36 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2025
    1. which is the area of stereotyping

      There is so much stereotyping in older films and movies and most of those have either been rewritten or taken down if they were big enough.

    2. And you don’t see all that many Blacks in a winning situation

      This is not true now. We see a more equal opportunity and a lot of black athletes that are superstars. There still is some issues that we need to fix but I think everyone should be given the same opportunities and treatment.

    3. Classification is not the only way but one of the principal ways in which we goabout giving meaning to things until we know roughly what class of things it is

      This is important because without classifications we wouldn't understand half of the meanings we do today. It helps put things in groups and organize them.

    4. If cultural studies were simply about trying to understand thedistortions which the media make of a meaning whose truth we couldsomehow find independently of the media

      People form their ideas from what they see and if cultural studies were about telling the truth a lot of misconceptions wouldn't happen. Now with social media people just believe everything they see and most of the time it is just false.

    5. Now, sometimes Hall’s concern with drawing attention to the complexity ofcommunication is seen as downplaying the idea that the media have real andstrong effects on the world

      This is trying to explain how there is a misunderstanding sometimes when trying to explain something. People understand media in different ways and sometimes ideas can go over peoples heads.

    1. Genres are identified by, among other markers, iconographic signs and symbols whichinclude settings, costumes, and props. CSI exhibits an iconography which is marked by theaccoutrement of science.

      The tools and labs used are a tactic used to bring the viewers in and let them know that it belongs in the science/crime genre.

    2. To understand more about the cultural meanings of the police and science as conveyedin CSI, we conducted a content analysis of its first season.

      This was smart so they could make the next seasons much better based on the influence of the first season. They were trying to see if people would be interested in police work or not.

    3. In our analysis of CSI, we adopt the perspective of cultural criminology which seesthe media portrayal of crime and the efforts to solve it as entertaining (Ferrell andWebsdale, 1999), but which works through a symbolism that reflects a series of culturalmeanings, in this case, about crime, policing, and science

      Crime shows were meant to be more than just something fun to watch, they were meant to shape how people view police and crime.

    4. , crime genre plots are comfortably situated within dominant socio-politicalideologies (Cavender, 2004).

      Crime stories tend to reinforce the beliefs that people already have. For example, the fact that the police are trustworthy and will do anything they can to help people. Also the fact that justice is always served.

    5. To a significant degree, the frameworks of understanding that the crime genre circulatesgo unnoticed. There are several reasons for this.

      The reasons for the crime genre going unnoticed is because it was meant to entertain people not educate them or make them think that much about it. Most people focus on the suspense and the action and don't really get what they are trying to portray.

    1. The technique has anearly precedent in the dumbshows which preceded plays orscenes in early Elizabethan theatre

      Silent acts have become almost nonexistent and back a long time ago in Elizabethan theatre they were shown in dumbshows.

    2. All films were originally made anddistributed in this way, though the inclusion of supporting ‘B’films and short features in a package, with appropriate intervalsfor advertising and for the planned selling of refreshments,began to develop the cinema towards the new kind of plannedflow.

      It is true, at first films were shown in the same way every time but as time went by, they thought to make them have breaks for ads and even time to go and use the bathroom or buy more snacks. This made them so much more money.

    3. This general trend, towards an increasing variability and mis-cellaneity of public communications, is evidently part of a wholesocial experience

      Society has changed and the way that the public communicated with each other has became more varied. People tend to interact with each other through technology instead of in person.

  2. blog.richmond.edu blog.richmond.edu
    1. Television’s place amid these interactive flows is bothmore nuanced and less central. The volume and diver-sity of channels and (now) platforms are much greaterthan the handful of choices available in most advancedsocieties when Williams wrote

      Television is becoming less central because more and more channels are coming out and more platforms to watch them.

    2. Moreover, giventhat it is increasingly difficult, though not yet impos-sible, to function in advanced societies without accessto the Internet, the data we generate fuel flows of capi-tal from users back out into the global information flow.

      Modern society has made it harder than ever to live without using the internet. The internet has became such a great resource over time and we need it every single day to operate in this world today.

  3. drive.google.com drive.google.com
    1. As an example of how I would construct the genre, let's trace the development of the situation comedy from the late 1960s to the present. Inorder to do this, we have to take into account developments in the industry and in social and cultural history as well as developments more or lessinternal to the genre.

      The author looks at how the sitcom genre has changed from the 1960s to now and it has changes a bit. The changes show that as time goes on things adapt to what is in demand.

    2. Nevertheless, different methodologies for defining the genre have produced different notions of the sitcom as genre.

      researchers use different ways to study what a sitcoms are and that is why there are different definitions of the sitcom genre.

    3. A more reader-oriented ideological model wouldallow for the production of meanings by the viewer as well.Thus recentapproaches to genre have attempted to combine the insights of the ritualapproach with those of the ideological approach

      Researchers have found that viewers actually help create the meaning of a TV show and it is not just the producer. They take daily life and ideologies and mix ideas with both.

    4. Genres are rhetorical and pragmatic constructions of an analyst, not acts of nature.

      Genres are not naturally existing, they are created by people that are skilled and have studying media for a long time. This is why they are perfected and not just thrown out there. The time that gets spent into these ideas is much more than most people would think.

    5. Television studies is too new a field to have yet greatly differentiatedbetween historical and theoretical genres; however, we are now attempting to redefine, if not reclassify, some of the received categories such assoap opera

      Television needed time to develop and scholars weren't able to fully study TV history since there wasn't much to look at.

