24 Matching Annotations
  1. Nov 2020
    1. This study shows that both hostile media effect and the friendly media effect are not mutually exclusive, a finding that could mean that the partisan gap is narrowing.

      They say that the partisan gap is narrowing, but I only see it getting wider

    2. Traditionally delivered media tend to have a larger following in times when trust in the government is strong

      I have never thought about how those are connected

    3. Those who perceived the media were biased against Mitt Romney spent more time with sources that are considered conservative

      It seems that everyone wants to be the victim.

    4. plus the Wall Street Journal, the only source trusted by both liberals and conservatives.

      It is surprising that they only agreed that one source was trust worthy

    5. About 54% of conservatives regularly watch Fox News but only half as many liberals (27%) do the same.

      Can be used in paragraph when referring to the rise of Fox News

    6. These studies indicate that some news consumers first go to likeminded sources that support their point of view and then turn to mainstream neutral media to compare accounts

      This could also be used when talking about confirmation bias

    7. While some studies have found that online versions of neutral traditional media are taking time away from their functionally similar non-online versions

      I find it interesting that the different versions of the same media source create different content.

    8. Many news consumers believe that newspapers and broadcast news push a political slant rather than covering all sides of an issue or event.

      This could be used to explain confirmation bias

    9. Gatekeeper bias, coverage bias, and statement bias are media created, while the fourth type is perceptual.

      I never thought about how much bias stems from media.

    1. urthermore exposure tobiased information can result into negative societal conse-quences such as intolerance of dissent, political segregation,and group polarization

      Looking at biased news can make us more bias and we don't even know it.

    2. It is known that republicans and democrats read differentnewspapers and books and geographically sort themselvesby choosing to live in completely different areas

      They look to confirm their biases.

    3. We observeda strong tendency of known political dichotomy where NPRNews and New York Times, which are known to be left-slanted, are positioned to one side and Washington Times,Fox News, and U.S News, which are known to be right-slanted, are positioned on the other side.

      Very similar to the chart we looked at when we first started discussing this topic.

    4. Social media provide an opportunity for researchers to ex-amine how different sources report different angles on thesame event and how the news consumers react to that.

      I would never have thought to collect that information from social media.

    5. propagate interesting news articles to their peers.

      This reminds me of the article where it talked about how some people only get their information from other people.

    6. due to challenges in gathering and analyzing a hugeamount of appropriate data

      Why is it so challenging? Is it just the time it takes, or is there something else?

    7. It may increase intolerance of dissentand foster more ideological segregation of political and so-cial issues

      This reminds me of the article we read about how it could be the reader that's bias.

    8. a number of studies have confirmed that leftand right leaning news media consistently refer to differ-ent think-tanks in their stories

      This reminds me of the articles we read when it said that the news was so divided that they were creating 2 different realities. (This can be used in my literature review)