43 Matching Annotations
  1. Dec 2016
  2. www.indianjournals.com www.indianjournals.com
  3. Apr 2016
    1. In almost every case I have been able to observe of illness or misfortune treated by ritual of affliction there has been an additional factor of social disturbance.

      Ok, so like which is causing which?

    2. hough men today are increasingly drawn into the cultivation of crops for cash while hunting declines with the shooting out of game

      Terry Hoops research title: How the Ndembu hunting rituals adapt to modern times

    1. Our host of five minutes leaped instantly to our defen

      In a way it seems the host would had to have done this in order to save themselves/spouse but it's kind of funny to see that in getting into trouble together they weren't imposing but integrating

  4. Mar 2016
    1. Much has been made of the fact that 1 large animal is a more efficient dung, milk, and traction machine than 2 small ones.

      Have attempts been made to introduce other animals into the area?

    1. Here again we find the evolutionists misrepresented. They did not identify evolution with progress

      Why were these people initially misinterpreted? Some of the views expressed seem pretty clear and straightforward so I guess I'm wondering why they are just now (in 1947) being understood in a different way

    1. Science is dispassionate inquiry and therefore cannot take over outright any ideologies "al- ready formulated in everyday life," since these are themselves inevitably traditional and normally tinged with emotional prejudice

      Then how do you get past monogenesis?

    1. But while the superiority of the father and the father's sister is exhibited in the respect that is shown to them, the nephew's superiority to his mother's brother takes the opposite form of permitted disrespect

      Would this structure still be maintained in a family where the mother has only sisters or the father has only brothers? If there's no uncle does someone else fill in for that role or does that relationship just not exist for the individual?

    1. The modern version of a naturalistic study of society, even if lip-service is sometimes paid to the possibility of a scientific study of social change, claims that for an understanding of the functioning of a society there is no need for the student of it to know anything about its history, any more than there is need for a physiologist to know the history of an organism to understand it. Both are natural systems and can be dcscribed in terms of natural law without recourse to history

      This seemed weird to me when I first read it but I guess it makes sense. Looking at the history would tell you how it got to this state not how the current state is operating. It answers why rather than how.

      But I feel like you could also argue that by looking at its history and tracing changes you can see patterns that would allude to function (but I'm thinking of a very systematic way of changing where states clearly lead to another like in a puzzle 8 game)

  5. Feb 2016
    1. But their importance for their descendants lies mainly in the fact that they handed on their magic, and this made the Kula possible for the following generation.

      So like how does the kula start

    2. he building of a canoe, which cannot be described in thisi place in detail, is a big tribal affair. A series of magical rites have to be performed by a specialist or, specialists, who are versed in the art of constructing and carving-the magic being considered indis- pensable to both arts.

      I wonder if the magic and rituals surrounding kula started out this elaborate or built up over time. If they built up over time I feel it would be hard to incorporate something new into the sacred but the rituals starting out this elaborate seems unrealistic

    3. they are fully aware of the difference between the transactions at the Kula and common barter. The Kula involves the elements of trust and of a sort of commercial honour,

      This custom seems like a way to help younger generations learn trust and honor as well as a constant reminder to the older generations. Instilling these values into the community would ensure a level of amicability.

    1. Although enough versions have been r'ecorded to show that in each area the connection between the component parts of the story is firm, the whole complex does not- mi- grate over any considerable distance. On the contrary, the parts of the tale have the tendency to appear in different connections.

      so smaller fragments of the story travel around and are pieced together with local connections?

    1. Further­more, as all societies are born of other societies, with no break in continuity, we may be assured that in the whole course of social evolution there has not been a single time when individuals have really had to consult together to decide whether they would enter into collective life together,

      could it be argued that revolutions or movements are a coming together to consult on which collective life you want to live?? (Like, a political revolution to overthrown the monarchy and or a civil rights movement to end segregation) Or is changing the political/social aspects of a society just modification or adaption rather than choosing a new collective life?

    1. oessentiallyidenticalarethearts,institutionsandmodeoflifeinthesamestatusuponallthecontinents,thatthearchaicformoftheprincipaldomesticinstitutionsoftheGreeksandRomansmustevennowbesoughtinthecorrespondinginstitutionsoftheAmericanaborigines

      wut

    2. theAustralianshadnowovenfabrics,nopottery,andwereignorantofthebowandarrow.

      I feel like categorizing people by the tools they made or materials they used would be hard to be consistent with. Depending on the area you're living in different resources would be available and different types of objects would be needed. Some people might have been able to make more use out of objects that are not seen in other areas. Saying some people aren't as advanced as others simply because they aren't using the same objects doesn't seem fair when if they're adapting to their environment in just as much of a sophisticated way.

    1. and thatfinally the distinction between capitalist and land rentier, likethat between the tiller of the soil and the factory worker,disappears and that the whole of society must fall apart intothe two classes –property ownersand propertylessworkers

      1.1st class - factory owner

      • owns land
      • owns the means of production
      • power struggle between owners and workers
      • 2nd class - workers/proletariat
      • produce goods/provide services
      • no ownership in the means of production
      • no power, owner decides working conditions
      • 3rd class - landowners
      • important in terms of what factory owners need
      • you should become a capitalist
      • 4th class - merchant class
      • transitory; going to become worker or capitalist
    1. A savage hardly conceives thedistinction commonly drawn by more advanced peoples betweenthe natural and the supernatural

      (Assuming the term savage is being used to refer to one holding pagan beliefs?) The same could be said about an adherent of any other religion.

    2. Teutonic kings,again, in the old heathen days seem to have stood in the position,and exercised the powers of high priests.24

      Teutonic order was Catholic but 'heathen days' implies paganism so like??