21 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. @Rosenbaum1983

      i am aware of this issue. it is there for me to study the html elements.

    2. e Figure #

      For matt, this is a bug in quarto meaning these are not renderd properly. i've got a bug request on quarto-cli's github

    3. Improved Calibration: Probability machines often provide better-calibrated predictions by capturing complex data relationships. Flexible Modelling: Unlike parametric methods like logistic regression, probability machines don’t rely on assumptions of additivity or linearity, allowing them to model intricate relationships that parametric models miss. Efficient Feature Selection: These machines automatically select features, making them ideal for high-dimensional datasets where manual selection is impractical. Handling Missing Data: Probability machines handle missing data robustly, minimizing the need for extensive data reprocessing and imputation. Simplified Data Exploration: By exploring complex data structures in a data-driven way, probability machines simplify model specification. For instance, tree-based models remain unaffected by adding squared or interaction terms, streamlining the modeling process.

      the whole list needs a little redo

    4. Supervised mach

      need to define these in the background and ml section

    5. ty scores.

      cite something

    6. dict propensity scores

      add dates here?

    7. 0.11

      more dp and change the spacing of the variable column.

    8. Non-farm Income Access

      find a way to make this column all 1 line to reduce the table size. its a big too big.

      maybe also try and make to a scrollable thing

    9. Figure 3.6: Comparison of Balance f

      perhaps the sizing is wrong. also double check that the labels all line up.

    10. es with a depth between 1 and 5. The best tuning performance was found with shrinkage of 0.2 and 9 trees which were three splits 3 deep. As such, the tuning grid was redefined in a second iteration to use 0.1,0.15,0.2,0.25,0.3,0.35, and 0.4 with only 1000 trees with between 2 and 5 depth. The second fit, suggested a learning rate of 0.35 so the local area of 0.3,0.325,0.350,0.375, and 0.4 is searched in the final fit.

      doubel beck that this all matches as I changes the tuning grid.

    11. Figure 3.1: This

      bolding in the title is wrong?

    12. t”, package = “cobalt

      i need to read through and make sure that my discssion is inlign with hthis

    13. PALCEHOLDER

      here

  2. May 2024