34 Matching Annotations
  1. Nov 2017
    1. termination of afamily's right to an administrative hearing where there are allegations ofdrug use or other drug-related activities,2" implementation of new regula-tions which added drug use as a basis for termination of a Section 8 cer-tificate,22 and seizures of subsidized housing units without any kind ofhearing prior to seizure.

      baically means that a families housing could get revoked and they can get evicted on any basis of affiliation of drugs, and the families have no chance to defend themselves. Landlords can evict as they please and are legally entitled to do so.

  2. Sep 2017
    1. It would be easier for them to hobble to town with a broken leg than with a broken pantaloon. Often if an accident happens to a gentleman’s legs, they can be mended; but if a similar accident happens to the legs of his pantaloons, there is no help for it; for he considers, not what is truly respectable, but what is respected

      materialism

    1. Is it impossible to combine the hardiness of these savages with the intellectualness of the civilized man?

      He seems to be saying civilized man can learn from the simple necessities of these savage people, while being intellectual creatures

    2. When one man has reduced a fact of the imagination to be a fact to his understanding, I foresee that all men at length establish their lives on that basis.

      knowledge is relative

  3. commons.digitalthoreau.org commons.digitalthoreau.org
    1. But man’s capacities have never been measured; nor are we to judge of what he can do by any precedents, so little has been tried.

      Do things nobody has done before, nobody can assign you your purpose in life.

    2. The finest qualities of our nature, like the bloom on fruits, can be preserved only by the most delicate handling. Yet we do not treat ourselves nor one another thus tenderly.

      Hes saying people should take better care of ourselves and each other. Treat each other tenderly instead of brutally

    3. Why should they begin digging their graves as soon as they are born?

      This seems to be a parallel of today's idea of the hard-working class individual that works to endlessly pay bills until they retire/die. Thoreau wants them to live.

    1. The Johnson-Lenzes called their community Awaken, and they included a nondenominational but explicitly spiritual dimension to it.

      This is a virtual community that I probably would've had some interest in. Nowadays these communities take form in Facebook groups for the most part. Im sure none of these people envisioned the behemoth of a community that facebook is today.

    1. It's like taking a federal park and giving it to K mart," Schrader said to Markoff. "It's not right, and it isn't going to stand. As a taxpayer, I think it's disgusting."

      The beginning of the corporate control over the internet, even in its infancy.

    2. Again, it wasn't the mainstream of the existing computer industry that created affordable personal computing, but teenagers in garages.

      Reminds me that communities cant exist under the motive of profit, like from corporations trying to expand personal computers, but can only exist from the motive/ideas of the people that are within the community.

  4. Aug 2017
    1. We kept concluding that simple, corny, all-powerful love was the only way to make a community work when it is diverse, thus guaranteeing friction, and at the same time committed to free expression, which can and does get out of hand.

      as well as empathy

    2. phenomenally successful that for the first several years, Deadheads were by far the single largest source of income for the enterprise.

      As someone who knows the deadheads very well, its very interesting to see their community sustaining skills being used so early on. Makes sense that they assimilated to the online community space so quickly and helped it flourish.

    3. The Deadheads came online and seemed to know instinctively how to use the system to create a community around themselves,

      Very cool how the counterculture of the 1960s, already versed in attempting to make alternative community spaces jumped on to the idea of a virtual community.

    1. Perhaps cyberspace is one of the informal public places where people can rebuild the aspects of community that were lost when the malt shop became a mall

      this chapter is giving me a lot of respect for virtual social spaces that I didnt have before

    2. But these critiques don't tell us how Philcat and Lhary and the Allisons and my own family could have found the community of support and information we found in the WELL when we needed it.

      This whole paragraph describes my apprehension over the idea of human interaction being reduced to being mostly over a screen, but also gave me a perspective I hadn't considered at all before. In the case of Philcat's family, they solely communicated with people online and it helped more than face to face interactions could.

    3. The first Parenting conference picnic was such a success that it became an annual event, taking place around the summer solstice.

      Its wild to me how the idea of a virtual community could turn from a simple question and answer to a place of solace for parents - not only virtually but physically.

  5. Mar 2017
    1. we can best understand the furies of war and politics by remembering that almost the whole of each party believes absolutely in its picture of the opposition, that it takes as fact, not what is, but what it supposes to be the fact.

      People give up their logistics and beliefs in togetherness to justify their anger and antagonism against their "opposing" parties. The fact is, we need to represent each other AS MUCH as we set the conditions for ourselves to achieve what we want. However, people act as if their (at some level - known) misconstrued reality is the fact of the matter, the end al be all, but considering the other side is just as populated and just as convinced in times of political disagreement or war, this clearly cannot be the case.

