coffee

Another great heading (h2)

diuers rare things

infrastructure

with a link to the newly-opened issue

Nihil Novi Sub Sole

"document": { ... }, "target": [ ... ], "tags": [],

HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Type: application/json; charset=UTF-8 { "rows": [ { "consumer": "00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000", "created": "2014-01-12T18:36:15.697572+00:00", "id": "LGVKq4E4SKKro1dBBEMwsA", "permissions": { ... }, "references": ["6lkzoOubSOOymDNDIgazqw"], "target": [], "text": "Peut-etre", "updated": "2014-01-12T18:36:15.697588+00:00", "uri": "http://epubjs-reader.appspot.com//moby-dick/OPS/chapter_003.xhtml", "user": "acct:gluejar@hypothes.is" } ], "total": 1 }

Second, there remains a rift between academic art historians’ understanding of the digital future of our field, and the digitally-inflected work that museums have pursued for decades.39 Thus, the specter of the “two art histories” is newly relevant today.40 Digital methods offer an opportunity for bridge-building between academic art historians using computational methods, and museum staff (including not only curators, but also registrars, archivists, and technologists) who have built rich repositories of collections data. Yet digital efforts in museums have generally been turned towards visitor services and outreach needs, rather than producing or supporting original research. Recent efforts such as the Online Scholarly Catalog Initiative and the digital “labs” at the Cooper-Hewitt Museum and the Metropolitan Museum of Art suggest a sea change in museums’ perspective on this question. However, it will take continued pressure from both sides of our field to ensure that these experiments gain a permanent place at the table.

Jekyll is faster, lighter, and better for longterm security and preservation.