3 Matching Annotations
  1. Feb 2022
    1. Studies since the 1950s demonstrate the tendency of people to identify with whom they are grouped, no matter how arbitrary or even silly the group boundaries may be, and to judge members of their own group as superior.

      This reminds me of the idea of high school where you have "the jocks", "the nerds", "the popular girls", "the other athletes" and "the nobodies". Where one group always sat themselves higher than individuals within one school. Looking at it from a bigger perspective of the world some religions, races, or sexes also find themselves superior to one another. I feel as if this issue however could have risen when society placed families in "social classes" based off their income.

    2. We conclude with a call for belonging and inclusion as the only sustainable solution to the problem of othering

      Are there other solutions? I feel as if this solution has been brought up throughout history yet no change has been made why is this?

    3. Dimensions of othering include, but are not limited to, religion, sex, race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status (class), disability, sexual orientation, and skin tone.

      This is very important to point out that group identities can include all of these ideas and not just appointed to race, sex, or religion it is outside that realm too.