    1. In any case we can escape from this external way of thinking only as we realize in thought and act that democracy is a personal way of individual life; that it signifies the possession and continual use of certain attitudes, forming personal character and determining desire and purpose in all the relations of life.

      daily democracy

  6. Feb 2017
    1. When minds close, democracy begins to close. Fear creeps in, silence overtakes speech. Rhetoric masquerades as thought. Dogma is dressed up like an idea. And we are told what to do, not asked what we think. Security is guaranteed. The lie begins to carry more power than the truth until the words of our own founding fathers are forgotten and the images of television replace history. An open democracy inspires wisdom and the dignity of choice. A closed society inspires terror and the tyranny of belief. We are no longer citizens. We are media-engineered clones wondering who we are and why we feel alone. Lethargy trumps participation. We fall prey to the cynicism of our own resignation.

      damn

  7. Jan 2017
    1. For my part, I would alarm and caution even the political and business reader, and to the utmost extent, against the prevailing delusion that the establishment of free political institutions, and plentiful intellectual smartness, with general good order, physical plenty, industry, &c., (desirable and precious advantages as they all are,) do, of themselves, determine and yield to our experiment of democracy the fruitage of success.

      The establishment of political institutions, order, industry does not yield success to democracy.

    2. 1st, a large variety of character -- and 2d, full play for human nature to expand itself in numberless and even conflicting directions

      the foundation of culture and society

    3. For know you not, dear, earnest reader, that the people of our land may all read and write, and may all possess the right to vote -- and yet the main things may be entirely lacking?

      Suggests a wholly democratic country with equal opportunity for all people (maybe implying women and african americans?)

    4. Our fundamental want to-day in the United States, with closest, amplest reference to present conditions, and to the future, is of a class, and the clear idea of a class, of native authors, literatures, far different, far higher in grade than any yet known, sacerdotal, modern, fit to cope with our occasions, lands, permeating the whole mass of American mentality, taste, belief, breathing into it a new breath of life, giving it decision, affecting politics far more than the popular superficial suffrage, with results inside and underneath the elections of Presidents or Congresses -- radiating, begetting appropriate teachers, schools, manners, and, as its grandest result, accomplishing, (what neither the schools nor the churches and their clergy have hitherto accomplish'd, and without which this nation will no more stand, permanently, soundly, than a house will stand without a substratum,) a religious and moral character beneath the political and productive and intellectual bases of the States.

      We need quality literature that permeates the masses of American society, giving us political decision and a moral character beneath the political, productive, and intellectual basis. This is the basis for democracy

  8. www.emersoncentral.com www.emersoncentral.com
    1. This interest, of course, with its whole power demands a democracy. Whilst the rights of all as persons are equal, in virtue of their access to reason, their rights in property are very unequal. One man owns his clothes, and another owns a county.

      relating to today, peoples rights to crucial information are fenced off, and under a disfunctional democracy, we can expect unequal rights to this "property"

  9. www.emersoncentral.com www.emersoncentral.com
    1. We are always coming up with the emphatic facts of history in our private experience, and verifying them here. All history becomes subjective; in other words, there is properly no history; only biography. Every mind must know the whole lesson for itself, — must go over the whole ground. What it does not see, what it does not live, it will not know.

      the human condition

    2. The instinct of the mind, the purpose of nature, betrays itself in the use we make of the signal narrations of history.

      We betray the inner workings of nature with our narrative of history or ourselves.

    3. Universal history, the poets, the romancers, do not in their stateliest pictures — in the sacerdotal, the imperial palaces, in the triumphs of will or of genius — anywhere lose our ear, anywhere make us feel that we intrude, that this is for better men; but rather is it true, that in their grandest strokes we feel most at home.

      The beauty of universal nature is available to all: (paraphrased) "education, justice, charity, the foundation of friendship and love, and of the heroism and grandeur which belong to acts of self-reliance"

    4. If the whole of history is in one man, it is all to be explained from individual experience. There is a relation between the hours of our life and the centuries of time. As the air I breathe is drawn from the great repositories of nature, as the light on my book is yielded by a star a hundred millions of miles distant, as the poise of my body depends on the equilibrium of centrifugal and centripetal forces, so the hours should be instructed by the ages, and the ages explained by the hours. Of the universal mind each individual man is one more incarnation. All its properties consist in him. Each new fact in his private experience flashes a light on what great bodies of men have done, and the crises of his life refer to national crises.

      seem to be describing a pre-ordained nature of the universe; the relationship between all that we experience and can experience, and the higher workings of human history and even the stars. They are inseperable, maybe even the same according to Emerson.

    5. But the thought is always prior to the fact; all the facts of history preexist in the mind as laws. Each law in turn is made by circumstances predominant, and the limits of nature give power to but one at a time.

      Human experience does not suffice to real history, even though we fool ourselves into thinking our experience is the law.

    6. There is one mind common to all individual men. Every man is an inlet to the same and to all of the same. He that is once admitted to the right of reason is made a freeman of the whole estate.

      Everyone experiences the world through the common mind, there is no exception. All people of this common mind are made free to the whole. Implies equality, rights.