These institutions, intermediate between the primary schools and university, might then be the passage of entrance for Youths into the University, where their classical learning might be critically compleated, by a study of the authors of highest degree.
This quote reminds me of how in high school, students spend a good majority of their time questioning what the point of school as a whole is-- why do we take a variety of classes, rather focusing solely on the ones that pertain to what we (think) we want to for the rest of our lives? How can we get the best grades while putting in the least amount of effort? Why do our tests focus so heavily on analysis of our concepts instead of testing facts? In the face of these questions, students then tend to simply get through high school by memorizing their information and then forgetting it after tests, neglecting classes they find “arbitrary,” and simply trying to get through high school rather than enjoying it. The interesting truth of it all, however, is that the entire point of high school is to learn how to learn. High school is an environment for exploration on a smaller scale-- students have a plethora of classes so that they do not go into any college major completely blind to what the topics entail, and they analyze in order to prepare slowly for the “messiness” that is real world applications of concepts. Most importantly, students are being given so much information on such a variety of topics, and they are supposed to digest the information, rather than memorizing and then simply forgetting it all. When you learn how to learn, you go into your life more intrigued by your surroundings and more motivated to work towards an actual career or other goal. Thomas Jefferson believed that learning happens everywhere and anywhere, and this in combination with my aforementioned thoughts prompts me to think-- how can we restructure public high schools in a way that actually fosters a sense of learning rather than showing students simply how to “survive” and “memorize?”