Seems like pretty standard "code of conduct in the workplace" stuff, yeah?

This reminds me of the recent example of the CEO of Proctorio (a remote test proctoring software) who posted a student's chat log with Proctorio customer service to a Reddit thread -- the CEO had to later apologize -- more info in this Guardian article

Define "appropriate"... Seems to make room for unfair gate-keeping edtech

OK, so don't make stuff up. But "the facts" in "educational matters" are highly contestable

Without an explicit justice-orientation, I'm afraid this could be weaponized to insist on offering students access to "a marketplace of ideas" that includes unjust ideas

The borrowing of ISTE's principles makes me suspicious from the outset... I've attended ISTE events, and I know that that is not necessarily an ethics-oriented organization... I'm not accusing them of being definitively not ethical, just not what I would consider a leader in promoting ethical edtech.

I find this emphasis on "professional conduct" so fascinating. There's kind of a conflation of ethical behavior <--> professionalism, and given the weaponization of "professionalism" it makes me uncomfortable