71 Matching Annotations
  1. Apr 2017
    1. And I’d like to be a bad woman, too, And wear the brave stockings of night-black lace And strut down the streets with paint on my face.

      I think that what Gwendolyn Brooks tries to do here is break the segregation that is occuring at that time period. She writes that the narrator wants to "wear the brave stockings of night-black lace implying that it takes bravery to rebel against an issue that was seen as the norm (segregation). Her use of the word "strut" makes the narrator seem ruthless and willing to attempt to make a difference to somthing that dosen't seem right to him/ her.

    2. My mother, she tells me that Johnnie Mae Will grow up to be a bad woman. That George’ll be taken to Jail soon or late

      This particular portion shows the stereotypes that were created with segregation. As we can see, the mother attempts to instill fear withiin her child by explaining all the bad things that will happen to "those" people. However, the child is still curious. What those kids are doing looks like fun to her so she wants to do that too.

    3. I want to go in the back yard now And maybe down the alley, To where the charity children play. I want a good time today. They do some wonderful things

      What I picture when I read this section of the poem is that the charity children play in a bad area of town, and to the narrator as a child, she (or he) dosen't see that aspect. She just sees that they're having fun in the alley. In this time period, there was also a great deal of racial segregation in the United States. This particular scene shows the perspective of a white child growing up in that period of segregation.

    4. Where it’s rough and untended and hungry weed grows. A girl gets sick of a rose.

      I think one of the themes that the author is trying to suggest in this part of the poem is that having great things in life dosen't always mean happiness. As we can see here, this character is used to things like "roses" but yet, she wants to experience what the people in the "back yard" feel.

    1. Whether or not we find what we are seeking Is idle, biologically speaking.

      This is actually pretty weird. I think what this saying is that whether or not the two find love in their relationship (which is what the ultimate goal is; what they're seeking) that's not worth anything in the biological world. In other words, I think the narrator is saying that the true love/ ideal relationship that they are looking for isn't something that is a part of nature. Our success as humans depends on whether we can introduce our genetic material into the environment and reproduce, not to find true love. So I think the narrator is saying that it dosen't make a difference to their success as humans if they find true love or not. All they need to do is reproduce. That's kind of sedistic and a pretty harsh truth.

    2. I would indeed that love were longer-lived, And vows were not so brittle as they are, But so it is, and nature has contrived

      In this part, the narrator claims that this non-lasting love is a part of "nature". "I would indeed that love were longer-lived" means that if only love lasted longer, she "would indeed" truly love someone... she is saying that however, the way nature works makes "vows are brittle" and inhibits that true love.

    3. but now, If you entreat me with your loveliest lie I will protest you with my favorite vow.

      In this part, I think that when the narrator says "If you entreat me with your lovliest lie" she is threatening him that If the love that he has for her isn't real, or if he pretends/lies to love her when he actually dosen't, she'll pretend like the feelings of love actually do exist. At first I thought she was being pessimistic, but I think she is claiming how even though the love may not last forever, she will still try to pretend like it's there.

    4. I shall forget you presently, my dear, So make the most of this, your little day, Your little month, your little half a year, Ere I forget, or die, or move away

      I think in this part of the poem, the message that the narrator is trying to get across is her pessimistic perspective of the love that she has for her "dear". She says, "so make the most of this... [periods of time]" showing the flimsiness of the relationship that she has with her dear. The reason why she says that she will "forget" him is to show how meaningless the relationship is. After a little while, the relationship is going to end, and she will "forget, or die, or move away". The narrator delegitimizes the deep meaning that love has. So the little time that is present should be cherished.

  2. Mar 2017
    1. Night was falling. Birds were singing. Birds were, it occurred to me to say, enacting a frantic celebration of day’s end. They were manifesting as the earth’s bright-colored nerve endings, the sun’s descent urging them into activity, filling them individually with life-nectar, the life-nectar then being passed into the world, out of each beak, in the form of that bird’s distinctive song, which was, in turn, an accident of beak shape, throat shape, breast configuration, brain chemistry: some birds blessed in voice, others cursed; some squawking, others rapturous.

      In this passage, I noticed that Jeff is actually feeling natural emotion after escaping the spiderhead

    2. A few minutes of unpleasantness for Rachel,” Abnesti said, “years of relief for literally tens of thousands of underloving or overloving folks.”

      I feel like this is a very controversial statement. These aren't animals, they're human. But they dont have feelings. The questions that came to my mind after reading this sentence were: Why are experiments be conducted on animals first and not humans? What makes humans human? Is it the ability to feel emotion? In this case, since they can't, are the experiments justified?

    3. Basically, what I was feeling was: Every human is born of man and woman. Every human, at birth, is, or at least has the potential to be, beloved of his/her mother/father. Thus every human is worthy of love. As I watched Heather suffer, a great tenderness suffused my body, a tenderness hard to distinguish from a sort of vast existential nausea; to wit, why are such beautiful beloved vessels made slaves to so much pain? Heather presented as a bundle of pain receptors. Heather’s mind was fluid and could be ruined (by pain, by sadness). Why? Why was she made this way? Why so fragile?

      This is an interesting passage. Since Jeff does not feel any emotion naturally, he now is relearning and describing what it's like to feel empathy

    4. Does it involve whiskey, gangs, infanticide? I can’t say. Can I imply, somewhat peripherally, that her past, violent and sordid, did not exactly include a dog named Lassie and a lot of family talks about the Bible while Grammy sat doing macramé, adjusting her posture because the quaint fireplace was so sizzling? Can I suggest that, if you knew what I know about Heather’s past, making Heather briefly sad, nauseous, and/or horrified might not seem like the worst idea in the world? No, I can’t.”