    1. One factor behind this appetite was the enormous demographic angesbrought on by suburbanization and the baby boom

      The mention of appetite was referencing to the growing demand for content and they did not think they could handle the growing population.

    2. ere were undoubtedly some lean years for television programmingdespite the medium’s steady growth in the late 1940s. In July 1947 thebusiness press noted that television networks were “no more than a gleam ina broadcaster’s eye,” and complained that “the programs coming out oftelevision’s studios at present are reminiscent of ‘e Great Train Robbery’stage of movie progress.”

      Little did they know that television would become something almost every single person would use on their daily basis. The quality has come so far as well and now it almost looks like real life.

    3. ere were undoubtedly some lean years for television programmingdespite the medium’s steady growth in the late 1940s. In July 1947 thebusiness press noted that television networks were “no more than a gleam ina broadcaster’s eye,” and complained that “the programs coming out oftelevision’s studios at present are reminiscent of ‘e Great Train Robbery’stage of movie progress.”

      Little did they know that television would become something almost every single person would use on their daily basis. The quality has come so far as well and now it almost looks like real life.

    4. However, while thisdemographic shi in TV set buyers and viewers did occur, it happened muearlier than its commonly supposed programming effects.

      This is true, there was a change in who was buying and able to watch TV. It was becoming more available to middle-class and suburban families.

    5. RCA had not only a cumulative investment of10 million dollars in television by the end of the war, but its formidablepatent position in television was strongest in the VHF band.

      I agree that RCA spent a lot of money on TV and it worked. It was a big risk to spend 10 million dollars on a platform before it was popular. Them owning the technology gave them control over what was being put out.

    6. Moreover, the flood ofexported American TV shows that began in the 1950s provided models ofprogramme styles and popular taste for producers around the world.

      It has only expanded even more after the 1950s compared to now. There are shows everywhere you look even on apps where they shouldn't be.

    1. Mu like the advertisements for radio and the phonograph,advertisements for television made ample use of this reassuring pictorialconvention—especially in the years immediately following the war whenadvertisers were in the midst of their reconversion campaigns, annelingthe country ba from the wartime pressures of personal sacrifice anddomestic upheaval to a peacetime economy based on consumerism andfamily values

      TV ads used similar marking tactics used in earlier technology to target the viewers. This was smart because they could make so much money now that people are sitting in front of a screen all day instead of on the radio.

    2. Typically, the magazines presented the television set as the new familyhearth through whi love and affection might be rekindled.2 In 1951, whenAmerican Home first displayed a television set on its cover photograph, itemployed the conventionalized iconography of a model living roomorganized around the fireplace, but this time a television set was built intothe mantelpiece

      This is going with the center of attention theme, it was the families new heart. This means it was the center of attention and the area where families would get together and bond.

    3. As the television set moved into the center of family life, other householdfixtures traditionally associated with domestic bliss had to make room for it.

      Television started to become the center of family life as in, everyone household needed one and it was the center of attention for that home. Television was able to push traditional symbols of family out the way to make room for it.

    4. e central question was, “Where should you put thetelevision set?” is problem was taled throughout the period, formulatedand reformulated, solved and recast.

      "Solved and recast" implies that there is no real indefinite solution which shows how society relies on television daily.

    5. From Jim’s upside-downpoint of view on the sofa, the camera cuts to his shrewish mother whoappears at the top of the stairwell. In a 180-degree spin, the camera flip-flopson the image of the mother, mimiing the way Jim sees her descending thestairs.

      The upside-down point of view shows Jim's emotional instability and this is how we can see it from his troubled perspective.

    1. Of course, there are aspects of a serial aesthetic that might be lost in the shift to a boxed aesthetic.

      This shows the change is how we consumed media. Most people liked the thrill of waiting weekly for a new episode to come out. Once boxed sets came out you could just binge watch the whole season in one go. This took away from the suspense and the excitement for some people. For me when I find a show I like, I enjoy being able to watch it all instead of waiting months to finish a season.

    2. Perhaps even more significantly, the availability of boxed sets enables experiments with serialized pedagogy.

      Boxed sets were made so teachers or people that wanted to study them could do so. This made it easy because it would come with the whole season usually and you could replay as many times as needed.

    3. The most prominent serial narratives in the history of broadcasting, daytime soap operas, have received almost no commercial release on home video and can be seen almost exclusively in their daily scheduled flow without reruns.

      Daytime soap operas are actually at the top of serial shows in broadcast history since most people know them. This is surprising because they aren't streamed and mass produced in DVD format either. So this gives an exclusivity to the people that watch them and makes them plan their day around broadcast times. They are also rarely reran so if you miss them, you miss them.

    1. Broadcast TV characteristically has a slighter stress on the causalnarrative chain of events than entertainment cinema.

      Broadcast TV often doesn't rely as much on cause and effect story line like most movies do. TV tends to build characters and show more their development, while films focus on events that keep the plot together and progressing. TV does his so people want to come back for more every time they release a new episode. Films usually tell the story in one go so they don't need to do this.

    2. Non-fiction films have always had a precarious place in thecommercial cinema, and nowadays they are practically non-existent.

      I agree that most cinemas are fiction but like anything, there will always be a trend that switches around. We do see a lot films that are based on a true story, so to a point that is non-fiction. Technology has just came so far that everything needs to be enhanced for people to keep interest.