4 Matching Annotations
  1. Jun 2025
  2. social-media-ethics-automation.github.io social-media-ethics-automation.github.io
    1. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Luddite&oldid=1189255462 (visited on 2023-12-10). [u3] Ted Chiang. Will A.I. Become the New McKinsey? The New Yorker, May 2023. URL:

      This article argues that AI is more beneficial for the bourgeoise and the corporate world, rather than the working class. It even makes a comparison to McKinsey in order to further its argument. I think this post makes a really good point as we can see a lot of entry level job being more competitive or downright replaced by AI so corporate can cut cost, making the rich even richer.

    1. How have your views on ethics changed (or been reinforced)?

      Through this class, I've learnt that ethical framework can be applied to anything in life, allowing me to understand societal operation on a deeper level than before and how we mostly act base on the ethics of our mindset. It has also influenced how I looked at social media as well since I've learnt that they've been manipulating ethics in order to boost profit.

  3. social-media-ethics-automation.github.io social-media-ethics-automation.github.io
    1. Merriam-Webster. Definition of CAPITALISM. December 2023. URL: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/capitalism (visited on 2023-12-10).

      the website basically summarizes capitalism, explaining it's opposite economic systems and the working concept of capitalism. After reading this in my opinion, I think there's no perfect economic system and that each of them has their own flaw and in some cases the definition of capitalism might be different for a few different group of people.

    1. Let’s take a moment and look at how Meta’s business decisions relate to what its users want. Remember that Meta is a company owned by shareholders in a capitalist system, so decisions are driven by fiduciary duty, that is, maximizing the profits of the shareholders. And among shareholders, those who have invested the most money get the most say in what Meta does. In this system, users of Meta’s social media platforms have very little say in decisions made by the company. The users of Meta have few actions they can take that influence the company, but what they can do is: Use the site less or delete their account. Individually, this doesn’t do much, but if they do this in coordination with others (e.g., a boycott), then this can affect Meta. For example, when Facebook would make interface changes, users would all complain together, and Facebook worried people would all leave together. In order to prevent this, they began slowly rolling out changes, only giving it to some users at a time, making it harder for users to coordinate leaving together.

      This really opens my eyes up as I can finally understand how the system actually operates Before, I was really unaware of how meta works but I already know that it would want maximum profit through some method, yet I didn't know that users would have that little say in the decision made by the company.