of black and Latino students at Stuyvesant and schools like
this is a problem and what may be more of a problem is the underlying beliefs that these students don't attend this school, and schools like it, because they "don't have what it takes," "aren't smart enough," "etc." There's another insidious myth about who belongs at these schools and these students are one of them- this is an underlying narrative of this whole piece.
seek legislation
regardless of their abilities.
What does this mean exactly? If they're the "top" students?
Opinion | Minh-Ha T. PhamDe Blasio’s Plan for NYC Schools Isn’t Anti-Asian. It’s Anti-Racist.It gives a diverse group of working-class kids a fairer shot, which shouldn’t be controversial.June 13, 2018
Annotating this piece next!
test
Who makes the test, what is the breakdown between subjects tested? Is the test culturally responsive? How is taking one data point ever "best practice"?
soft
interesting choice of words
available
This is the difference between opportunity and making this equitable. Just because people may have the opportunity, doesn't mean that it is equitable.
sit next to Omar Jadwat in metal shop, Gary Shteyngart in homeroom, Naval Ravikant in history, and Ruvim Breydo in physics, and that made all the difference.
A point to the success these men are? Or another way to say the school was ethnically diverse?
encouraged by camaraderie and competition to push themselves to succee
This seems to be a nostalgic, romanticized version- I wonder what others would say about their experiences.
Protesting Mayor Bill de Blasio's proposal to revamp admissions to New York City’s specialized high schools
This chosen image is interesting- presumably of Asian parents upset with the proposed change. The signs on the posters also telling of the views of their holders (i.e. "I have a dream"- appropriated?)
destroy the best high schools in New York City
What kinds of epistemological stances and beliefs does one have for this position?
No Ethnic Group Owns Stuyvesant. All New Yorkers Do.
I can't help but wonder, isn't this the point of the Mayor's plan?
Digital writing requires time, space, and attention, as well as an inquiry stance
how have educators been successful at these things? What are examples of inquiry stances?
Of the Black Belt
describing Georgia
. Race-prejudices, which keep brown and black men in their "places," we are coming to regard as useful allies with such a theory, no matter how much they may dull the ambition and sicken the hearts of struggling human beings. And above all, we daily hear that an education that encourages aspiration, that sets the loftiest of ideals and seeks as an end culture and character rather than bread-winning, is the privilege of white men and the danger and delusion of black.
nice