13 Matching Annotations
  1. Feb 2021
    1. As for the topic of satire, this novel delivers a perfect depiction of it. From the brainwashed Stepford women to the men who secretly try to entrance them, this novel is satire at its finest. I highly enjoyed the deliverance of the satirical themes and thought of it as highly progressive, well done and realistic to the issue women face in contemporary society.

      Identifying and focusing on the central theme of this particular book is key to this review. Focusing on the theme of satire for this review establishes a crucial point; additionally it analyzes the author's main point and what Levin has intended to convey through his writing.

    2. For a book released in the 70's, Levin created a book with progressives themes and a character who so accurately represents modern feminism at its core. During my time examining and reading this novel, I felt drawn in by the ominous feeling of Stepford and the multiple plot twists that took place. I truly felt scared for Joanna during my reading and could feel the pain she experienced due to her suspicions about her husband while also constantly trying to compete with the men of the town.

      In most reviews, the writer tends to speak of a personal connection to the novel in order to create a better understanding. Sometimes it is key to a good review, as many books are much more enjoyed when there is a close connection to certain topics.

    3. This book will have you at the edge of your seat every second.

      Many people who leave reviews on this digital culture tend to use word 'catchers' like this. It immediately creates a powerful statement and pulls the viewer in.

    1. (I won't spoil anything lol)

      A good practice in this digital culture is refraining from any major spoilers. Yes, you should express your like or dislike for the book, but it is always better to be vague in certain aspects. This way those viewing are also more inclined to go and read the books for themselves to find out more information.

    2. André Aciman has created a novel that exemplifies the fiery passion of romance and summer lust. When reading this book, I was immediately drawn to Elio as a character for a variety of reasons. Mainly, he was just so human and naive to love, which I could relate to. His initial connection to Oliver was confusing for him, creating a high sense of uncertainty within him. However, the love subtly grew into something beautiful and the dynamic between these two completely changed

      Referencing the author and giving him credit is not only common, but also good manners in this digital culture. It is always good practice to credit the writer of a book you enjoyed.

    3. it was amazing

      It is common to leave a rating at the top of the review. It lets readers know what those writing the review thought about the book, and what to expect.

    4. “And on that evening when we grow older still we'll speak about these two young men as though they were two strangers we met on the train and whom we admire and want to help along. And we'll want to call it envy, because to call it regret would break our hearts.”

      In this particular digital culture, it is common to leave quotes from the book in the beginning, end, or different parts of the review. It helps give readers a little insight to the book, and a chance for those writing the review to highlight their favourite parts.

    1. Yeah watching her lose everything is heartbreaking. Ellie is losing her reason to live, and Abby is finding hers. I love how that Pearl Jam song is used as this reference point for Joel too. And I thought it was so devastating how, right at the end, you realise Joel and Ellie made up. I think some people will say that the game has a clear ending and then goes on for a few more hours, but I think that’s entirely the point. Ellie and Dina get to a place that is for anyone else the perfect life, for the reality they live in. The farm house is beautiful, they have peace, and they’re looking after a baby. It’s the end for a normal person – but not for her. That final stretch in Santa Barbara is supposed to, in my interpretation, feel like one step too far. The game is making you feel this weird dissonance between leaving that idyllic place and going back to something horrible.

      Pathetic appeal: This pathetic appeal works because it aims to establish a connection to the characters in the game. The comparison between Ellie and Abby helps understand just how devastating and traumatic life has been for these characters. It also highlights how Ellie cannot let go of her rage after witnessing her father figures death. In general, this appeals to us because readers can feel her rage, sadness, anxiety and how it is all consuming her.

      Overall, I would say the pathetic appeal was the most effective. This game itself is fueled by emotion and the idea of anger consuming someone. So I think this author does a good job at establishing this point. This digital space is one of speaking freely about your opinion, and this exemplifies that. They openly state how they felt about certain parts of the game while also elaborating on their analysis. Overall, they have a great pathetic appeal.

    2. Mechanically, I think the companions were way better to fight alongside as well. They helped kill infected more efficiently and solved puzzles, and it felt like you had a human person there with you rather than just an NPC waiting for the next narrative beat. Speaking of companions, what did you think of Yara and Lev?

      Logical appeal: This appeal effectively highlights the positive mechanics in the game; that being the AI/characters that aid you in fights, looting, etc. This also shows a level of improvement from the previous game, stating how this games overall structure is better than the previous. So, the other authors can now open a logical discussion that leads towards a better analysis of the characters (Yara and Lev). At the same time, this highlights the game as being well 'polished' by its developers and worthy of future discussion.

    3. Joel obviously isn’t a good guy, but there’s a kindness in him and he does care about Ellie. I love that he keeps a book, An Idiot’s Guide to Space, on his bedside. He’s devoted to learning Ellie’s interests so they have some common ground. But he’s done unforgivable stuff. Even outside of the final scene of the first game, there’s that bit where they’re ambushed by raiders on the roadside. Ellie asks how he knew it was an ambush and he replies, “I’ve been on both sides.” He’s a killer and a torturer. His fondness of Ellie doesn’t absolve him of his sins. But still, when he’s lying there on the floor, leg shattered from a shotgun blast, hair sticky with blood, you feel what Ellie feels.

      Ethical appeal: In this part of the discussion, the selected author seeks to add background to the story, particularly who Joel is and what he's done. The author establishes his credibility of his status as a crucial character to the game. At the same time. it is done very effectively because the description also identifies Joel as a dynamic character. Yes he has done bad things in the past, but that does not triumph the fact he loves Ellie. So here, the author has effectively identified Joel as a key character while also maintaining the honesty of his actions and the storyline.

  2. Jan 2021
    1. In that sense, the political Biden is not the man who can change America. It is that other, richer persona, the private self, shadowed by time and loss and a sense of tragedy, that must come into its own. His supporters understood this in November – they voted for him in unprecedented numbers, less because of what he said he would do and more because of who he is: a man of sorrow acquainted with grief.

      Biden's personality and overall reputation are definitely a big factor in why I personally support him. This article is right in the sense that America needs someone who is familiar with a high sense of pain and grief.

    2. The darkness, as Trump’s antics and the violence of his most loyal supporters have demonstrated, is not going to go away at the flick of a switch. Biden’s great strength may be that, because of what life has done to him, he knows his way around in the dark.

      It seems like Trump has blurred the lines of what politics actually is, and what he has made it. I agree with this article; Biden is strong and must depend on that to rally America.

    3. In November 2014, when Biden was serving as Barack Obama’s vice-president, he found, where the house should have been, an empty space marked out by yellow police tape. The building, he wrote in his memoir Promise Me, Dad had “finally run out of safe ground and run out of time; it had been swept out into the Atlantic”.

      I feel that Biden's relationship with his son served as a big impact on the election. We were able to connect to his loss and really see him as just another human being.