      I think Abnesti is trying to imply all of these factors about Heather's past to bring Jeff's lack of emotion to its boundries to make sure the experiment is valid

    5. “Jeff, you’re totally doinking with our experimental design integrity,” Abnesti said.

      Usually, in experiments, the person conducting the experiment has a more serious relationship with the subjects. In this case, Abnesti and Jeff seem to have more of a casual friendship

    6. “Rogan,” the dude said. “Jeff,” I said. “What’s up?” he said. “Not much,” I said.

      Aside from Abnesti, there is absolutely no emotion displayed in any of the test subject's dialogues (without the addition of the drugs)

    7. V

      I noticed that every time Jeff encounters a new "test subject" or someone that he will be interacting with, a Roman numeral is placed right before any interaction between the two. However, the first Roman numeral was II (when Jeff interacts with Rachel), not I. Why is that?

  3. Feb 2017
    1. It would be like random.

      Is Jeff saying that it would be random when deciding who to give the Darkenfloxx to because he forgot what kind of experience he had with each woman (what it felt like)? Or did the artificial drugs that were given to him only allow him have an equally enjoyable experience with each woman?

    2. I was here not by choice but because I had done my crime and was in the process of doing my time.

      This passage shows how these "experiments" being conducted by Abnesti are occuring as a punishment for a crime that Jeff comitted. This reminds me of how sometimes, people who commit minor crimes get given a certain amount of hours of "community service"

    3. I had never, before this instant, realized that I so ardently hungered for them. That is to say: a desire would arise and, concurrently, the satisfaction of that desire would also arise

      This is interesting, so when the emotion is put into "the IV", he not only experiences the feeling, but he remembers/realizes how bad he wanted to feel it as well.

    4. Then whatever else was in the drip wore off, and I didn’t feel much about the garden one way or the other

      This Verbaluce therapy gives the character spikes of emotion, and without it, the he can not feel any particular way about anything.

    5. He added some Verbaluce™ to the drip, and soon I was feeling the same things but saying them better.

      Is this like a futuristic IV therapy that can improve someone's language?? Through their veins?

    1. incapable of comprehending a single principle, he executed all the details of his master’s experiments.

      later learn that Aminadab appreciates the birthmark when he says that if that were his wife he'd leave it.

    2. The momentary circumstance was too strong for him; he failed to look beyond the shadowy scope of time, and, living once for all in eternity, to find the perfect future in the present.

      signifying that Aylmer should have been content with the wife that he had. He failed to look into the future and as a result lost something so much more precious and worthy than a birthmark

    3. has clutched its grasp into your being with a strength of which I had no previous conception. I have already administered agents powerful enough to do aught except to change your entire physical system. Only one thing remains to be tried. If that fail us we are ruined.”

      Aylmer is implying that he didnt realize how the birthmark was not just a superficial defect, but something that is much deeper and personal to Georgiana, and that altering it will alter everything about her.

    4. He was pale as death, anxious and absorbed, and hung over the furnace as if it depended upon his utmost watchfulness whether the liquid which it was distilling should be the draught of immortal happiness or misery.

      was he "as pale as death" because his scientific career was consuming him?

    5. Your case demands a remedy that shall go deeper.”

      her birthmark is so bad that that amazing elixir couldn't even heal it? it could wash freckles away, why not her birthmark?

    6. “its virtuous potency is yet greater than its harmful one

      it (the elixir) has it's ups and downs, just like the interference of science in nature

    7. He more than intimated that it was at his option to concoct a liquid that should prolong life for years, perhaps interminably; but that it would produce a discord in Nature which all the world, and chiefly the quaffer of the immortal nostrum, would find cause to curse.

      Is this passage implying that he could have made a liquid that makes people live longer but it would create a disagreement in the world which would lead to a curse, so he didn't make it?

    8. while incapable of comprehending a single principle, he executed all the details of his master’s experiments.

      Is this Aminadab character Aylmer's scientific conscience that drives his emotions regarding the birthmark? He is described as "incapable of comprehending a single principle, but executes all the details of his master's experiments". Does this personality symbolize how Aylmer's views are towards the birthmark? Incapable of seeing the inner beauty of the birthmark, but instead focused on how to remove it? Blindly, emotionlessly, laboring to help spur his scientific career forward?

    9. let the attempt be made at whatever risk. Danger is nothing to me; for life, while this hateful mark makes me the object of your horror and disgust,

      Gerogina's attitude towards the birthmark seems to have changed. Before, she would cry and feel personally attacked that Alymer would make comments about something that she couldn't control. Now, when Alymer mentions that he dosen't know what kind of effects the removal could potentially have on Georgina's life, she asserts that she will take any risk to remove it!

    10. “have you any recollection of a dream last night about this odious hand?”

      wait, how did Alymer's wife know that he had a dream about the birthmark?

    11. feeling that it became the central point of all.

      At this point in the story, Hawthorne has been talking about this birthmark and the distress that Alymer is feeling as the focal point of the story. Is there a deeper reason why he hates this birthmark? Why is this distress being emphasized so intensely?

    12. “Ah, upon another face perhaps it might,” replied her husband; “but never on yours. No, dearest Georgiana, you came so nearly perfect from the hand of Nature that this slightest possible defect, which we hesitate whether to term a defect or a beauty, shocks me, as being the visible mark of earthly imperfection.”

      Since Hawthorne was a writer in the time of Dark Romanticism, (a time when people would try to pierce the reality and look at the dark, sadistic realities) this paragraph seems to demonstrate how instead of looking at the birthmark as a beautiful imperfection, Alymer is "shocked" at how imperfect the mark is.. highlighting the dark reality of the mark

  4. Jan 2017
    1. refuse allegiance to it, and to insist upon the institution of a new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness

      *discouraging passivity and encouraging the vigilance of any injustices