21 Matching Annotations
  1. May 2021
    1. the total traf-fic energy/emission savings typically double what is saved fromthe technology-equipped vehicles alone (e.g., total 3.39% sav-ings compared to 1.57% savings from equipped vehicles at thepenetration rate of 20%)

      20% is a pretty high adoption rate.

    2. Similarly, it is beneficial to deceleratequickly, and then hold a steady-state cruise speed when reachinga traffic signal just as it is turning green

      I don't believe this. A hard deccel event's effect on the surrounding traffic has to be net-negative

    3. Fur-thermore, the difference of travel time per mile (TTPM) onaverage is relatively small, approximately 0.73% faster for theequipped vehicles as compared to the unequipped vehicles

      I would think the travel time improvement would actually be greater, as ideally, the driver does not need to accelerate from 0

    4. we found that as the cyclelength was extended from 50 s to 60 s, 90 s, and 120 s, generallyFigure 9Fuel savings when cycle length is 90 s with 36 s of green phase.intelligent transportation systemsvol. 17 no. 1 2013Downloaded by [University of Sydney] at 19:33 01 September 2014

      Makes sense. But seems rare to find a main corridor with a 50 s cycle time

    5. Each intersection is equipped with a fixed-time traffic light.Three phases were set up for each signal.

      How does their algorithm work on actuated traffic lights?

    6. Thereare an infinite number of ways to accelerate or decelerate fromone speed to another speed; several trajectory planning algo-rithms have been suggested in the literature, including constantacceleration/deceleration rates, linear-acceleration/decelerationrates, and constant power rates. In our design, we wanted tochoose an acceleration/deceleration profile that minimizes fuelconsumption/emissions and is still comfortable to the passen-gers

      This makes sense to me, but probably isn't the truely optimal method

    7. The control logic for the optimal velocity tries to minimizethe fuel consumption by minimizing the total tractive powerdemand and the idling time while ensuring that the optimalvelocity is less than or equal tovlimit.

      Pretty simple

    8. For case 3,the fuel/emissions are less than the case 1 and case 2, sincevery low fuel was being consumed as the vehicle coasts up tothe intersection (case 2 and case 3 have been extensively com-pared with differences around 15% in a previous study by Li,Boriboonsomsin, Wu, Zhang, & Barth, 2009)

      Good baseline going forward

    9. As aresult, in order to minimize overall fuel consumption and emis-sions while traveling down the road, it is best to maintain asteady-state velocity at these mid-range speeds.

      Useful in [[Research Paper #2]]

    10. For example, atraffic controller’s signal phase and timing (SPaT) informationcan now be communicated directly to individual vehicles so thatvehicles can adjust their speed as they travel through a signalizedcorridor, with the goal of minimizing idle time and acceleration

      Provides the basis for our work going forward

    Annotators

  2. Mar 2021
    1. I think it is clearly the case that the major open problems in many domains involve emergent phenomena and complex/unstable systems that often have lots of complex couplings and nonlinear effects and so on. In biology, cancer, autoimmune conditions, anything involving the microbiome... these are all just intrinsically harder problems than individual infectious diseases.

      Someone on the Village Global's Ventutre Stories podcast, I forget who exactly...) has also stated this point and raised the question: Are western societies, who have become leaders due to their focus on the individual, and the corresponding scientific discoveries (breaking things down into fundemental, stand-alone units) not cut out to thrive in a world where advancements are made from systems thinking